NotTooLate

Why hasn't anyone on VOAT looked into his son? People on twitter are getting banned and immediately asked to remove serious things posted about him. You can still find this info though.

kidavenger

The Honeybee did an interesting video on the person who I think is his son (has the same last name anyway): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb1zJHweIto

NotTooLate

Something about a secret high level security clearance; secret trips to the middle east on wikileaks and direct connection to NCMEC National Center to Missing and Exploited children. Seems EXTREMELY odd that this sub missed this.

slickleg64

It seems to be a sensitive topic, the kind that gets you banned on 4chan and reddit. I think people who know about this and are really investigating it are keeping it under wraps until they have something solid. Because if there is something that can be proven, it would be a smoking gun.

flyingcuttlefish

SUPER GOOD!

Plus it has all about Petraeus resignation .... so he could take the 5th as a private citizen if asked about Benghazi....

SIMONBARROW

Will Podesta be attending Sean Spicer's press briefings?

GeorgeT

I saw the video and it all clicked! Podesta gets thr 5th ammendment and he can invoke FOIA request and see what the other side has.

2impendingdoom

can he get special access to places with press credentials?

HarveyKlinger

Well, them and the Pope. That one still baffles me.

roninboy00

as an RC myself, i will tell you this: you MUST READ EVERYTHING the pope says in his interviews because most of them are being Translated from another language. the context of what the pontifex is saying is absolutely crucial to What he is saying.

that being said, i am a traditionalist in my religion on many points, but what the pope is doing is VERY dangerous spiritually and economically for this world. at some point the church must reinstate polygamy as accepted, because at this point we are outnumbered 25-1 by the Muslims and Islam.

i highly recommend anyone looking at the spiritual side of this equation equally to the physical check out "father Malachi Martin" as well as "the Letters of Fatima" or "the three secrets of Fatima". at one point in time, there was a psychic who was given the visions of the letters and she traveled to the Vatican to substantiate her visions. not only was she right, but she shook every single religious naysayer against the Vatican to their core. when questioned about the letters by news and media across the world she stated this:

"i will not reveal that which is God's Voice to all. it is not my place to warn the world of coming struggles because the world is not ready for what will come. even then, they probably will hide their heads in the sand. however...i will tell you something of comfort. you will NEVER see the fall of the True Catholic Church. there will be a time of Great Turmoil, and Satan's voice will speak against us, but we will never fall."

HarveyKlinger

I'm RC myself, a convert when I was in high school. I also do a LOT of work for the Catholic church, mainly pro bono so I read a lot of the Pope's stuff from the perspective of an employee, not a regular church goer. I've studied Canon Law for years and I have to know the ins and outs of the Catechism. I'd call myself an ultra-traditionalist. That being said, I really liked Pope Francis when he first arrived because of the good works he was doing. But now, I look at him like any other liberal politician. I do know for a fact that there are a LOT of people in the Vatican who don't like him for similar reasons. IMHO, he needs to change or GTFO.

roninboy00

Amen to that brother. i absolutely think he is in the Pocket of Soros and the NWO. i've had visions for years about Baphomet on the Chair of Saint Peter. my priest told me i was insane, but how else can you explain what's happening at the vatican?

LostandFound

Catch the pope story from a non AP source its another one of these things taken out of context with some copy pasta sentences.

HarveyKlinger

I've read a few different articles but I don't recall if the source was AP or not, I'm sure they were. I'll see if I can find something official from .va

LostandFound

A thing that can do great damage to the information media is disinformation: that is, faced with any situation, saying only a part of the truth, and not the rest. This is disinformation. Because you, to the listener or the observer, give only half the truth, and therefore it is not possible to make a serious judgement. Disinformation is probably the greatest damage that the media can do, as opinion is guided in one direction, neglecting the other part of the truth. And then, I believe that the media should be very clear, very transparent, and not fall prey – without offence, please – to the sickness of coprophilia, which is always wanting to communicate scandal, to communicate ugly things, even though they may be true. And since people have a tendency towards the sickness of coprophagia, it can do great harm.

  • This does not mean what the AP sources ran with. The original AP article had an extremely charged title directed at what was perceived alt media. Pope just said if you publish disinfo & lies you literally peddle in shit.

http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2016/12/07/161207a.html

Freecaris

I'm so glad someone else caught this.

Phenomenonanon

What a snake

cantsleepawink

Well, let's duh join some dots. The Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, of Amazon infamy.

Jeff Bezos is an investment buddy with Ashton Kutcher, of THORN infamy.

