These days a 'public outcry' really means 'a media cry.' They always do this, say things like 'there has been backlash from the public over..' or 'the public outcry' or 'public opinion' 'public pressure' etc, and they always mean the people in their social and professional circles. There is an actual real public outcry over the elite pedophilia child trafficking ring, but they ignore it because really they don't think anyone else matters.
You may well be right. I'm reserving judgment. These coming days will show what he's really like. It will also show if he had an agenda. If he was involved in child abuse, it could be it was Breitbart's way of dealing with the situation and getting rid of him. They don't want him getting wind of what they're doing, and they couldn't fire him under normal circumstances because of his cult following. This was the perfect storm to send him on his way. Of course, that's only one way of looking at it. I really don't know. It could be he was involved in the older man/younger teen syndrome because of his early abuse. It's illegal, but not the same as cannibal predators who routinely groom, ravage, and molest children. I'm not saying the former is right, I'm just saying it's not the same. We're looking for people that groom and target and victimize. And the proof that even this notion of a beneficial older man/younger teen alliance is blown out of the water by Milo's own distortion of what rape is. The child is not driving the car. Is not. Never ever. It's just his way of dealing with the victimization and the lies told to him. There's a backstory to this that I'm not saying. Someone I met that espouses the same views. She's not a predator, she's a victim and, yet, she holds this peculiar view about children being the provocateurs and controlling the situation. It was just her way of coping for the years of abuse she suffered.
I agree with this and wrote a long post kinda at the end of this thread...did you see it? I'm trying to explore this very issue in a rational way without the usual emotion because I have a real problem with the willy-nilly use of the term pedophile. It's kinda like calling everybody Hitler, and dilutes the evil that those words should rightfully convey.
And the importance is that an adult who engages in sexual relations with a post-pubescent minor should be either jailed, put on probation or maybe counseling depending upon the situation, but I believe they can be reformed.
But an adult who seeks out sexual relationships with pre-pubescent children should either be imprisoned for life or receive the death penalty, because the statistics support that the true pedophiles cannot be reformed.
No, I don't think I saw it. I agree with the lumping of all cases together. There should be some kind of degrees of pedophilia, in a similar manner to murder. I don't think a twenty-year-old who meets a seventeen-year-old and engages in a sexual relationship is the same as a predator who deliberately seeks out children by volunteering for an afterschool program (or similar activity) so they can groom a child and terrorize/coerce them before they molest them to be the same. It's not the same thing. I'd have to do more reading and statistical analysis before I broke it up the way you did. Didn't Sandusky target post-pubescent children? If so, the model you propose falls apart. If anyone should have been imprisoned for life/sterilized/duct taped, it would have been that asshole. And I agree with the analogy you used. Not everyone that does something bad is Hitler. But we really need to rid the world of these large, concerted cabals that prey on children. Anyone involved in a group like this should be given a life sentence without the possibility of parole. I don't care what they actually did. They helped perpetuate a monster.
Like I said I am working on it...this is an emotional and difficult issue and there are so many variables...I agree that Sandusky is an evil monster and he deserved the death penalty, and his preferred target age was 8-12 (pre-pubescent), therefore, pedophile by definition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Sandusky
I am thinking "statutory rapist" would be a good term for someone who has sex with a post-pubescent minor.
Well, I guess my point is that there should also be some division into this being a one-time occurrence and someone that is perniciously, relentlessly, and willfully targeting young sexual partners. Or anyone working within a human trafficking cabal. I would think there should be more severe charges for that.
Agree totally when it comes to statutory rape that there could be extenuating circumstances...like a 20 year old hooks up with 16 year old that lied about her age. That happens all the time and I feel sorry for those guys. Or how about some hot looking teen seduces an older man...that happens all the time too....as I mentioned in my longer post it is totally normal in a biologic sense to think she looks good naked. What makes it wrong is that the adult should know better because that 16 year old is not emotionally or mentally mature enough to consent to that relationship.
And that bring us to the pure evil that is a pedophile....there is nothing sexual about a child...and those who become aroused around a small child are just evil plain and simple. If there is irrefutable evidence of an adult raping a small child or engaging in human trafficking...I say life in prison..those people can't be rehabilitated IMO.
You would be surprised how much this occurs, especially if there has been sexual abuse in the home..remember, sexually acting out inappropriately is one of the ways that prior sexual abuse can manifest....again, not condoning it in any way shape or form, but it does happen. And yes, the adult male bears the blame and it should not be excused....however; I don't think life in prison is the appropriate punishment for this one.
No, other way around, think Courtney Stodden, child in an adults body...but I'll keep working on it and create separate thread when I'm done...important IMO that we define this in a way that we can all rationally discuss and digest, because we are likely to soon see some truly horrific stuff...
You've bought the excuse hook, line, and sinker. You know what? If these "adults" are children, then take away their driver's licenses, credit cards, voting rights, the ability to sign contracts, get married, and anything else to do with being an adult. I don't see any of them doing that, do you? Nope! They run pizza shops, play the fool, and have instagram accounts where they say vulgar things to impress vulgar friends. Let's strip them of everything and then we'll see who really is a child and who just wants to pretend to be one so they can indulge in criminal behavior. Whatever.
I'm apparently not allowed to comment on this thread
... My comment has been deleted 4 times... I have to speak very lightly and subliminally to even get a word in... Here's my hint: Milo likes kids, and he's very open about it.
Provide fucking links with direct quotes. You can't, you cunt. Are you going to ignore humor like the left does and bring up JOKES to support your position? What a terrible person you have to be to victim blame.
Your comments are deleted? Actually, I see at least one ... let me look for more ... No, I see the other ones. Even the one that starts: "Is anyone actually paying attention? Milo has been caught red handed making clear pedophile statements ..." Well, if he is then he deserves to be called on it. From what I've heard of him talking about his youth, it sounds like he was molested and is believing the lies that his sexuality was just too strong. It's pretty sad. As for his other comments, I'm really not a follower of his so I haven't heard everything. But I did hear the remarks about teachers and students and think the ideas expressed as indefensible, but that's me. As for the comments, I don't think your comments were deleted. The Voat comment hierarchy is wonky and random. They get shifted so sometimes they're easier to find using "find". But sometimes "find" doesn't even work because they get hidden.
REPOST: Is anyone paying attention?
Milo is an on the record Pedophile... He is on the record stating he advocates sexual relationships with boys/girls that are 13 years old. What's going on here at Voat is a CLEAR cover up... I'm both amazed and baffled as I've never seen this much censorship in-front of my face as I post. This is being discussed and censored here
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1666140
First of all, anyone who likes that stupid Netflix show (theOA) enough to make that their screen name, seems like a VERY dumb person. Are you rewatching LOST too, you time wasting worm? Enough with the OA.
Here's what's important - and what everyone is missing.
The people who are attacking Milo don't give a shit about pedophilia. They give a shit that he is a controversial figure who says extremely politically incorrect things that resonate with young people and empower them to resist the programming they've been subjected to by both the media and the government.
So, they want him to shut up. This is how they do that.
Remember they want to shut us up, too. If you cheer or dismiss this onslaught against Milo, you are cheering the same forces that will come to destroy every one of us in due turn.
This is spot on. These same people will, despite having evidence shoved in their face, despite having literal admissions from these people that they rape and murder children, defend the Clintons, Podestas, Hollywood etc. because they're all part of the same political alignment. That's all they care about. That's what satanism/luciferianism/Saturnism is - it's complete self-obsessed narcissism to the point of literal delusion. As long as these brainwashed, lobotomized, virtue signalling leftist freaks feel like they're part of the "right" crowd, the crowd that makes them
feel good about themselves and only themselves
, they don't care about
anything
.
Hillary could eat a live baby out the front of Berkley and the students would stand around clapping and then try and kill the guy who comes in and tries to stop it if he was wearing a MAGA hat.
Is anyone actually paying attention? Milo has been caught red handed making clear pedophile statements. A video emerged of him discussing and condoning sexual relations with children as young as 12 years old... He is an avid supporter of young-boy to adult-man sex... This is currently being discussed and actively suppressed here on Voat
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1666140
This goes to show how powerful the globalist propaganda machine is. It facilitates entirely filtering out events, tailoring perspective of events to fit a narrative, or completely manufacturing events.
Think of every major news event from the 2000's or 1990's. All of these were carefully managed. All of them. Most of us were none the wiser.
They manipulate our perceptions and our culture. They aggressively control our perception of what "the majority" believes. If you think outside of their sandbox, you are always alone. This is what Trump is fighting.
I'm sure most Swedes deep down know that immigration is ridiculously out of control. But they won't dare admit it, because they think they're alone. They think everyone else will see them as racist. And they probably will, because that's what "the majority" thinks. It controls reality.
Call me crazy, but this might be a good thing, Milo has to answer to no one now and can freelance, spreading whatever message he wants. Sometimes you got to take advantage of the cards you are dealt.
Or he will fade away into nothingness,you will probably read about his drug induced suicide in the next couple of years,do you know who you are fucking with here.
What do you mean they aren't providing the quote? There is video of him saying this shit posted everywhere. Obviously network news stations can't air clips of what he said but it's all over the place. It isn't like it isn't posted all over the place by now. No matter what he tries to say to get himself out of that when you listen to what he says you can't blame people, especially companies trying to make money, from getting as far away from him as possible.
This will show you all you need to know on why Milo resigned, and why this "new" evidence isn't really new. This was all orchestrated. And frankly Milo is a pedophile.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD064D-yr44
So we're here researching Clinton and Epstein's horrific nature. You're telling me if it turned out there was solid proof of Clinton having sex with a 13 year old that you wouldn't pull the Pedophile card? Come on. Any sane person knows sex with a 13 year old is not okay, and only a pedophile would morally accept or encourage sex from someone that just reached puberty.
This is a complicated issue because there is so much emotion wrapped around it...what gets lost in the discussion is a true pedophile vs. someone who has sex with a post-pubescent minor that is under the legal age of consent. What we are likely to see soon are videos of someone holding down a screaming or drugged child <10 years old and raping them...that is pedophilia, and nowhere close to what Milo was talking about.
When you are talking minors who are post-pubescent but not of the legal age of consent, that is where everyone gets their panties in a knot. The issue is not that you are abhorrent because you see children and become sexually aroused (and yes, those people are truly evil)...because post-pubescent minors are of reproductive age but are not yet mentally or emotionally ready to have sexual relationships, either with adults or peers. I was 5'10', 190 pounds and muscular as a 13 year old...a young teenager's mind in an adult body.
This is why the consent laws aimed at post-pubescent minors are essentially about addressing coercion or abuse of power...in other words, that 16 year old girl with big boobs may look 18, but she's not, and while you would not be abnormal for thinking she looks good naked, you would still be abusing her by being an adult and having sex with someone who is not mentally or emotionally mature enough to consent to that relationship. Another example of this, is most states have laws that teachers cannot have sex with their students, even if they are over the age of 18...and why is that? It is the coercion and abuse of power thing.
The point is that attraction to post-pubescent females or males is normal, but the age of consent laws directed at this age group are designed to protect immature minors in adult bodies from consenting into sexual relationships that they are not yet capable of consenting. Hence the term "statutory rape". And that is the problem I have with loosely calling Milo a pedophile...he is not a pedophile because he is not attracted to pre-pubescent boys. Did you miss the part where he said the age of consent laws were about right? His views on young male/older male relationships are warped because he was statutorily raped. In his mind, he consented and it felt good at the time...but in reality he was taken advantage of by a priest when he was too young to consent in an adult manner. Additionally, when he spoke of the younger male/older male relationships in a positive light, he was referencing his first serious relationship with a 29 year old when he was 17.
Breitbart? You're not going after the fake news people calling them fake news? They're the ones that precipitated this fall. Andrew started pizzagate. He put his finger on Podesta and everyone ignored him until the leak. Bad on us.
