RockStrong

And she brags about her greatest accomplishment. She is definitely earning the title of greatest human traffikker of all time. Or should I say child traffikker?

bucketoftea

Very disturbing.

RockStrong

Well explained. This topic should be common and in your face until something is done. Observations: 1) Not sure what the question is as asked in the headline. It is answered in the first paragraph. 2) Why do I keep seeing the ASFA as 'what Bill Clinton signed' when it is Hillary Clinton who defines this as her proudest accomplishment? She may not have signed but she certainly made sure this evil document served her purposes. She's a sick &%*@#!

Eastwood350

Adopting from foster care costs virtually nothing because the minimal fees are normally reimbursed to the adopters. It's very lucrative for the states to remove children unjustly from their homes because they are the "commodities" needed to acquire federal funding for the children. The funds are a subsidy where both the state and the Fed funds cover the cost of foster care. The subsidies range from 50%-80% of the expenses incurred. ie family services are only 50% reimbursement whereas placing a child in a group home would return 80%. States have caught on to this and have hired companies such as Maximus which is a consulting firm to get "more bang for their buck". So many states are now eliminating the services that gave them a smaller reimbursement and putting more efforts into where they get a higher return. AZ is one such state. Also Lockheed Martin is now getting into the same business as Maximus offering states the same consulting services.

The funding from the FED is mainly from the FED IV-E funding (your social security) and the avg. per child is 85k per yr to cover all costs which includes judges, court appointed attorneys, social workers, case workers, visitation transporters, therapists, foster family, etc. etc etc. And that's just the beginning, the states also get bonuses for each and every child they adopt to the tune of 5k-10k per child (depending on their age) IF and only IF the state adopts exceeds the total adoptions from the previous year.

It helps keep citizens in the state gainfully employed but the kicker is they need children to keep their circus going. This is why so many children are wrongfully removed from their homes. And they target lower income families who don't have the means to hire an atty that can cost from 30k-150k.

There are plenty of FB groups filled with parents who've lost their kids unjustly and it comes as no surprise that they are prime targets for pedos to foster and or adopt and get paid for it. Adopters are given a maintenance subsidy check monthly until that child is 18.

https://www.facebook.com/AmericasTaken/photos/a.976274852463009.1073741826.976132759143885/976274839129677/?type=1&theater

salinaslayer

the USA has a lot more poverty than most developed countries, and far more rigorous parenting standards

hypercat

Because you get money from the government when you have a special needs kid. Foster parents can get over $900 a month, special healthcare, food stamps, etc. per kid.

cheetoboat

This goes hand-in-hand with agencies like CPS: There are CPS whistleblowers on youtube. Listen to them. Carlos Morales is one. But there are others who describe, yes, the state can just take your kids away and adopt them out. Its a money-making business where the courts are fake, the legal representation (if provided by the public defender) is fake, you are never charged with a crime because that would mean going to court with a jury of your peers instead of crooked closed fake-courts, children are sometimes "LOST" (go physically missing) in the system but still get counted so they can get PAID, a molested child is often purposely left with molesters because these kids can be "un-adoptable or hard to place", children may already come into the system special needs but we know how kids get diagnosed for everything under the sun & are given cocktails of meds once in the system so as a result they then are considered "special needs", and so much more which is just sick to listen to. These vids are often long and take time to listen to, but its worth it to learn about how sick it is. Parents need to be protesting in the streets over this shit, not fuvking fake feminism with pussy hats!

Clinker

It isn't a difficult question to answer, there are huge financial incentives for states to aggressively confiscate kids and huge incentives for people to adopt, put in place by Clinton: http://massnews.com/past_issues/2000/5_May/mayds4.htm

Mbailey63

They are giving kids to Homosexuals so they will raise homosexuals.

40yearsoftrees

Big Money! in human trafficking.

sleepingbeautycan

Okay, there is another piece of the puzzle. There is huge income disparity in the states. I imagine that there are more adoptions in the lower income brackets and because of the disparity there are more people in the states in relative poverty. If they are being paid (with living support and rent etc) this may be a way to help support themselves.

Hug-a-Root

My son was adopted as an infant, through a private attorney, not an agency. Two years prior to that we were matched with a local birth mother. We spent a ton of $, maternity clothes, lamaz classes, paid her rent, etc. 72 hours after she gave birth she changed her mind and it was a done deal. Some families cannot have children and not all agencies are horrible. The agency we went through supported the birth mother 100%. We were devastated of course but learned soon after that about 35% of birth mother's change their mind at the last minute.

anolegion

Domestically ten times more PER CAPITA .

We're talking 110.000 American children a year . UK, Germany, Australia, The Netherlands and Belgium have less than 10.000 domestic adoptions COMBINED.

OKythen

'cause they are too fat to fuck?

GeorgeT

110 000 / year, holly ghost!!! That is an industry. Pedophile industry must be good too. How many of those parents are pedo parents.

Pizzagatebelieveit

Ok, but what does this have to do with pedogate?

/s

Touchdown50

Everything. How do the elites get their supply of children ? And not get the law snooping around their foul stench?

iamcrd

I've infiltrated several pedo communities and they are very interested in adopting a child in their AoA.

Infopractical

This may be true, but...post that evidence. Let us see and make up our minds as to the veracity of the claims.

There are clearly a host of ugly issues surrounding this topic, but let's be succinct in our summary of what exactly we're facing.

iamcrd

Right now I have a few active rings on Youtube. They need to be stopped immediately at any costs.

