Here's more hypocrisy for you. Milo says some words. Trump makes a bad joke about sexual assaulting women. Protests, signs, banners, petitions, riots, violence, outrage. Joe Biden is filmed groping and forcing himself on CHILDREN and these same people say nothing.

Tiresome watching YOU shills attempt to pretend he didn't say what he said.

"“The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age [16]. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age "

"Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. "

"some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys. They can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.”"

He says boys younger than 16 can give consent and have "hugely positive experiences" in sexual relationships with adults.

He says he isn't defending pedophilia, because he goes by the actual definition of pedophilia, which means sex with prepubescent children. Pizzagaters absolutely extend the definition to include adolescent teenagers, which is the very group that Milo says can have "hugely positive" sexual relationships with adults.

I was referring to shills not reality

I think this is going to backfire hugely on CIA and Dems. There's something really idiotic about choosing this issue to nail Milo on - they're raising the public's ire re pedophilia just as they're about to have all of their own (way, waaaay worse) pedo skeletons emerge from their giant closet. They may as well just arm the public with pitchforks, tar and feathers. Fools.

nice.

Well it's not like we've got Podesta on tape saying questionable shit about 13 year olds. I do see a difference here.

Milo is a target because of his politics - they will use anything to smear him. I'm not sure what this has to do with pizzagate.

Why object -- any time that the nation's disdain for pedophiles can be made clear is good.

And, something like Milo may move them into having to cover pizzagate. Who knows?

You realize that George Takei admits to being molested as a kid?

Why do people here defend a guy saying adults having sex with 13 year olds is okay?

That's because pizzagate is obviously fake and ridiculous.

How much more damage is Trump going to allow to his presidency before they do something! There is tons of evidence!

Yes the hypocricy is there and it is obvious. But the hypocrisy exist here as well, i am digusted by some of the people here defending milo for what he said and given what we know about him now. He refused to name his molester, allowing him to continue sexually abuse and destroy other childrens lifes. Milo mentioned he was at a party in hollywood where very young boys as he put it was present, did he report it or give names of those at the party? No. But Milo still gets painted as a victim here, a guy who does not name and report pedophiles and thinks that some 13 year olds can give conscent while Sarah Silverman gets called a pedo here for making a pedo joke....You are just giving people who think pizzagate is just a smear campaign against the left more credibility...

It's only cause they have Milo on record with those ruthless comments, no additional investigation is necessary.

Podesta on the other hand requires true investigative work which no one wants to do. They're worse than the basement dwelling neckbeards they talk so much about, but never investigate, since that would reveal that they are no better, just a different label of "office dwellers".

Soros & Co. seem to be taking down a leading alt-right figure every few days. This looks like the game plan.

I lost a "friend" for this. He posted about Milo, and I replied with references to pizza maps, dominoes on cheese vs pasta, etc. He got #triggered about how I "don't care about kids" because of MUH HER TIME and I was partisan and it was debunked, etc.

I had to block him.

Someone please explain this worship of Milo. And read the link. http://www.newslogue.com/debate/349

Hillary camp has close connections to pedos and child traffickers like Laura Silsby, nobody bats an eye.

Gay conservative victim of sexual assault suggests that some teenagers may have the capacity to consent at an earlier age than others, everyone loses their minds.

Milo is a victim and also a supporter of pedantry. Nasty also and I am no fan of him, but the difference between his coverage and Podesta et al is obvious.

This is a good article to point out the hypocrisy: http://www.inquisitr.com/3998554/milo-yiannopoulos-pedophilia-tape-watch-these-celebs-praise-a-proven-pedophile/

Not hypocrisy, blatant propaganda.

I don't keep a log of screennames and who said what, so if someone argues with me about something I say about the hypocrisy of this forum, I'm going to address you assuming you are someone defending or denying that hypocrisy.

No, a 45 year old would not ever be described as a "boy" by someone who is 60 or what the fuck ever your desperate Milo defending would have us believe.

Bottom line, it's completely hilarious how utterly lacking in any self-awareness you dopes have to be to think the media going after Milo for his comments is hypocritical, given your defense of Milo versus your absurd witch hunts of anyone who made the mistake of using spiral clip-art on their menu.

He's saying a sexual relationship between a 13 year old and an adult can be not only okay but wonderful. So you think the 13 year olds are the ones seducing the 40 year olds? That's some typical pedo logic you have there. The child wanted it!

That could imply a relationship between a 35 and 20 year old. A 60 and 45 year old.

Really, you think a 45 year old can be described as a "boy"? If you stretch any farther you might reach the moon.

You are just trying to push the point you WANT, jumping to conclusions that suit whatever agenda you seem to have.

Oh, you mean like "pizza" = "little girl"? Or "handkerchief with pizza-related map" = "infant rape memento"?

It's no hypocrisy, for fuck sake, it's far, far worse.

I would link you to the Joe Rogan Experience full interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnH67G7vAu4

“The law is probably about right [age of consent = 16], that’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age , I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relationships with older men…This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. (People speak over each other). This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most -”

It sounds like Catholic priest molestation to me, another man says, interrupting Milo.

Milo: “And you know what, I’m grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn’t give nearly such good head if it wasn’t for him.”

Milo: “Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys they can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.”

And CNN was recently describing fake news as intentionally putting out a story that is known to be false, yet they described pizzagate as "fake news" without ANY evidence that the story lacks merit, without conducting any investigation, and falsely claiming that the story had been investigated by the police, when this claim is easily proven to be a lie: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yFYWUornulk

I hate a lot of you fucks on here, but the point being made with this post by OP is something I agree with, and why I find validity in a lot of what PGate has uncovered so far.

Look at the difference in the reaction between the two accused...Milo immediately releases a statement saying that he is absolutely against pedophilia. Reminds everyone of the numerous occasions he helped to bring pedophiles to justice, and provided evidence where he has spoken out against out in the past. Then there's Podesta...

Well let's see, Milo said 13 year olds can absolutely consent to sex with their adult teachers/priests/etc and these can be some of the most wonderful, important relationships.

John Podesta bought someone some cheese for Christmas and is one of many fans of a world-famous performance artist.

You want hypocritical, look at this forum bending over backward to defend Milo, who said completely seriously that it's A-OK for adults to seduce 13 year olds, while making 900 negative threads about Amanda Kleinman because she JOKED that "we all have our preferences".

Hell, even Alefantis who gots pictures that are many times worse than what Milo was cut out to say.

Also point out the blatant hypocrisy of the left's love for admitted molester Lena Dunham, yet they thinkMilo is horrible?!

Too true.

15 minute SHILL paid by soros. FUCK YOU POS

Here's a meme to spread: https://i.imgtc.com/HluQdwI.png

The snake still lives we must kill it by cutting off its head. HRC must be proceuted!

While true, Milo had it coming. Can't be Conservative and support Pedophilia

so true.^