I think Milo may have chosen the resignation. As far as I can tell Breitbart has served its usefulness for him anyways. He can go out on his own and start his own thing just like Andrew Breitbart did. He will survive this and get even bigger.
But yes you're correct in pointing out that there haven't even been social consequences to these pedos yet.
There is nothing overnight about this, they have been planning this for before the Rogan "sketch".Unfortunately I am that jaded by now I wouldn't be surprised if Rogan was part of it.I think milo ws half in the bag ,probably did a big growler and shot his mouth.CIA anyone,they have figured how to blackmail bigger fish than this idiot.Set him up and then the big fall, the orchestred riots ,the MSM,exposure,it's almost too easy,hope you enjoyed your 15 second of fame, Bah bye.
I hope I'm completely wrong,but after 15+years of 911 Bullshit and the rest it's hard to think any different,hopefully this is the one (and the most heinous one ) that breaks the camels back.
I always considered Milo to be a plant to lead the GOP off the cliff. His "pedo apologia" interview was bad enough, but it was his BATHING IN BLOOD that led me to believe that he must be "one of THEM."
He probably got pressured to resign because of the pressure of him working at Breitbart and making those types of statements was putting on the Trump administration.
This. Especially with Bannon at the helm and his affiliation to Breitbart. Their focus is on the broader picture, so when associates are compromised, they just have to take their lumps, move on, and avoid the pitfalls. The same goes with Flynn's resignation. He likely did nothing wrong but was in a compromising position that gave the opposition leverage. There are casualties in every war.
I have been pointing out the hypocrisy re: Dunham all day. Been getting blocked left and right. That nasty skank shouldn't be relevant to anyone, but she has a show on HBO FFS
Yes, absolutely. Many of us are victims of child abuse. I was verbally abused at the flip of a coin and beaten fairly often. In one such example, I have permanent hearing loss due to being smacked upside the head, and it took me many years to recover to function socially. We are all unsung heroes. We have to heal together as a planet.
I think the whole thing, Milo's rise and resignation, has been a huge PsyOp. How are we not all super skeptical of an alt-right, nigger-loving, faggot, jew telling the young rights what they want to hear?
Yes, it was a smear campaign. Really, he is not the face of pizzagate or even a spokesperson for it. He's never even talked about it! Hardly divide and conquer. And JA isn't obnoxious and didn't ask for it? Look at his instagram! He's also threatened a pizzagater ... allegedly, of course ...
Another good question. I'm wondering why he didn't at least hit back with, "How dare you say I'm advocating for pedophilia, when I saw (name of Hollywood pedo) and (name of another Hollywood pedo) at Singer's parties with twelve-year-olds? Why aren't you after them?" Now THAT would be a news conference!
Yes, he posted #chickenlover next to a man holding a baby picture. He's also made fun of cooking children, eating children, and of selling babies. That is all in public.
just a thought - if there are arrests coming soon, what Milo has just done is getting everyone thinking about pedophilia and reinforced the idea that it is a serious crime for which there should be repercussions
It could be. But all I know is when pictures from JA's account were posted, the left responded with "WITCH HUNT"!!!! in defense of them. So let me get this straight, a conservative can be held accountability for an unedited video, but an ape can use words like "chickenlover" and start a magazine based on images of abused children can't be held accountability. Further, they should be supported by the community when they are found out with financial assistance. Does this make sense to anyone?
This. Especially with Bannon at the helm and his affiliation to Breitbart. Their focus is on the broader picture, so when associates are compromised, they just have to take their lumps, move on, and avoid the pitfalls. The same goes with Flynn's resignation. He likely did nothing wrong but was in a compromising position that gave the opposition leverage. There are casualties in every war
It's my opinion that Milo was hit with this bogus line of attack because he was one of the first high-profile people to talk about Pizzagate. I think that because he was willing to talk about it, the decision was to paint him as a pedophile in order to distract away from those he may reveal as being complicit in child sex trafficking.
This is bolstered somewhat by the revelation that the group that targeted Milo was backed by Evan McMullin, the CIA scumfuck who ran for president on the basis that "Trump sucks, the GOP should always back the establishment". Obviously protecting their own.
Why did he resign? I'll counter that with a question: how does he defend himself from this charge? A full media blitz is on to misrepresent him as a defender of pedophilia. What the narrative is taking advantage of, and which Milo has brought up in past(including in the very videos in question) is that fact that in the United States, we have a very puritanical view towards sexuality that makes even discussing sexual concepts in public difficult. While Trump, for example, can clarify or even shift his views on issues like immigration or tax policy to better communicate with the masses, nobody can clarify sexuality-related opinions without being painted as some sort of deviant. Pedophilia IS a reality of sexuality in every country on earth, just as homosexuality and other unconventional sexual practices are; however, too many people in this country cringe or blanche at such discussion, even if it is nothing more than clinical analysis. The Kinsey Report was a notorious example of this. Anyone who discusses sexuality in this country and later on has opinions that challenge the politics of the mainstream media will be presented as some sort of sick raping freak by said media. It's yet another cheap tactic to silence them and prevent them from having any credibility, thus undermining every other message, no matter how noble or important that message may be.
I've experienced this same thing for months within this very movement. We'll have somebody come by with a kid's cartoon from the 80s or 90s, and they'll note some adult humor that was surreptitiously placed in the show, and immediately start claiming that everyone behind the show must have been a kid toucher and needs to be investigated. In fact, these kinds of examples were common back when people making shows knew that adults would be watching shows with their children, and were in fact working to make the show appealing to multiple generations. Myself and many others I know often go back to watch these shows and end up being entertained by the jokes that we completely failed to get as kids(which was by design), but now we understand as adults. The weaving of such humor took a lot of talent, but hypersensitive people will take that juxtaposition and draw something far more sinister out of it. While I understand such fears in light of Pizzagate revelations, I also acknowledge that, unfortunately, such a movement will also breed a certain degree of paranoia.
That kind of paranoia is what is mobilized here against Milo, and anyone here who is dumb enough to think this will be a one-time thing is in for a ride, because since it worked, the media and the pro-government forces will be employing it over and over, until, like the Nazi label, it's dead from overuse.
You raise some good points. But using the excuse something is pervasive is not a way to validate that it's necessarily moral or right. For example, incest, bestiality, rape, murder, torture, and serial killings are also part of every culture and go on all over the world. These are not wholesome or ethical and should be put on an list to try to eradicate. So pointing to 'pedophilia' as being a worldwide concept just doesn't really say anything other than it's a fact. If a child is under twelve, there can't be any possible argument made that molesting this child is in any way shape or form "good". This is especially true of toddlers. The trauma suffered is immeasurable and I've met people and have anecdotal evidence to support this. I also have spoken to psychologists involved in trying to make these victims whole. It's a harrowing process. When you get to the age of 16, it gets dicey as to what is predatory, and what is "good". Teenagers have raging hormones. They get themselves into trouble by thinking they can handle anything when, in fact, they are kids. They don't have the maturity to handle a lot of things they think they can. But does this mean they can't engage in sex? It's why the laws are in place. If they are dealing with children their own age, it becomes a more level playing field. It would be like you or I encountering a ninja in an alley. How do you think we'd come out of that experience? A winner? That said, there are now gangs where peers of these children groom, befriend, and betray them by involving them in sex trafficking. So age is one component in this coming of age and awakening to sex. But so is a level playing field. If someone is targeting another individual and has an agenda that is not healthy, productive, or even totally against what they're espousing all to lure, entrap, and deceive, then, Houston, we have a problem. This is especially true when you have a ring of predators who do this repeatedly and have no heart, compassion, or regret over the breaking of little spirits and lives. Add in doing it for money, and you really put the icing on the proverbial cake. No, pedophilia is not right. It will never be right no matter how many people tell you it is. Per Milo's example, is a 28-year-old involving himself with a 16-year-old the same as an elite pedophile ring like the one that stole Madeleine McCann? We can't say that with certainty. Sandusky was one individual and look how many lives he ruined.. So while you're expressing yourself cogently and eloquently, the kite you're floating won't fly.
He never did the talk about pizzagate. Unless you count his Joe Rogan interview where he said he went to some Hollywood sex parties with "very very young boys." Milo is a suspect in pizzagate, and should not be the face of pizzagate.
It was staff at Breitbart that had prevented him from doing a talk on pizzagate previously. I'm predicting that we will hear about pizza gate from Milo sooner than later now.
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=zBLCRy-Pfn0
this is the proof, his own words on the subject of why he can't do the talk. There. That means it was Breitbart. Not in a "cover up" way, if that's what you thought the insinuation was. I view it as though either Breitbart knew to some degree, and Bannon probably has a plan of how and when, and Milo probably just wants to run with it, regardless of how it plays.
I hope you're right. He might have been going to talk about it at Berkeley. We'll never know. But if was going to say something explosive, he sure didn't use the press conference and this platform shoved underneath him to his advantage. I mean, he probably had all the major news outlets trained on him ... but there may be a plan. There my be something that's coming up that everybody is taking pains not to screw up by saying anything.
Just YouTube milo pizza gate.
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=zBLCRy-Pfn0
I think he'll talk soon. The public pressure to name names in regards to the Hollywood parties will be the reason I think. This will ultimately backfire, as has every other attempt to silence this info. When Milo kissed Gavin McInnes at the end of their "fuck islam" press conference after the Orlando gay nightclub Islamic terrorist shooting, when Gavin was ensuring their armed guards were watchin the rooftops (he has children), Milo said he "didn't care", and he'd "happily die for this". That should give you some sense of how he approaches this. I think he truly will burn it down in a blaze of flaming gay glory. That man has changed the paradigm of our time, and won't likely be recognized as such for a generation. The future highschool radicals will wear Milo swag rather than Che hats. Those Che berets are tre gay anyway. Long live the queen.
I hope you're right, but we'll all see together. If he does emerge like Gandalf the White and actually break the silence, it will be monumental.
I think this might be cathartic for him as well. From what he said, he was abused and very much taken advantage, but we'll see. Here's to anyone that wants to come forward and put an end to this pedophile ring. I don't know why people would choose to live under tyrannical rule, and that's what this is. When someone attempts to silence you with blackmail that "you'll never work in Hollywood and/or Washington again," that's blackmail. And Hollywood has gotten so horrible under the pedos rule. They re talentless, non-creative little cretins that put together film and music to fulfill their twisted desires. Can you imagine all the brilliant people that are turned away because they won't go along with and play this sick game? Somebody has to be the one to speak out. The world is waiting.
He was invited to a high profile conservative conference. It was then discovered he's advocated for pedophilia. Of course it's a huge deal. Of course it's in the news. Of course he was uninvited, lost his job, and lost a book deal over it. That's what happens when you get outed as an advocate of pedophilia.
But he wasn't an advocate. I think people have lost the ability to interpret words. Common core means no common sense. Like "Illegal" immigrant. The left doesn't hear "Illegal". It's pitched like a dog whistle so they never ever hear it. And like this. He said fifty times he didn't advocate it. But that's drifting from the point that (a) the left are genetically incapable of hearing certain words or interpreting them properly; and (b) if the left are all that riled up over people advocating for pedophilia, why are they not after the Podestas, Biden, Luzzatto and JA? Why do they not want their heads on a platter? Which is it? Biden fondled a child's breast in public ... on film ... and there's was no outcry. Instead, the left drew up funny memes of Obama and Biden taking jabs at Trump. I saw enough of them to make me vomit. So you say, "of course". So why not "of course" for the cannibal elite?
MSM is using the common irrational fear that gay men are pedophiles to try and sink Milo because he refuses to bend to their will. They know that a good portion of people believe that gay men are secretly pedophiles, so they are using that (and a possibly edited video) to drown the person that threatens them the most.
Milo is always willing to blow the lid off of major scandals and he's very supportive of PGers.
True. But if there's something coming ... and he knows ... he doesn't have to do anything, but resign and let the media firestorm die down. There's so many ways to process this, but only one right way ... we'll all see together.