They are in the software development game for 'helping' the police with tracking systems.

I wonder why Bezos doesn't like pizzagate ?

zagreos

So:

  • Jeff Bezos (connected with CIA) owns the Washington Post; John Podesta (sex-traficker) has just joined the Washington Post.

  • Jeff Bezos is an investment buddy of Ashton Kutcher; Ashton Kutcher is now suddenly being presented to the public as a 'leading' figure in fight against child sex trafficking — at exactly the same time that sex-traficking pedophile Podesta joins Washington Post and starts reentering the public spotlight.

Intuition says the above two items are somehow closely related.

We'll have to look further into Jeff Bezos and Ashton Kutcher.

Maybe they want to position Ashton Kutcher as some kind of leader in the fight against child sex traficking — so that people will believe him when he claims Pedogate is fake and John Podesta is a victim of defamation? But first Kutcher must establish credibility; he must first demonstrate to the public that he just really cares about the children. What better person to play such a rôle than an actor?

cantsleepawink

There's a reason Kutcher has been cast in movie roles as Steve Jobs. His techie image has been carefully constructed, imo. Here's a post I recently did on THORN https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1672683 .

This new subverse (started a couple of days ago) is dedicated to looking at these technological platforms https://voat.co/v/pizzagateTNT/

remedy4reality

Kutcher's Congressional testimony exposed him as a fraud but this point you're making about him being sheep dipped to make him more trustworthy to Millennials is incredible insight. Good job.

cantsleepawink

Well, here's another thought, on Christmas Day 2015, this article was published all across the internet on Kutcher coming out of a Hollywood Massage parlour: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3373381/Ashton-Kutcher-pictured-leaving-Hollywood-massage-parlour-solo-visit.html

Here's the website: "../losangeles.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/ancient-massage-free-table-shower-grand-opening-818-760-2288/50587668"

Seems that the 'Ancient Therapy message parlour' is also known as the 'Green House Center Spa' brothel "https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-TW&u=http://www.esearch411.com/m/custlist.asp%3Fcatid%3D286%26k%3D&prev=search"

Looking at the website, one hopes that everyone there is legal.

HarveyKlinger

good post...

Empire_of_the_mind

Seems obvious that WaPo is neck deep in all of this shit and Podesta getting on board is just wagon circling.

remedy4reality

The WAPO is the official rag of the CIA and I LOVE the fact they have jumped on Podesta's sinking ship. It reveals their desperation BIGLY.

HashTagFU

Well them and the NYT. A couple of other big papers and smaller ones and all magazines and television news programs and movies and, oh hell, the CIA is the media.

HarveyKlinger

I'm curious on that one. He can file a FOIA request right now. So can you and I. He doesn't need the Washington Post to do it. I don't even think they'd get it any faster. I think the only benefit to WaPo doing the FOIA request is they can report on it since they did the FOIA and it was given to them directly as a result of the FOIA request where I'm not sure the legalities surrounding the results of a FOIA request being given to someone that didn't file the request. I think it depends on the information as well as what has and hasn't been redacted.

Interesting theory nonetheless. I'm going to do some digging on this one.

Infopractical

Maybe the FOIA has a greater chance of being granted. However, whatever gets reported meets the requirements for posting on Wikipedia, which seems to me has become one of the great bias-confirmers in politics.

remedy4reality

It will be the WAPO filing the FOIA's and not Podesta.

This is a significant distinction.

hamans_revenge

He would have a much higher chance of his FOIA's being granted.

Anyone can file an FOIA, but usually they get denied and put on a list somewhere.

HarveyKlinger

Very possible. The one thing about John Podesta though is he may actually be more connected than WaPo. Between he and the Clintons, I wouldn't be surprised if they have more money and better lawyers. Regardless, if it's something they don't want out there, they can redact the entire document as well as wait the max amount of days before honoring it. In fact, I believe Obama claimed Executive Privilege and simply denied some requests so there's always that option (if that's even legal).

Who knows what the angle of JP joining WaPo is... when it comes to politics and lawyers all logic and laws are thrown out the window.

hamans_revenge

WaPo has CIA ties, Podesta probably trafficks kids for the CIA, it's just a department transfer. You would think a cooling off period would mean less visibility rather than more, but the establishment cucks are all about doubling down in 2017.

HarveyKlinger

You're 100% correct on their doubling down. That Hillary loss requires never ending revenge and they are going to throw everything they can at it. Trump has no friends in the media and you know damn well that they are going to report and beat into the ground any/every single thing they can find to dirty him up. They think this is war and they refuse to surrender.