Soliciting young girls and families into providing videos under the guise of him being a "talent" agent for a modeling agency. He is a fake outside of the USA pretending to be an American working for a Talent agency.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBV40aVl-ouC5fvda7mjbwA

Christian Girl Lover was talking about adoptions as a possible means of getting children. I talked to him extensively he is a sick Mofo teaching english in Thailand and abusing children. He is a CP producer and distributer. He needs to be taken down A.S.A.P he is very impulsive and dangerous. Click on the "channel" icon and his friends are even posting CP as their avatars on youtube!!! He is suspected of having something to do with Young's Talent Agency fake (not to be confused with the real agency in Arizona). https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClOgdxPNEGYQ2DHWVHmf7NA

iamcrd

Sunny's Family Life - A Lithuanian girl and her family is one target of YoungsTalentAgency. I heard chatter of them trying to groom and mother and father. They are attempting to BUY the little girl. Yes BUY!!!! I do not know if they will be successful or not but i do NOT want to find out.

iamcrd

I kept this information between me and a few investigators until the situation become very urgent. This ring needs to be at the very least spooked and run off Youtube before they contact more children.

Fostasmacker

What we noticed was that for LGBT parents the process was very complicated; for that reason we started asking a lot of questions of the agencies. We found out that there were not that many LGBT adoptive parents in Arizona despite the fact that there are over 17,000 children without homes in our state. It seems there is a big population of LGBT people here who choose not to adopt, don’t know how to adopt, or don’t even realize it is possible. In addition, there are other steps that need to be accomplished to get legal recognition, creating unnecessary barriers. We went to four agencies before we found one that would allow us to adopt. Arizona has a law that permits adoption agencies the right to refuse based on politics, religion, or just private reasons. Finally, we found one that would: Arizona Children’s Association

iamcrd

If you approach him on Youtube and talk to him he will try to recruit you. You can verify everything I said. Do it at your own risk because he is more then willing to send you illegal stuff. As for the Museum stuff. No I wont post evidence I don't want to end up dead sorry.

Yuke

A rhetorical question but I'll answer anyway just to concur with you. As you point out in your opening paragraph, the reason is because they monetized it just like everything else, and it became an area of business. Pretty sick really.

Littleredcorvette

I ran across this site last night. I haven't had time to look at it at yet, but it looks promising. http://poundpuplegacy.org/ Exposing the Dark Side of Adoption

Inspired by stories shared by birth parents, adoptive parents, and adult adoptees, PPL explores the dark side of adoption, and the consequences illegal and unethical actions have on future family-life and the well-being of those affected by adoption.

Too many children are placed for the benefit of agencies and based on the demands of prospective adoptive parents.

Too many children are placed in inappropriate homes because the business interests of adoption agencies have higher priority than the safety of children.

PPL documents and archives cases where the child placement system did not work in the best interest of the child and we offer a platform for those who want to express their thoughts and feelings about the dark side of child adoption.

A story on the home page:

Story of abuse unfolds Date: 2016-02-17

Three adopted children were removed from the Jim and Paige Nachtigal home in North Newton— a 14 year old girl, an 11 year old boy and an 11 year old girl. The oldest child was adopted about four years ago, with the 11 year old children adopted three years ago. They are not biological siblings, according to investigators.

By Chad Frey Newton Kansan

Reaction after three children adopted from Peru have been removed from their North Newton Home and their adoptive parents arrested has ranged from rage to disbelief.

The parents, Jim and Paige Nachtigal, were active in business and ministry in the Newton community. Jim Nachtigal serves as the CEO of Kansas Christian Home. Paige Nachtigal is a former employee of the Newton Area Chamber of Commerce. Both were actively fund-raising to go to Peru as missionaries.

That reputation, and the felony charges that appeared Tuesday, led to a prayer walk around the Harvey County Courthouse and Law Enforcement Center Wednesday morning — about 30 minutes prior to a press briefing inside by the Harvey County Sheriff's office.

anolegion

http://poundpuplegacy.org instituted the Demons of Adoption. The nominations/comments are an interesting read. And the opposing Angels in Adoption Awards are an excellent resource because many of them turn out demons.

40yearsoftrees

Interesting logo at Angels in Adoption Awards, hearts, swirls and butterfly wings.

je-sui-pepe

i always hear that there are not enough US babies to adopt... and is there any follow up to who adopts and how the babies are doing?

Criticalthinker615

do you "desire" a child with special needs sir? htf can that be viewed any other way than creepy

Infopractical

I had an employee (a wonderful, honest, caring woman) who adopted a child from another country with cerebral palsy. There are some people out there willing to share their energy in the caretaker role. It's important that we separate the wheat from the chaff and not judge according to our superficial biases (which are surely inflamed by some of the ugly and real stories we see as we investigate).

save_thechildren

They receive more $$ if disabled.

anolegion

Read this on previously linked site:

In 2004 and the surrounding years, if you spent any length of time on adoption list serves, you saw the phrase “healthy female, as young as possible,” over and over. And more often than not, it was also paired with another word: “fast.”

Now I'm not suggesting ambiguity in phrasing, but..

Criticalthinker615

havent even had a chance to read it yet but that logo in the upper right of the asian kid pic sure looks familiar..anyway off to read it now

pakitochocolatero

In 2012 Russia signed ban on U.S. adoptions of Russian children due to the high number of children reported dead: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-usa-adoptions-putin-idUSBRE8BQ06K20121228

Fostasmacker

Moscow City*Out of Bus: Commonwealth Adoptions International (CAI)AZ/CO USA~Out of Business denied. 2010 Building Arizona Families (Smells Fishy) associated with EAC

anolegion

As did South Korea , another previous longtime supplier

Over time, as South Korea’s economy and infrastructure has improved and moved from the category of developing nation into developed nation, intercountry adoption began to be seen as a hold-over from a troubled past

That is why 'third world conditions' need to exist domestically now.