It's up to him if he resigns, seems he's not such a 'don't give a fuck rebel' after all. Why are we even looking to this attention-grabbing queen, giving him more attention? smh.
Now, to make the leap to "protecting Hollywood" pedos from providing personal examples of rampant pedophilia without naming names, is an aggregious attack. Say he were to in fact, name names, as you would have him do, what does that do exactly? Sure, it provides a valid target for fringe "investigators" maybe; but, almost certainly, it would provide Milo with career ending legal fess, and he would be relegated to the same fringes as pizzagators. Just grow up, and play it through. He most likely would have not said ANYTHING on the topic if he was "protecting Hollywood pedos". Your selective clip (out of context) is EXACTLY what this whole media shitstorm has done. You're likely a shill, or THE EXACT REASON THIS SHIT GETS ANY TRACTION.
Milo admitted to going and engaging in these Hollywood parties. I agree why would anyone defend amilo after that. He has held these stances for many years.
You are taking those comments out-of-context. Also, I provided a binary conclusion: you're either a shill, OR the reason this bulls hit gets any play. I maintain that assertion, you ass.
What out of context, thats BULLSHIT, plain and simple. He's on TWO different shows where he talks about pederasty, gets called out BOTH times, and still proceeds to talk about how WONDERFUL a experience it is for the sexually mature 13-yr old. That's fucking sick. That's not out of context, it's not deceptively edited, it's Milo's fucking words.
I maintain that assertion, you ass.
Oh dear, I think someone on the internet doesn't like me, whatever will I do?!1?
He was CLEARLY molested as a child/teen. Relating his story as something he considered as positive, making jokes out of it, and normalizing it, is all behaviour of those people that were victims of abuse. You might want to think twice about your motives here, because the broad scope is there will likely be a great many victims coming forward soon. They will need some compassion. Even the spawn of the evil Sandusky deserves some degree of sympathy. No excuses certainly. But this behavior is a generational thing, a proven systemic thing, and we have the potential to, if not eradicate it completely, have it front and centre on everyone's radar. Ending the coordinated predation of children is the aim here. Let's maintain focus on who the true enemies are. You fag.
by this logic, Corey Feldman is protecting paedophiles in hollywood too, since he knows who diddled Haim (and the parties, etc) but won't say who it/they are.
Very observant of you. Though I'd be inclined to give Corey a pass as they were the people that actually molested him. I think the reason Milo is saying nothing might be because be participated ... rather than just watched. Unclean hands ....
Was he questioned? I don't know that he was. And he came out and said there were very young boys at those Singer parties. He made that really clear. That they were too young to be there.
I don't care if he was. He was a writer, with a platform and could have called them out. He chose not to, for whatever reason.
And he came out and said there were very young boys at those Singer parties. He made that really clear. That they were too young to be there.
That is PRECISELY my point. So why not name names? Who is he protecting ... and why? That's what I cannot get past. If he wants to atone for his 'sins', that would be a perfect catalyst to do so. So, I see it one of two ways, either they didn't really happen and he was lying to get attention of some kind, or he's clearly protecting pedo's. I cannot see it any other way.
I have the same reservations, but I don't mean at the time of the interview. I mean, now. I would have called out the press on hounding me when (name one Hollywood pedo) and (name two of another Hollywood pedo) are actually molesting children and not talking about it.
I'd imagine that if he's gunna hit back, he can't do it while employed at Breitbart, hopefully its gunna be a nuclear winter! I'd imagine some sort of poetic justice is in order.
The answer to you question as to why we are not heard is that the whole mainstream media, the NeoCon GOP establishment, the Democratic establishment, the elites, and Internet shills are all pushing this Milo story, whereas, pizzagate is a grass roots movement being silenced by those previously stated powerful groups.
I suppose, but we did elect Donald Trump. We are over half the country. It's hard to marginalize that many people, but, yeah, we do not count! We are the ones that caused trouble for the cannibal elite and we have to pay by being ignored.
Well, not really half the country. Half of the country didn't vote. And I wasn't talking about Trump supporters either, I was talking about the pizzagate movement. Which, is much smaller than the Trump movement. It's easier for them to ignore us, expecially because they just dismiss us as a small group of crazy people.
Is it smaller? But what you're saying isn't logical because this "non-margnalized" group didn't rise up over Podesta using code words, or Luzzatto throwing underage grandchildren in the pool, or even when JA made vulgar/despicable remarks. That was fine, by Milo talking about his past upset them?
What are you saying? I'm saying that we are not heard because the pedo elites control the media and the major political factions. This Milo thing hurts the Trump/Outsider/Pizzagate movement. That's why there is all this attention and outcry.
All of this "stuff" really has been coming back to boomerang on the NWO/Elitist/Satanist pedo gang..I would guess this will be no different...just watch! Almost like every move they make that seems like progress ends up double backfiring on them. So, not that I am over sympathetic to "milo", regrettably his previous statements and his mouth got him in trouble, but stuff like this that seems a victory has historically boomeranged..lets see!
Because he hasn't allowed his homosexuality to undermine his logic and reasoning. Milo, an articulate, outspoken, popular gay conservative, is a threat to the popular narrative that conservatives are homophobic. Well, conservatives have accepted Milo as they do anyone else, which serves to discredit this baseless accusation of homophobia. If people notice this they will begin to question the Left and if what they have been told is credible. And if conservatives aren't homophobes, well maybe they aren't racist or sexist or bigots. What is the Left without these accusations?
He's a bullshit artist that is stringing people along for fame and money. I don't give 2 shits if he is gay or straight, bullshit is bullshit. Gee I wonder why he was "told to wait" to talk about pizzagate? It couldn't be to closer coincide with his book release he thought he was going to have before his mouth fucked him right out of it. You guys need to be way more critical of people that stand to make a buck from all this.
Simply because
you
don't care that he's gay does not mean others don't as well. The masses have shown to care a lot about other people's sexual preferences. I'm not disputing your claims here. Honest. But to think Milo was targeted for being a "bullshit artist that is stringing people along for fame and money" is dumb. He was hated for what he brought to the table. Whether it was authentic or not matters very little because people were responding positively to the sentiment and I'm sure there were some confused by a homosexuals apparent advocation for conservatism considering what they 'know' to be 'true' of conservatives. Do you get what I'm saying? He was not targeted for being an attention mongering manipulator. He was targeted for sharing his, for a gay person, unorthodox political beliefs with a massive audience and this poses a threat to the global establishment's agenda. Again, has Milo done some selfish things? Yeah. No one is disputing this. But this isn't why they pursued him.
Sure. I agree with that. He should have exercised some discretion, no doubt.
But
, I do not think Milo was advocating for pedophilia. I simply don't get that message from him. He's spoken of the relationships between young teenage boys and adult men and the potential for it to produce some good but again it doesn't come across as being supportive of pedophilia, at least to me. Milo's clearly an abused man who copes with having been molested by making light of it through jokes. Is he suffering from arrested development or may he have a psychological disorder? Probably. But is he a pedophile? I think that's yet to be determined and until then, people shouldn't be so quick to assume.
I don't think most people are accusing him of being a pedophile himself. But I think he's just trying to play the victim card to get out of this shit he got himself into. He let the fame go to his head and thought he was bulletproof. I just really don't see how anyone can try to defend what he said and not realize why people want to put themselves as far away from him as possible now.
I don't think Breitbart started this, but I think they're overplaying to get the media on-board to lock in their position about pedophilia. There may be some real incriminating shit in Vault 7 and the media can't walk back their statements today if stuff does come out tomorrow.
Sounds like an interesting gambit, if the MSM is stupid enough to attempt to attack Milo for his words being twisted, then they will have to take the news on pizzagate seriously if news does come out. They won't be able to say, well Milo's pedo situation is serious but this isn't otherwise it would destroy MSM.
I really hope you are right because it just seems like it's always one step forward and two steps back. For example, these places that just burned in Virgina and Texas that are suspicious to the pgate community--yet there is nothing about it in the mainstream media am I correct? his is how they are fake news. They leave out the real story every time.
Exactly what I was thinking. Our enemies might be happy with the elimination of Milo, but in the process they have cemented the notion that even a whiff of pedophilia is grounds for banishment. So when evidence is presented, it will be harder for the accused to talk their way out of it. I wonder if Lena Duham or George Takai are crowing about this?
Of course they don't. But around the public's opinion of the media is at an all-time low. Not everybody likes Lena Dunham, and that gives some ammunition to the millions of folk who don't like her SJW opinions.
I hate to say you're right. Everyone is about to have a bad time if they think this "do as I say, not as I do" group gives a shit about the right sacrificing Milo.
I have come to the same conclusion. The timing is not a coincidence. They could've pulled this out of their hat long ago. Now everyone looking for Milo's scalp will be forced to face an even worse truth. What will they do then?
ignore all of this because it is a distraction pure and simple. The Pedophile brigade knows their shit is about to hit the fan, this was to throw blame at Milo to distract from what they are about to get.
I don't see him as a spokesperson. I see him as someone that says outrageous things ... almost a Roseann Barr type, but completely different in other ways. I wanted to hear what he had to say. Then there's what he knows. Remember he was told to wait to talk about pizzagate ... so what was that about? I'm just trying to process, but I never ever saw him as a spokesperson.
I think Milo's true agenda is yet to be revealed. Don't get me wrong, I agree with a lot of things he says and I respect his stoicism on dealing with certain issues. Nevertheless, I found that "I'm still not allowed to talk about PG" bit really shady. At the time, I thought that was completely staged and planned on advance as a publicity stunt.
That's because he is a slave. That's why he can't be the face of anything important. Milo, I have another message for you: Get an anonymous account on
v/pizzagate
and get to work like the rest of us. You've made a splash with your first amendment rights. Now start practicing your second amendment rights, and start publishing the Truth, with TOTAL Freedom from your previous handlers.
lmao you think milo is going to be investigating this? he's a gay jew. the key to pizzagate is investigating gay jews. having milo investigate this is like matt damon investigating for a mole in the departed. and until this board acknowledges the JQ, this investigation will go nowhere
What I'm saying is that he is no more powerful than you or I. He is a distraction, at best. A CIA agent, perhaps. And controlled opposition
a priori
or
a posteriori
--the last of which matters only to his own ego and salvation.
I don't know what to make of him as a person, but he sure is confident. Either way, last night after all this broke out I realized that we (myself included) need to stop worshiping false idols.
There are 100's of subjects we can be researching but we have an OutCRY about David Seaman last week, and MILO this week.
I really don't think these people matter.
That isn't the point. The point is that this "public outcry" over statements got him to resign ... overnight! We pizzagaters have been doing the same. Now why do we not constitute a "public outcry" that demands something be done? How come when they orchestrate a "public outcry", a demonstrable result occurs. Do you see JA being forced to resign from any of his ridiculous jobs? How many does he have? A thousand? THE MAN HAS SIX VOTER ID REGISTRATIONS!!! You think they could get him on that!!! I am pissed!
I mean, the next time they put Alefantis into the spotlight, spam the shit out of every conservative and liberal commentator.
But this Milo "public outcry" didn't come out of nowhere. It happened because he just announced he was slated to speak at CPAC this week, a very visible forum. He said some shit too far and got burned. All of his other 'politically incorrect' statements were the ones that got him invited to CPAC.
The difference is that we don't have 6 tv networks, 22 news channels and billions to spend on paying those who control the narrative to say 'public outcry' !
It's sad, but true. We have allowed the media to take control over all.
IMO the more attention we give to MILO, the more control we give them over us giving af about him and their narrative.
Thinking this game is a fair one can only make one depressed.
Milo is likely controlled opposition. That's the problem with putting a face on any movement.
Let's stop idolizing ANYBODY. There are only unsung heros--like actual victims of child abuse. We must keep working for the real heros, and snub the trance that the public seems to attach to so often. I mean, come on sheeple, you're as predictable as cats at a laser show! Time to stop being hypnotized by the holograms.
I feel like we're starting to go down a path like the faceless men on Game of Thrones. What's next, we will refer to ourselves in the third person? A girl wonders.
Trump and Milo as controlled opposition is laughable. No, they're nationalists, and directly opposed to the transnational political establishment that everyone is trying to pull out of.
"An egoless society with no heros" is literally communist idealism. No. Different individuals possess unique and sometimes exceptional qualities. That is a fact that should be exploited to do good.
If they are not controlled opposition
a priori
, then they will become controlled opposition
a posteriori
.
Nationalism, like our forefathers' idea of a republic, is
on the
along one possible
pathway to true anarchy (not the definition of anarchy that has been psyoped by the CIA).
Communism has to do with distributed wealth, which has nothing to do with worshiping false idols.
I think a better term for what you were reaching at with "anarchy" is
despotism
. This is true, but there are many paths from nationalism. I think the media/establishment would have you believe despotism is the only possible path. Historically that is nonsense, and we should pay attention to policy and how that plays into what dogs everyone has in this fight.
You are so wrong. Trump nationalism includrs protectionist ecomonic policy, which us diametrically opposed to the transnational corporatists controlling our politics and media. He's rejecting free trade deals, instating terriffs, and giving out small business loans. Thats a MASSIVE shift we haven't had in decades.
Marxist communism 100%
requires
social propaganda that minimizes the individual to replace with collectivism. Usually referred to as "reprogramming."
OK, I'm here to learn too, so help me understand your points. Nationalism isn't the same as adjective-nationalism (where adjective = Trump), so help me understand that point, unless you think I'm not understanding nationalism altogether.
I have no problem with individualism. I celebrate individualism. But what I've realized is that people worship certain individuals. That is what people need to stop doing.
Of course, any archon (government) requires mind control. Government literally means mind control:
From the Latin dictionary..
govern -> guberno, gubernare, gubernavi, gubernatus -> control
ment -> mens, mentis -> mind
So, I have no problem with your requirements for Marxist communism.
Edit: Also, I think your Trump-nationalism could be better understood as capitalist-nationalism (if that helps).
My bad, just noticed all the typos, I was in traffick. Really shouldn't have been texting.
I only say Trump nationalism because nationalism, by virtue of heritage, comes in different forms. As an example, Japanese nationalism resulted in something very different than German nationalism.
Trump's brand of nationalism is a rebirth of what allowed this nation to industrialize. Protectionist capitalism. By increasing the tax on imports, you encourage domestic industry while giving a big fuck you to free trade. Free trade is not neccessarily bad, but the current billionaire regime it supports is deplorable.
Why would they be so quick to destroy their own controlled opposition? They hate Milo because as an outspoken, gay conservative, he's an anomoly. His very existence poses a threat to the narrative that conservatives are homophobic. It causes people to think 'maybe conservatives aren't racist, bigot, sexist homophobes,' and without this the Left has nothing left. They took Milo out.
See that is what I have been saying. I have a family member, a brother, that is gay, and flamboyantly gay at that, and he is also a conservative too. My mom actually kicked him out of her home when she found out he voted for Trump, her being a mindless Democrat that voted for Obama both times. The elites do not want people like Milo or my brother around, because they are part of a new generation of conservatives that do not fit their own narrative or mode. They hate individualism at any cost because then that humanizes people. Like for instance that one girl that had the video about how they murdered new born babies. They didn't even give a chance to that baby having a name because they do not want to people to be the very things that they are, human beings that have a right to live, a right to be treated decently, a chance to grow up and love and make the whole damn circle of life man. They want to even allow people to kill a baby at 20 weeks pregnant and beyond but I won't discuss my feelings on the whole matter any longer.
I think you are greatly overestimating the intelligence of the media and the elites if you think Milo is controlled opposition. They were genuinely flabbergasted by Trump's victory and really don't have this Batman style preparedness and foresight that you think. If he were controlled opposition they wouldn't spend thousands of dollars trying to dig up dirt on him.
We had Clinton bleach bit her emails, use a private gmail account, Podesta had his password be p@ssword, etc. That isn't even getting into the Podesta's and Alefantis brazenly putting up demented child-sexualizing artwork for the world to see. These people are not that smart and they have hubris coming out the ass. Their biggest strength is intimidation and violence not intellect.
Fighting for the faceless, nameless, aspect of this is not totally different than defending Milo because he is the victim of some shit here.
Letting them tear him down is a bit wrong. Lots of victims. They deserve justice. He might not deserve all the attention he wants. But he deserves justice and equality.
Yeah I think it looks like a good move, the msm are throwing their weight around at the minute and its almost always backfiring it's probably best to let them continue being the aggressors.
With a guy like him, i expect him to annoy me with how well he apologizes and orchestrates his comeback. I basically read him as Dennis from Always Sunny but pretty likeable and consistent.
Not a huge fan but he's clearly the victim here. That's a dangerous stage for the left to set.
Edit: also, with Flynn as well, the culture of willing bullet biting is undeniably admirable. With the other side it didn't happen until Wikileaks revealed she stole the election from Bernie and she never apologized. Honorable(instant) stepping down and drawing fire away from the man is Samurai as fuck. And the perfect mindset to fight these fucking babies.
▼ DeathToMasons
No more Milo/Seaman/Alex Jones...Enough.
▼ Long_Knife
That's pretty unoriginal. /v/voatstarterpacks ?
▼ Long_Knife
triggered
▼ privatepizza
I hope that's the case.
▼ SpikyAube
These days a 'public outcry' really means 'a media cry.' They always do this, say things like 'there has been backlash from the public over..' or 'the public outcry' or 'public opinion' 'public pressure' etc, and they always mean the people in their social and professional circles. There is an actual real public outcry over the elite pedophilia child trafficking ring, but they ignore it because really they don't think anyone else matters.
▼ quantokitty
Spot on. Completely agree. It's why internet "fake" news outlets sprang up ... to get what's really going on to be highlighted in some way.
▼ BowDownB4Trump
Milo is so much bigger than breitbart. He is a one man army. Thats why they went after him so hard. He destroyed idenity politics.
▼ quantokitty
You may well be right. I'm reserving judgment. These coming days will show what he's really like. It will also show if he had an agenda. If he was involved in child abuse, it could be it was Breitbart's way of dealing with the situation and getting rid of him. They don't want him getting wind of what they're doing, and they couldn't fire him under normal circumstances because of his cult following. This was the perfect storm to send him on his way. Of course, that's only one way of looking at it. I really don't know. It could be he was involved in the older man/younger teen syndrome because of his early abuse. It's illegal, but not the same as cannibal predators who routinely groom, ravage, and molest children. I'm not saying the former is right, I'm just saying it's not the same. We're looking for people that groom and target and victimize. And the proof that even this notion of a beneficial older man/younger teen alliance is blown out of the water by Milo's own distortion of what rape is. The child is not driving the car. Is not. Never ever. It's just his way of dealing with the victimization and the lies told to him. There's a backstory to this that I'm not saying. Someone I met that espouses the same views. She's not a predator, she's a victim and, yet, she holds this peculiar view about children being the provocateurs and controlling the situation. It was just her way of coping for the years of abuse she suffered.
▼ witch_doctor1
I agree with this and wrote a long post kinda at the end of this thread...did you see it? I'm trying to explore this very issue in a rational way without the usual emotion because I have a real problem with the willy-nilly use of the term pedophile. It's kinda like calling everybody Hitler, and dilutes the evil that those words should rightfully convey.
And the importance is that an adult who engages in sexual relations with a post-pubescent minor should be either jailed, put on probation or maybe counseling depending upon the situation, but I believe they can be reformed.
But an adult who seeks out sexual relationships with pre-pubescent children should either be imprisoned for life or receive the death penalty, because the statistics support that the true pedophiles cannot be reformed.
▼ quantokitty
No, I don't think I saw it. I agree with the lumping of all cases together. There should be some kind of degrees of pedophilia, in a similar manner to murder. I don't think a twenty-year-old who meets a seventeen-year-old and engages in a sexual relationship is the same as a predator who deliberately seeks out children by volunteering for an afterschool program (or similar activity) so they can groom a child and terrorize/coerce them before they molest them to be the same. It's not the same thing. I'd have to do more reading and statistical analysis before I broke it up the way you did. Didn't Sandusky target post-pubescent children? If so, the model you propose falls apart. If anyone should have been imprisoned for life/sterilized/duct taped, it would have been that asshole. And I agree with the analogy you used. Not everyone that does something bad is Hitler. But we really need to rid the world of these large, concerted cabals that prey on children. Anyone involved in a group like this should be given a life sentence without the possibility of parole. I don't care what they actually did. They helped perpetuate a monster.
▼ witch_doctor1
Like I said I am working on it...this is an emotional and difficult issue and there are so many variables...I agree that Sandusky is an evil monster and he deserved the death penalty, and his preferred target age was 8-12 (pre-pubescent), therefore, pedophile by definition. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Sandusky I am thinking "statutory rapist" would be a good term for someone who has sex with a post-pubescent minor.
▼ quantokitty
Well, I guess my point is that there should also be some division into this being a one-time occurrence and someone that is perniciously, relentlessly, and willfully targeting young sexual partners. Or anyone working within a human trafficking cabal. I would think there should be more severe charges for that.
▼ witch_doctor1
Agree totally when it comes to statutory rape that there could be extenuating circumstances...like a 20 year old hooks up with 16 year old that lied about her age. That happens all the time and I feel sorry for those guys. Or how about some hot looking teen seduces an older man...that happens all the time too....as I mentioned in my longer post it is totally normal in a biologic sense to think she looks good naked. What makes it wrong is that the adult should know better because that 16 year old is not emotionally or mentally mature enough to consent to that relationship.
And that bring us to the pure evil that is a pedophile....there is nothing sexual about a child...and those who become aroused around a small child are just evil plain and simple. If there is irrefutable evidence of an adult raping a small child or engaging in human trafficking...I say life in prison..those people can't be rehabilitated IMO.
▼ quantokitty
No, no, no. This doesn't happen all the time and we're not on the same page here.
▼ witch_doctor1
You would be surprised how much this occurs, especially if there has been sexual abuse in the home..remember, sexually acting out inappropriately is one of the ways that prior sexual abuse can manifest....again, not condoning it in any way shape or form, but it does happen. And yes, the adult male bears the blame and it should not be excused....however; I don't think life in prison is the appropriate punishment for this one.
▼ quantokitty
I do. And a child acting out is that -- a child acting out -- emphasis on "child".
▼ witch_doctor1
Yes, just sometimes in an adult body...couple that with an adult that does not seek out age appropriate relationships, and then you have problems.
▼ quantokitty
No, a child in a forty-year-old body isn't going to cut it. You've lost me.
▼ witch_doctor1
No, other way around, think Courtney Stodden, child in an adults body...but I'll keep working on it and create separate thread when I'm done...important IMO that we define this in a way that we can all rationally discuss and digest, because we are likely to soon see some truly horrific stuff...
▼ quantokitty
You've bought the excuse hook, line, and sinker. You know what? If these "adults" are children, then take away their driver's licenses, credit cards, voting rights, the ability to sign contracts, get married, and anything else to do with being an adult. I don't see any of them doing that, do you? Nope! They run pizza shops, play the fool, and have instagram accounts where they say vulgar things to impress vulgar friends. Let's strip them of everything and then we'll see who really is a child and who just wants to pretend to be one so they can indulge in criminal behavior. Whatever.
▼ witch_doctor1
I wasn't saying that, I think you misunderstood me...
▼ TheOA
I'm apparently not allowed to comment on this thread ... My comment has been deleted 4 times... I have to speak very lightly and subliminally to even get a word in... Here's my hint: Milo likes kids, and he's very open about it.
▼ thegenericoperator
Provide fucking links with direct quotes. You can't, you cunt. Are you going to ignore humor like the left does and bring up JOKES to support your position? What a terrible person you have to be to victim blame.
▼ quantokitty
Your comments are deleted? Actually, I see at least one ... let me look for more ... No, I see the other ones. Even the one that starts: "Is anyone actually paying attention? Milo has been caught red handed making clear pedophile statements ..." Well, if he is then he deserves to be called on it. From what I've heard of him talking about his youth, it sounds like he was molested and is believing the lies that his sexuality was just too strong. It's pretty sad. As for his other comments, I'm really not a follower of his so I haven't heard everything. But I did hear the remarks about teachers and students and think the ideas expressed as indefensible, but that's me. As for the comments, I don't think your comments were deleted. The Voat comment hierarchy is wonky and random. They get shifted so sometimes they're easier to find using "find". But sometimes "find" doesn't even work because they get hidden.
▼ PizzaGate711
We don't have the media in our pockets.
▼ TheOA
REPOST: Is anyone paying attention? Milo is an on the record Pedophile... He is on the record stating he advocates sexual relationships with boys/girls that are 13 years old. What's going on here at Voat is a CLEAR cover up... I'm both amazed and baffled as I've never seen this much censorship in-front of my face as I post. This is being discussed and censored here https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1666140
▼ thegenericoperator
SHILL ALERT wwwwooooooooooooopppp SHILL ALERT victim blaming shill alert!
▼ thegenericoperator
First of all, anyone who likes that stupid Netflix show (theOA) enough to make that their screen name, seems like a VERY dumb person. Are you rewatching LOST too, you time wasting worm? Enough with the OA.
▼ quantokitty
No, your comment is here. I responded to the last one you posted.
▼ TheOA
Touche. They were insta-getting lost in the chaos of comments. Thanks.
▼ southartful
Excellent, yhis is full blown phoenix mode. Well played milo, well played.
▼ madmanpg
Here's what's important - and what everyone is missing.
The people who are attacking Milo don't give a shit about pedophilia. They give a shit that he is a controversial figure who says extremely politically incorrect things that resonate with young people and empower them to resist the programming they've been subjected to by both the media and the government.
So, they want him to shut up. This is how they do that.
Remember they want to shut us up, too. If you cheer or dismiss this onslaught against Milo, you are cheering the same forces that will come to destroy every one of us in due turn.
▼ quantokitty
I sort of like this. Yes, we don't have to agree 100% to be on the same side.
▼ gardenofbacchus
This is spot on. These same people will, despite having evidence shoved in their face, despite having literal admissions from these people that they rape and murder children, defend the Clintons, Podestas, Hollywood etc. because they're all part of the same political alignment. That's all they care about. That's what satanism/luciferianism/Saturnism is - it's complete self-obsessed narcissism to the point of literal delusion. As long as these brainwashed, lobotomized, virtue signalling leftist freaks feel like they're part of the "right" crowd, the crowd that makes them feel good about themselves and only themselves , they don't care about anything .
Hillary could eat a live baby out the front of Berkley and the students would stand around clapping and then try and kill the guy who comes in and tries to stop it if he was wearing a MAGA hat.
▼ madmanpg
Hmmm...just found this on 8chan: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/4117dee7ad1fbd153f83532abb70b94588def2b850d33df5ea9db3a838ad9c35.jpg
▼ EllenPaosEgo
That is cuckchan, debunked as reporters started to talk about the milo video the day before that post, and you are forgetting rules 1 and 2.
▼ madmanpg
Rules 1 and 2 of what?
▼ OpenSoulOpenMind
fightclub, duh
▼ TheOA
Is anyone actually paying attention? Milo has been caught red handed making clear pedophile statements. A video emerged of him discussing and condoning sexual relations with children as young as 12 years old... He is an avid supporter of young-boy to adult-man sex... This is currently being discussed and actively suppressed here on Voat https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1666140
▼ rooting4redpillers
From the Brietbart Insider FB page:
Clarification from the Editor:
There has been some #FakeNews floating around purporting that Milo Yiannopoulos has been fired or pressured to resign from Brietbart Insider.
This is not the case. At no time did was Yiannopoulos fired, nor did anyone on our team pressure Yiannopoulos to terminate his contract with us.
We look forward to reporting on Yiannopoulos' business ventures, and public events in the future.
— Brietbart Insider
▼ OrwellKnew
Good riddance - dramatic faggot
▼ gangpressorliber
Ultimate Toll, even on the way out.
▼ ComesWithTheFall
"public outcry"
This goes to show how powerful the globalist propaganda machine is. It facilitates entirely filtering out events, tailoring perspective of events to fit a narrative, or completely manufacturing events.
Think of every major news event from the 2000's or 1990's. All of these were carefully managed. All of them. Most of us were none the wiser.
They manipulate our perceptions and our culture. They aggressively control our perception of what "the majority" believes. If you think outside of their sandbox, you are always alone. This is what Trump is fighting.
I'm sure most Swedes deep down know that immigration is ridiculously out of control. But they won't dare admit it, because they think they're alone. They think everyone else will see them as racist. And they probably will, because that's what "the majority" thinks. It controls reality.
▼ gardenofbacchus
Yep. It's the biggest psy-op in human history.
▼ IlluminatiKing
Call me crazy, but this might be a good thing, Milo has to answer to no one now and can freelance, spreading whatever message he wants. Sometimes you got to take advantage of the cards you are dealt.
▼ quantokitty
You could be right. Best way to find out what he really is is to see how he handles this.
▼ Bolux
Or he will fade away into nothingness,you will probably read about his drug induced suicide in the next couple of years,do you know who you are fucking with here.
▼ IlluminatiKing
IDK. The whole smear may have backfired. http://m.imgur.com/izmwHeL
▼ Long_Knife
What do you mean they aren't providing the quote? There is video of him saying this shit posted everywhere. Obviously network news stations can't air clips of what he said but it's all over the place. It isn't like it isn't posted all over the place by now. No matter what he tries to say to get himself out of that when you listen to what he says you can't blame people, especially companies trying to make money, from getting as far away from him as possible.
▼ TheOA
This will show you all you need to know on why Milo resigned, and why this "new" evidence isn't really new. This was all orchestrated. And frankly Milo is a pedophile. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD064D-yr44
▼ witch_doctor1
No, he's not...pedophiles prey on pre-pubescent children. Milo has never done that or advocated that.
▼ TheOA
So we're here researching Clinton and Epstein's horrific nature. You're telling me if it turned out there was solid proof of Clinton having sex with a 13 year old that you wouldn't pull the Pedophile card? Come on. Any sane person knows sex with a 13 year old is not okay, and only a pedophile would morally accept or encourage sex from someone that just reached puberty.
▼ witch_doctor1
This is a complicated issue because there is so much emotion wrapped around it...what gets lost in the discussion is a true pedophile vs. someone who has sex with a post-pubescent minor that is under the legal age of consent. What we are likely to see soon are videos of someone holding down a screaming or drugged child <10 years old and raping them...that is pedophilia, and nowhere close to what Milo was talking about.
When you are talking minors who are post-pubescent but not of the legal age of consent, that is where everyone gets their panties in a knot. The issue is not that you are abhorrent because you see children and become sexually aroused (and yes, those people are truly evil)...because post-pubescent minors are of reproductive age but are not yet mentally or emotionally ready to have sexual relationships, either with adults or peers. I was 5'10', 190 pounds and muscular as a 13 year old...a young teenager's mind in an adult body.
This is why the consent laws aimed at post-pubescent minors are essentially about addressing coercion or abuse of power...in other words, that 16 year old girl with big boobs may look 18, but she's not, and while you would not be abnormal for thinking she looks good naked, you would still be abusing her by being an adult and having sex with someone who is not mentally or emotionally mature enough to consent to that relationship. Another example of this, is most states have laws that teachers cannot have sex with their students, even if they are over the age of 18...and why is that? It is the coercion and abuse of power thing.
The point is that attraction to post-pubescent females or males is normal, but the age of consent laws directed at this age group are designed to protect immature minors in adult bodies from consenting into sexual relationships that they are not yet capable of consenting. Hence the term "statutory rape". And that is the problem I have with loosely calling Milo a pedophile...he is not a pedophile because he is not attracted to pre-pubescent boys. Did you miss the part where he said the age of consent laws were about right? His views on young male/older male relationships are warped because he was statutorily raped. In his mind, he consented and it felt good at the time...but in reality he was taken advantage of by a priest when he was too young to consent in an adult manner. Additionally, when he spoke of the younger male/older male relationships in a positive light, he was referencing his first serious relationship with a 29 year old when he was 17.
Milo is not the enemy, nor is he a pedophile...
▼ quantokitty
Yeah, those are really stupid, stupid remarks. Not going to defend him ... not.
▼ gardenofbacchus
Wow this video is absolutely 100% spot on. Summarises the whole situation perfectly. Milo was definitely abused.
▼ quantokitty
Breitbart? You're not going after the fake news people calling them fake news? They're the ones that precipitated this fall. Andrew started pizzagate. He put his finger on Podesta and everyone ignored him until the leak. Bad on us.
▼ Freemasonsrus
I think Milo may have chosen the resignation. As far as I can tell Breitbart has served its usefulness for him anyways. He can go out on his own and start his own thing just like Andrew Breitbart did. He will survive this and get even bigger.
But yes you're correct in pointing out that there haven't even been social consequences to these pedos yet.
▼ quantokitty
Well, we'll see together ... have no idea what he will or will not do. If there is a long-range plan, he'll most likely keep a low profile.
▼ Bolux
There is nothing overnight about this, they have been planning this for before the Rogan "sketch".Unfortunately I am that jaded by now I wouldn't be surprised if Rogan was part of it.I think milo ws half in the bag ,probably did a big growler and shot his mouth.CIA anyone,they have figured how to blackmail bigger fish than this idiot.Set him up and then the big fall, the orchestred riots ,the MSM,exposure,it's almost too easy,hope you enjoyed your 15 second of fame, Bah bye.
▼ quantokitty
Astute observations. Good stuff.
▼ Bolux
I hope I'm completely wrong,but after 15+years of 911 Bullshit and the rest it's hard to think any different,hopefully this is the one (and the most heinous one ) that breaks the camels back.
▼ equineluvr
I always considered Milo to be a plant to lead the GOP off the cliff. His "pedo apologia" interview was bad enough, but it was his BATHING IN BLOOD that led me to believe that he must be "one of THEM."
▼ quantokitty
You could be right. I guess I want the truth to get out. I want definitive proof out there. And this is so hypocritical. Uber hypocritical.
▼ adam_danischewski
He probably got pressured to resign because of the pressure of him working at Breitbart and making those types of statements was putting on the Trump administration.
▼ rkozzy
This. Especially with Bannon at the helm and his affiliation to Breitbart. Their focus is on the broader picture, so when associates are compromised, they just have to take their lumps, move on, and avoid the pitfalls. The same goes with Flynn's resignation. He likely did nothing wrong but was in a compromising position that gave the opposition leverage. There are casualties in every war.
▼ quantokitty
Yes, this could be a long-range plan. You don't do something crazy and jeopardize anything. You could be right.
▼ DustyRadio
I have been pointing out the hypocrisy re: Dunham all day. Been getting blocked left and right. That nasty skank shouldn't be relevant to anyone, but she has a show on HBO FFS
▼ eyeVoated
Yes, absolutely. Many of us are victims of child abuse. I was verbally abused at the flip of a coin and beaten fairly often. In one such example, I have permanent hearing loss due to being smacked upside the head, and it took me many years to recover to function socially. We are all unsung heroes. We have to heal together as a planet.
▼ theHubrisOfMan
I think the whole thing, Milo's rise and resignation, has been a huge PsyOp. How are we not all super skeptical of an alt-right, nigger-loving, faggot, jew telling the young rights what they want to hear?
▼ Barry_McCochiner
You again. The tough, angry guy, here to make us all look bad.
▼ theHubrisOfMan
what the fuck are you talking about. i represent myself you fucking small minded redditard.
▼ quantokitty
I guess for the same reason JA was One of the Fifty Most Influential People in Washington and The Cannibal Queen won the popular vote.
▼ quantokitty
Yes, it was a smear campaign. Really, he is not the face of pizzagate or even a spokesperson for it. He's never even talked about it! Hardly divide and conquer. And JA isn't obnoxious and didn't ask for it? Look at his instagram! He's also threatened a pizzagater ... allegedly, of course ...
▼ quantokitty
All good points ... especially Dunham and Silverman. They're given passes for being so brave. Brave? About what? Being an asshole?
▼ quantokitty
Another good question. I'm wondering why he didn't at least hit back with, "How dare you say I'm advocating for pedophilia, when I saw (name of Hollywood pedo) and (name of another Hollywood pedo) at Singer's parties with twelve-year-olds? Why aren't you after them?" Now THAT would be a news conference!
▼ DustyRadio
This!! Why isn't he tearing off that curtain!!??!
▼ abortionburglar
Has JA ever publicly said the things Milo did? There's your answer.
▼ quantokitty
Yes, he posted #chickenlover next to a man holding a baby picture. He's also made fun of cooking children, eating children, and of selling babies. That is all in public.
▼ diamond-_sutra
just a thought - if there are arrests coming soon, what Milo has just done is getting everyone thinking about pedophilia and reinforced the idea that it is a serious crime for which there should be repercussions
▼ quantokitty
It could be. But all I know is when pictures from JA's account were posted, the left responded with "WITCH HUNT"!!!! in defense of them. So let me get this straight, a conservative can be held accountability for an unedited video, but an ape can use words like "chickenlover" and start a magazine based on images of abused children can't be held accountability. Further, they should be supported by the community when they are found out with financial assistance. Does this make sense to anyone?
▼ VieBleu
Lee Stranahan of Breitbart denouced pizzagate, Victurus Libertas pissed
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1663368
▼ frankenmine
Breitbart probably gave him a choice of resigning or getting fired and Milo took the dignified option.
▼ quantokitty
But why would they fire him? For something he ddn't advocate?
▼ frankenmine
PR rather than integrity, obviously. Even a suggestion of pedophilia involvement is PR kryptonite.
▼ rkozzy
This. Especially with Bannon at the helm and his affiliation to Breitbart. Their focus is on the broader picture, so when associates are compromised, they just have to take their lumps, move on, and avoid the pitfalls. The same goes with Flynn's resignation. He likely did nothing wrong but was in a compromising position that gave the opposition leverage. There are casualties in every war
▼ madmanpg
It's my opinion that Milo was hit with this bogus line of attack because he was one of the first high-profile people to talk about Pizzagate. I think that because he was willing to talk about it, the decision was to paint him as a pedophile in order to distract away from those he may reveal as being complicit in child sex trafficking.
This is bolstered somewhat by the revelation that the group that targeted Milo was backed by Evan McMullin, the CIA scumfuck who ran for president on the basis that "Trump sucks, the GOP should always back the establishment". Obviously protecting their own.
▼ quantokitty
I'm in agreement with you, or was. That's how I was reading things, but don't understand why he resigned without a fight and naming names.
▼ madmanpg
Why did he resign? I'll counter that with a question: how does he defend himself from this charge? A full media blitz is on to misrepresent him as a defender of pedophilia. What the narrative is taking advantage of, and which Milo has brought up in past(including in the very videos in question) is that fact that in the United States, we have a very puritanical view towards sexuality that makes even discussing sexual concepts in public difficult. While Trump, for example, can clarify or even shift his views on issues like immigration or tax policy to better communicate with the masses, nobody can clarify sexuality-related opinions without being painted as some sort of deviant. Pedophilia IS a reality of sexuality in every country on earth, just as homosexuality and other unconventional sexual practices are; however, too many people in this country cringe or blanche at such discussion, even if it is nothing more than clinical analysis. The Kinsey Report was a notorious example of this. Anyone who discusses sexuality in this country and later on has opinions that challenge the politics of the mainstream media will be presented as some sort of sick raping freak by said media. It's yet another cheap tactic to silence them and prevent them from having any credibility, thus undermining every other message, no matter how noble or important that message may be.
I've experienced this same thing for months within this very movement. We'll have somebody come by with a kid's cartoon from the 80s or 90s, and they'll note some adult humor that was surreptitiously placed in the show, and immediately start claiming that everyone behind the show must have been a kid toucher and needs to be investigated. In fact, these kinds of examples were common back when people making shows knew that adults would be watching shows with their children, and were in fact working to make the show appealing to multiple generations. Myself and many others I know often go back to watch these shows and end up being entertained by the jokes that we completely failed to get as kids(which was by design), but now we understand as adults. The weaving of such humor took a lot of talent, but hypersensitive people will take that juxtaposition and draw something far more sinister out of it. While I understand such fears in light of Pizzagate revelations, I also acknowledge that, unfortunately, such a movement will also breed a certain degree of paranoia.
That kind of paranoia is what is mobilized here against Milo, and anyone here who is dumb enough to think this will be a one-time thing is in for a ride, because since it worked, the media and the pro-government forces will be employing it over and over, until, like the Nazi label, it's dead from overuse.
▼ quantokitty
You raise some good points. But using the excuse something is pervasive is not a way to validate that it's necessarily moral or right. For example, incest, bestiality, rape, murder, torture, and serial killings are also part of every culture and go on all over the world. These are not wholesome or ethical and should be put on an list to try to eradicate. So pointing to 'pedophilia' as being a worldwide concept just doesn't really say anything other than it's a fact. If a child is under twelve, there can't be any possible argument made that molesting this child is in any way shape or form "good". This is especially true of toddlers. The trauma suffered is immeasurable and I've met people and have anecdotal evidence to support this. I also have spoken to psychologists involved in trying to make these victims whole. It's a harrowing process. When you get to the age of 16, it gets dicey as to what is predatory, and what is "good". Teenagers have raging hormones. They get themselves into trouble by thinking they can handle anything when, in fact, they are kids. They don't have the maturity to handle a lot of things they think they can. But does this mean they can't engage in sex? It's why the laws are in place. If they are dealing with children their own age, it becomes a more level playing field. It would be like you or I encountering a ninja in an alley. How do you think we'd come out of that experience? A winner? That said, there are now gangs where peers of these children groom, befriend, and betray them by involving them in sex trafficking. So age is one component in this coming of age and awakening to sex. But so is a level playing field. If someone is targeting another individual and has an agenda that is not healthy, productive, or even totally against what they're espousing all to lure, entrap, and deceive, then, Houston, we have a problem. This is especially true when you have a ring of predators who do this repeatedly and have no heart, compassion, or regret over the breaking of little spirits and lives. Add in doing it for money, and you really put the icing on the proverbial cake. No, pedophilia is not right. It will never be right no matter how many people tell you it is. Per Milo's example, is a 28-year-old involving himself with a 16-year-old the same as an elite pedophile ring like the one that stole Madeleine McCann? We can't say that with certainty. Sandusky was one individual and look how many lives he ruined.. So while you're expressing yourself cogently and eloquently, the kite you're floating won't fly.
▼ EllenPaosEgo
He never did the talk about pizzagate. Unless you count his Joe Rogan interview where he said he went to some Hollywood sex parties with "very very young boys." Milo is a suspect in pizzagate, and should not be the face of pizzagate.
▼ thegenericoperator
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=zBLCRy-Pfn0 him alluding to why he cannot talk about pizzagate.
▼ rivercontrol
Support Milo
https://i.imgtc.com/HluQdwI.png
▼ thegenericoperator
It was staff at Breitbart that had prevented him from doing a talk on pizzagate previously. I'm predicting that we will hear about pizza gate from Milo sooner than later now.
▼ EllenPaosEgo
There was no proof that it was breitbart that stopped milo from doing the speech.
▼ thegenericoperator
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=zBLCRy-Pfn0 this is the proof, his own words on the subject of why he can't do the talk. There. That means it was Breitbart. Not in a "cover up" way, if that's what you thought the insinuation was. I view it as though either Breitbart knew to some degree, and Bannon probably has a plan of how and when, and Milo probably just wants to run with it, regardless of how it plays.
▼ quantokitty
I hope you're right. He might have been going to talk about it at Berkeley. We'll never know. But if was going to say something explosive, he sure didn't use the press conference and this platform shoved underneath him to his advantage. I mean, he probably had all the major news outlets trained on him ... but there may be a plan. There my be something that's coming up that everybody is taking pains not to screw up by saying anything.
▼ thegenericoperator
Just YouTube milo pizza gate. https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=zBLCRy-Pfn0 I think he'll talk soon. The public pressure to name names in regards to the Hollywood parties will be the reason I think. This will ultimately backfire, as has every other attempt to silence this info. When Milo kissed Gavin McInnes at the end of their "fuck islam" press conference after the Orlando gay nightclub Islamic terrorist shooting, when Gavin was ensuring their armed guards were watchin the rooftops (he has children), Milo said he "didn't care", and he'd "happily die for this". That should give you some sense of how he approaches this. I think he truly will burn it down in a blaze of flaming gay glory. That man has changed the paradigm of our time, and won't likely be recognized as such for a generation. The future highschool radicals will wear Milo swag rather than Che hats. Those Che berets are tre gay anyway. Long live the queen.
▼ quantokitty
I hope you're right, but we'll all see together. If he does emerge like Gandalf the White and actually break the silence, it will be monumental.
I think this might be cathartic for him as well. From what he said, he was abused and very much taken advantage, but we'll see. Here's to anyone that wants to come forward and put an end to this pedophile ring. I don't know why people would choose to live under tyrannical rule, and that's what this is. When someone attempts to silence you with blackmail that "you'll never work in Hollywood and/or Washington again," that's blackmail. And Hollywood has gotten so horrible under the pedos rule. They re talentless, non-creative little cretins that put together film and music to fulfill their twisted desires. Can you imagine all the brilliant people that are turned away because they won't go along with and play this sick game? Somebody has to be the one to speak out. The world is waiting.
▼ EndThePizza
He was invited to a high profile conservative conference. It was then discovered he's advocated for pedophilia. Of course it's a huge deal. Of course it's in the news. Of course he was uninvited, lost his job, and lost a book deal over it. That's what happens when you get outed as an advocate of pedophilia.
▼ quantokitty
But he wasn't an advocate. I think people have lost the ability to interpret words. Common core means no common sense. Like "Illegal" immigrant. The left doesn't hear "Illegal". It's pitched like a dog whistle so they never ever hear it. And like this. He said fifty times he didn't advocate it. But that's drifting from the point that (a) the left are genetically incapable of hearing certain words or interpreting them properly; and (b) if the left are all that riled up over people advocating for pedophilia, why are they not after the Podestas, Biden, Luzzatto and JA? Why do they not want their heads on a platter? Which is it? Biden fondled a child's breast in public ... on film ... and there's was no outcry. Instead, the left drew up funny memes of Obama and Biden taking jabs at Trump. I saw enough of them to make me vomit. So you say, "of course". So why not "of course" for the cannibal elite?
▼ EndThePizza
1 Yes he was.
2 It was actually the conservatives that started the outrage.
▼ Rmm
Then again, Milo did try to defend himself on Facebook, but his post kept getting deleted, I read.
▼ wtf_hell
Tinfoil hat:
MSM is using the common irrational fear that gay men are pedophiles to try and sink Milo because he refuses to bend to their will. They know that a good portion of people believe that gay men are secretly pedophiles, so they are using that (and a possibly edited video) to drown the person that threatens them the most.
Milo is always willing to blow the lid off of major scandals and he's very supportive of PGers.
▼ FreeThem
This stuff is career_suicide... You'll get rubbed out immediately.
People's rights are being violated and it seems as if they can't sue. I'd be suing every news outlet.
▼ 0xFFF
Lol, career suicide in the old media maybe. fuck them.
▼ quantokitty
True. But if there's something coming ... and he knows ... he doesn't have to do anything, but resign and let the media firestorm die down. There's so many ways to process this, but only one right way ... we'll all see together.
▼ privatepizza
It's up to him if he resigns, seems he's not such a 'don't give a fuck rebel' after all. Why are we even looking to this attention-grabbing queen, giving him more attention? smh.
▼ p0ssum
Keep in mind that Milo himself is protecting hollywood pedos:
https://youtu.be/oJhHwspZGcg?t=181
▼ thegenericoperator
Now, to make the leap to "protecting Hollywood" pedos from providing personal examples of rampant pedophilia without naming names, is an aggregious attack. Say he were to in fact, name names, as you would have him do, what does that do exactly? Sure, it provides a valid target for fringe "investigators" maybe; but, almost certainly, it would provide Milo with career ending legal fess, and he would be relegated to the same fringes as pizzagators. Just grow up, and play it through. He most likely would have not said ANYTHING on the topic if he was "protecting Hollywood pedos". Your selective clip (out of context) is EXACTLY what this whole media shitstorm has done. You're likely a shill, or THE EXACT REASON THIS SHIT GETS ANY TRACTION.
▼ p0ssum
Yes, anyone that points out facts must be a fucking shill. Got it ....
▼ EllenPaosEgo
Milo admitted to going and engaging in these Hollywood parties. I agree why would anyone defend amilo after that. He has held these stances for many years.
▼ thegenericoperator
You are taking those comments out-of-context. Also, I provided a binary conclusion: you're either a shill, OR the reason this bulls hit gets any play. I maintain that assertion, you ass.
▼ p0ssum
What out of context, thats BULLSHIT, plain and simple. He's on TWO different shows where he talks about pederasty, gets called out BOTH times, and still proceeds to talk about how WONDERFUL a experience it is for the sexually mature 13-yr old. That's fucking sick. That's not out of context, it's not deceptively edited, it's Milo's fucking words.
Oh dear, I think someone on the internet doesn't like me, whatever will I do?!1?
▼ thegenericoperator
He was CLEARLY molested as a child/teen. Relating his story as something he considered as positive, making jokes out of it, and normalizing it, is all behaviour of those people that were victims of abuse. You might want to think twice about your motives here, because the broad scope is there will likely be a great many victims coming forward soon. They will need some compassion. Even the spawn of the evil Sandusky deserves some degree of sympathy. No excuses certainly. But this behavior is a generational thing, a proven systemic thing, and we have the potential to, if not eradicate it completely, have it front and centre on everyone's radar. Ending the coordinated predation of children is the aim here. Let's maintain focus on who the true enemies are. You fag.
▼ Weightstone
by this logic, Corey Feldman is protecting paedophiles in hollywood too, since he knows who diddled Haim (and the parties, etc) but won't say who it/they are.
▼ p0ssum
Very observant of you. Though I'd be inclined to give Corey a pass as they were the people that actually molested him. I think the reason Milo is saying nothing might be because be participated ... rather than just watched. Unclean hands ....
▼ redditsuckz
Yes he is.
(((Corey Feldman)))...(((Corey Haim)))...(((MILO)))...(((Bryan Singer)))...(((HOLLYWOOOD))).
▼ quantokitty
Was he questioned? I don't know that he was. And he came out and said there were very young boys at those Singer parties. He made that really clear. That they were too young to be there.
▼ p0ssum
I don't care if he was. He was a writer, with a platform and could have called them out. He chose not to, for whatever reason.
That is PRECISELY my point. So why not name names? Who is he protecting ... and why? That's what I cannot get past. If he wants to atone for his 'sins', that would be a perfect catalyst to do so. So, I see it one of two ways, either they didn't really happen and he was lying to get attention of some kind, or he's clearly protecting pedo's. I cannot see it any other way.
▼ Rhino7682
Feldman said he went to police and was ignored
▼ quantokitty
I have the same reservations, but I don't mean at the time of the interview. I mean, now. I would have called out the press on hounding me when (name one Hollywood pedo) and (name two of another Hollywood pedo) are actually molesting children and not talking about it.
▼ jonnythaiwongy9
I'd imagine that if he's gunna hit back, he can't do it while employed at Breitbart, hopefully its gunna be a nuclear winter! I'd imagine some sort of poetic justice is in order.
▼ quantokitty
Hope so. Well, you know, in thinking this over, his reaction will tell us all we need to know, won't it?
▼ oiseaulibre
The answer to you question as to why we are not heard is that the whole mainstream media, the NeoCon GOP establishment, the Democratic establishment, the elites, and Internet shills are all pushing this Milo story, whereas, pizzagate is a grass roots movement being silenced by those previously stated powerful groups.
▼ quantokitty
I suppose, but we did elect Donald Trump. We are over half the country. It's hard to marginalize that many people, but, yeah, we do not count! We are the ones that caused trouble for the cannibal elite and we have to pay by being ignored.
▼ srayzie
Democrats have always been ruthless.
▼ oiseaulibre
Well, not really half the country. Half of the country didn't vote. And I wasn't talking about Trump supporters either, I was talking about the pizzagate movement. Which, is much smaller than the Trump movement. It's easier for them to ignore us, expecially because they just dismiss us as a small group of crazy people.
▼ quantokitty
Is it smaller? But what you're saying isn't logical because this "non-margnalized" group didn't rise up over Podesta using code words, or Luzzatto throwing underage grandchildren in the pool, or even when JA made vulgar/despicable remarks. That was fine, by Milo talking about his past upset them?
▼ oiseaulibre
What are you saying? I'm saying that we are not heard because the pedo elites control the media and the major political factions. This Milo thing hurts the Trump/Outsider/Pizzagate movement. That's why there is all this attention and outcry.
▼ pbvrocks
All of this "stuff" really has been coming back to boomerang on the NWO/Elitist/Satanist pedo gang..I would guess this will be no different...just watch! Almost like every move they make that seems like progress ends up double backfiring on them. So, not that I am over sympathetic to "milo", regrettably his previous statements and his mouth got him in trouble, but stuff like this that seems a victory has historically boomeranged..lets see!
▼ quantokitty
Oh, yeah! Can't wait ... I'm hoping he doesn't turn out to be a douchebag asshole.
▼ Melitica
He resigned. Video and transcript both up on Breitbart.
For child sex abuse survivors, his statement will ring true. http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/02/21/full-remarks-milo-delivers-speech-press-conference-amid-video-scandal/
Has a new book deal and will be starting his own venture.
▼ zo34
Links for venture?
▼ plebsareneeded
milo doesnt need breitbart anymore. hes his own brand a la ann coulter
▼ Long_Knife
Why the fuck does anyone give a shit about this guy?
▼ bFuddlez
Because he hasn't allowed his homosexuality to undermine his logic and reasoning. Milo, an articulate, outspoken, popular gay conservative, is a threat to the popular narrative that conservatives are homophobic. Well, conservatives have accepted Milo as they do anyone else, which serves to discredit this baseless accusation of homophobia. If people notice this they will begin to question the Left and if what they have been told is credible. And if conservatives aren't homophobes, well maybe they aren't racist or sexist or bigots. What is the Left without these accusations?
▼ Long_Knife
He's a bullshit artist that is stringing people along for fame and money. I don't give 2 shits if he is gay or straight, bullshit is bullshit. Gee I wonder why he was "told to wait" to talk about pizzagate? It couldn't be to closer coincide with his book release he thought he was going to have before his mouth fucked him right out of it. You guys need to be way more critical of people that stand to make a buck from all this.
▼ bFuddlez
Simply because you don't care that he's gay does not mean others don't as well. The masses have shown to care a lot about other people's sexual preferences. I'm not disputing your claims here. Honest. But to think Milo was targeted for being a "bullshit artist that is stringing people along for fame and money" is dumb. He was hated for what he brought to the table. Whether it was authentic or not matters very little because people were responding positively to the sentiment and I'm sure there were some confused by a homosexuals apparent advocation for conservatism considering what they 'know' to be 'true' of conservatives. Do you get what I'm saying? He was not targeted for being an attention mongering manipulator. He was targeted for sharing his, for a gay person, unorthodox political beliefs with a massive audience and this poses a threat to the global establishment's agenda. Again, has Milo done some selfish things? Yeah. No one is disputing this. But this isn't why they pursued him.
▼ Long_Knife
His own words were his downfall. He has no one to blame but himself. No company worth a shit wants to associate themselves with someone who makes comments like that about pedophilia. https://twitter.com/ReaganBattalion/status/833485040944156673/video/1
▼ bFuddlez
Sure. I agree with that. He should have exercised some discretion, no doubt. But , I do not think Milo was advocating for pedophilia. I simply don't get that message from him. He's spoken of the relationships between young teenage boys and adult men and the potential for it to produce some good but again it doesn't come across as being supportive of pedophilia, at least to me. Milo's clearly an abused man who copes with having been molested by making light of it through jokes. Is he suffering from arrested development or may he have a psychological disorder? Probably. But is he a pedophile? I think that's yet to be determined and until then, people shouldn't be so quick to assume.
▼ Long_Knife
I don't think most people are accusing him of being a pedophile himself. But I think he's just trying to play the victim card to get out of this shit he got himself into. He let the fame go to his head and thought he was bulletproof. I just really don't see how anyone can try to defend what he said and not realize why people want to put themselves as far away from him as possible now.
▼ JrSlimss
I don't think Breitbart started this, but I think they're overplaying to get the media on-board to lock in their position about pedophilia. There may be some real incriminating shit in Vault 7 and the media can't walk back their statements today if stuff does come out tomorrow.
▼ Y8goKTH959VCLKty8xIz
hahaha yea they will
▼ IlluminatiKing
Look at Jullian Assange's personal twitter. Read every quoted word top down on his feed. Someone pointed out a curious message.
▼ sLnTsRvC
I really hope this is this true but just sounds like wishful thinking. Brietbart makes money the same way every news source does.
▼ WanderingMitten
Sounds like an interesting gambit, if the MSM is stupid enough to attempt to attack Milo for his words being twisted, then they will have to take the news on pizzagate seriously if news does come out. They won't be able to say, well Milo's pedo situation is serious but this isn't otherwise it would destroy MSM.
▼ Fatsack
Yeah, this is going to be used to utterly destroy the MSM when they display hypocrisy about pizzagate
▼ Rmm
I really hope you are right because it just seems like it's always one step forward and two steps back. For example, these places that just burned in Virgina and Texas that are suspicious to the pgate community--yet there is nothing about it in the mainstream media am I correct? his is how they are fake news. They leave out the real story every time.
▼ nothingtosee
that would be gigantic shit storm, can't wait to happen
▼ Clinker
Exactly what I was thinking. Our enemies might be happy with the elimination of Milo, but in the process they have cemented the notion that even a whiff of pedophilia is grounds for banishment. So when evidence is presented, it will be harder for the accused to talk their way out of it. I wonder if Lena Duham or George Takai are crowing about this?
▼ Mylon
Please. Lena Dunham is still around. The media doesn't give a shit about precedent.
▼ Clinker
Of course they don't. But around the public's opinion of the media is at an all-time low. Not everybody likes Lena Dunham, and that gives some ammunition to the millions of folk who don't like her SJW opinions.
▼ kingforpres
I hate to say you're right. Everyone is about to have a bad time if they think this "do as I say, not as I do" group gives a shit about the right sacrificing Milo.
▼ LincolnsMullet
I have come to the same conclusion. The timing is not a coincidence. They could've pulled this out of their hat long ago. Now everyone looking for Milo's scalp will be forced to face an even worse truth. What will they do then?
▼ abortionburger
Interesting hypothesis!
▼ je-sui-pepe
ignore all of this because it is a distraction pure and simple. The Pedophile brigade knows their shit is about to hit the fan, this was to throw blame at Milo to distract from what they are about to get.
▼ Aniabub
I dont even know what the hell happened. The incident as to why he resigned i mean. Wont be hard for me to ignore.
▼ SayWhatNOWAY
I have always questioned Milo's real agenda. Never wanted him as a spokesperson for our movement anyway!
▼ quantokitty
I don't see him as a spokesperson. I see him as someone that says outrageous things ... almost a Roseann Barr type, but completely different in other ways. I wanted to hear what he had to say. Then there's what he knows. Remember he was told to wait to talk about pizzagate ... so what was that about? I'm just trying to process, but I never ever saw him as a spokesperson.
▼ SayWhatNOWAY
True he was told to wait. I just hope he is not just stringing us along.
▼ ploppy
rule 1
▼ Newfind
The least he could do was give a shoutout to PG if he was gong down in flames anyway. That's what I would do.
▼ quantokitty
Yes. He was going to give that talk about pizzagate and was told to wait ... and now he's resigned. What was he going to say?
▼ teh_Dude
I think Milo's true agenda is yet to be revealed. Don't get me wrong, I agree with a lot of things he says and I respect his stoicism on dealing with certain issues. Nevertheless, I found that "I'm still not allowed to talk about PG" bit really shady. At the time, I thought that was completely staged and planned on advance as a publicity stunt.
▼ remedy4reality
WELCOME TO THE GRAND ILLUSION !!!
people.... this guy is CIA / I have been saying this for quite some time now.
▼ TabiCatTwo
I'm disappointed he didn't point out that pedophilia is a huge problem in general.
▼ eyeVoated
That's because he is a slave. That's why he can't be the face of anything important. Milo, I have another message for you: Get an anonymous account on v/pizzagate and get to work like the rest of us. You've made a splash with your first amendment rights. Now start practicing your second amendment rights, and start publishing the Truth, with TOTAL Freedom from your previous handlers.
▼ EarlPoncho
lmao you think milo is going to be investigating this? he's a gay jew. the key to pizzagate is investigating gay jews. having milo investigate this is like matt damon investigating for a mole in the departed. and until this board acknowledges the JQ, this investigation will go nowhere
▼ eyeVoated
What I'm saying is that he is no more powerful than you or I. He is a distraction, at best. A CIA agent, perhaps. And controlled opposition a priori or a posteriori --the last of which matters only to his own ego and salvation.
▼ EarlPoncho
ive always thought he was paid opposition
▼ eyeVoated
I don't know what to make of him as a person, but he sure is confident. Either way, last night after all this broke out I realized that we (myself included) need to stop worshiping false idols.
▼ listentoreason2017
WHO. GIVES. A. SHIT.
▼ privatepizza
+1 Yawn.... MILO...
There are 100's of subjects we can be researching but we have an OutCRY about David Seaman last week, and MILO this week. I really don't think these people matter.
▼ quantokitty
That isn't the point. The point is that this "public outcry" over statements got him to resign ... overnight! We pizzagaters have been doing the same. Now why do we not constitute a "public outcry" that demands something be done? How come when they orchestrate a "public outcry", a demonstrable result occurs. Do you see JA being forced to resign from any of his ridiculous jobs? How many does he have? A thousand? THE MAN HAS SIX VOTER ID REGISTRATIONS!!! You think they could get him on that!!! I am pissed!
▼ listentoreason2017
I mean, the next time they put Alefantis into the spotlight, spam the shit out of every conservative and liberal commentator.
But this Milo "public outcry" didn't come out of nowhere. It happened because he just announced he was slated to speak at CPAC this week, a very visible forum. He said some shit too far and got burned. All of his other 'politically incorrect' statements were the ones that got him invited to CPAC.
▼ privatepizza
The difference is that we don't have 6 tv networks, 22 news channels and billions to spend on paying those who control the narrative to say 'public outcry' !
It's sad, but true. We have allowed the media to take control over all.
IMO the more attention we give to MILO, the more control we give them over us giving af about him and their narrative.
Thinking this game is a fair one can only make one depressed.
▼ WakeyWake
Yesterday I saw a voat post titled Breibart was going to fire Milo. Maybe it was a forced resignation?
▼ Ushil
He is probably threatened like Ben Swann to do this.
▼ heretolearn
whatever happened to swann
▼ neurofluxation
Yeah, that or he's "bracing for impact".
▼ eyeVoated
You mean, like, inserting a ball gag as foreplay?
Milo is likely controlled opposition. That's the problem with putting a face on any movement.
Let's stop idolizing ANYBODY. There are only unsung heros--like actual victims of child abuse. We must keep working for the real heros, and snub the trance that the public seems to attach to so often. I mean, come on sheeple, you're as predictable as cats at a laser show! Time to stop being hypnotized by the holograms.
▼ jml1201
Amazing, thank you and I can not stress this enough....
Do not put a face on this movement.....Can we get that trending, that is so critical.
▼ shortymcbossypants
I feel like we're starting to go down a path like the faceless men on Game of Thrones. What's next, we will refer to ourselves in the third person? A girl wonders.
▼ eyeVoated
The Universe is Spoken into Existence.
Spread it like wildfire.
▼ podesta4prison
Trump and Milo as controlled opposition is laughable. No, they're nationalists, and directly opposed to the transnational political establishment that everyone is trying to pull out of.
"An egoless society with no heros" is literally communist idealism. No. Different individuals possess unique and sometimes exceptional qualities. That is a fact that should be exploited to do good.
▼ eyeVoated
If they are not controlled opposition a priori , then they will become controlled opposition a posteriori .
Nationalism, like our forefathers' idea of a republic, is
on thealong one possible pathway to true anarchy (not the definition of anarchy that has been psyoped by the CIA).Communism has to do with distributed wealth, which has nothing to do with worshiping false idols.
▼ podesta4prison
I think a better term for what you were reaching at with "anarchy" is despotism . This is true, but there are many paths from nationalism. I think the media/establishment would have you believe despotism is the only possible path. Historically that is nonsense, and we should pay attention to policy and how that plays into what dogs everyone has in this fight.
▼ podesta4prison
You are so wrong. Trump nationalism includrs protectionist ecomonic policy, which us diametrically opposed to the transnational corporatists controlling our politics and media. He's rejecting free trade deals, instating terriffs, and giving out small business loans. Thats a MASSIVE shift we haven't had in decades.
Marxist communism 100% requires social propaganda that minimizes the individual to replace with collectivism. Usually referred to as "reprogramming."
▼ eyeVoated
OK, I'm here to learn too, so help me understand your points. Nationalism isn't the same as adjective-nationalism (where adjective = Trump), so help me understand that point, unless you think I'm not understanding nationalism altogether.
I have no problem with individualism. I celebrate individualism. But what I've realized is that people worship certain individuals. That is what people need to stop doing.
Of course, any archon (government) requires mind control. Government literally means mind control:
From the Latin dictionary..
govern -> guberno, gubernare, gubernavi, gubernatus -> control
ment -> mens, mentis -> mind
So, I have no problem with your requirements for Marxist communism.
Edit: Also, I think your Trump-nationalism could be better understood as capitalist-nationalism (if that helps).
▼ podesta4prison
My bad, just noticed all the typos, I was in traffick. Really shouldn't have been texting.
I only say Trump nationalism because nationalism, by virtue of heritage, comes in different forms. As an example, Japanese nationalism resulted in something very different than German nationalism.
Trump's brand of nationalism is a rebirth of what allowed this nation to industrialize. Protectionist capitalism. By increasing the tax on imports, you encourage domestic industry while giving a big fuck you to free trade. Free trade is not neccessarily bad, but the current billionaire regime it supports is deplorable.
▼ eyeVoated
I don't know much about this topic, but your argument sounds very reasonable.
▼ podesta4prison
Upvoated for willingness to humour a different view based on reason.
▼ Disgusted-Lurker
Thanks for the "cats at a laser show" bit...
This site gets heavy (for good reason) and it's nice to get a chuckle now and then.
▼ bFuddlez
Why would they be so quick to destroy their own controlled opposition? They hate Milo because as an outspoken, gay conservative, he's an anomoly. His very existence poses a threat to the narrative that conservatives are homophobic. It causes people to think 'maybe conservatives aren't racist, bigot, sexist homophobes,' and without this the Left has nothing left. They took Milo out.
▼ shortymcbossypants
See that is what I have been saying. I have a family member, a brother, that is gay, and flamboyantly gay at that, and he is also a conservative too. My mom actually kicked him out of her home when she found out he voted for Trump, her being a mindless Democrat that voted for Obama both times. The elites do not want people like Milo or my brother around, because they are part of a new generation of conservatives that do not fit their own narrative or mode. They hate individualism at any cost because then that humanizes people. Like for instance that one girl that had the video about how they murdered new born babies. They didn't even give a chance to that baby having a name because they do not want to people to be the very things that they are, human beings that have a right to live, a right to be treated decently, a chance to grow up and love and make the whole damn circle of life man. They want to even allow people to kill a baby at 20 weeks pregnant and beyond but I won't discuss my feelings on the whole matter any longer.
▼ eyeVoated
see my response to @Tanngrisnir
▼ Tanngrisnir
I think you are greatly overestimating the intelligence of the media and the elites if you think Milo is controlled opposition. They were genuinely flabbergasted by Trump's victory and really don't have this Batman style preparedness and foresight that you think. If he were controlled opposition they wouldn't spend thousands of dollars trying to dig up dirt on him.
We had Clinton bleach bit her emails, use a private gmail account, Podesta had his password be p@ssword, etc. That isn't even getting into the Podesta's and Alefantis brazenly putting up demented child-sexualizing artwork for the world to see. These people are not that smart and they have hubris coming out the ass. Their biggest strength is intimidation and violence not intellect.
▼ eyeVoated
The elites are generally unknown (except we speculate that they are the +/- 13 illuminati family/clan/cartels).
The media is a tool of the elites.
Any rising opposition becomes controlled.
That's why a distributed and anonymous front is their biggest threat (that I can think of).
Distributed and anonymous represents the spirit of today's internet, as well as the militia of the republic.
So, what they attack is 1st and 2nd amendment rights, along with individuals that pose a threat.
Edit: same response to @bFuddlez
▼ HighFlyingRambo
UpVoat for your comment about not putting a face on this movement. The face(s) should be US the people of this world .
No politics!!! Just good like minded respectful people gathering together. One Goal!
▼ jml1201
and Upvoat for your comment about his comment. I wish people would really understand how crucial this is.
▼ PizzaStreamerLive
No face. Only a fair and just investigation of what we know as PizzaGate. With all the evidence of wrongdoing. How is this too much to ask?
▼ eyeVoated
Yes, very well put. We need to say this message as many ways as possible.
Get rid of the ego, and reconnect through Unity Consciousness.
▼ grlldcheese
Fighting for the faceless, nameless, aspect of this is not totally different than defending Milo because he is the victim of some shit here.
Letting them tear him down is a bit wrong. Lots of victims. They deserve justice. He might not deserve all the attention he wants. But he deserves justice and equality.
▼ eyeVoated
As far as I can tell, Milo is doing just fine. I'm here for those who cannot speak or defend themselves. EVERYBODY deserves justice and equality.
▼ grlldcheese
This. It's the most defensive play. It saves Bannon the drama. It's probably good.
▼ Atatarkus
Yeah I think it looks like a good move, the msm are throwing their weight around at the minute and its almost always backfiring it's probably best to let them continue being the aggressors.
▼ grlldcheese
With a guy like him, i expect him to annoy me with how well he apologizes and orchestrates his comeback. I basically read him as Dennis from Always Sunny but pretty likeable and consistent.
Not a huge fan but he's clearly the victim here. That's a dangerous stage for the left to set.
Edit: also, with Flynn as well, the culture of willing bullet biting is undeniably admirable. With the other side it didn't happen until Wikileaks revealed she stole the election from Bernie and she never apologized. Honorable(instant) stepping down and drawing fire away from the man is Samurai as fuck. And the perfect mindset to fight these fucking babies.