What an absolute tool that man is. " Oh, there's just so many pedophiles now that we're just going to have to ignore some of them! I can't cope!! I just can't!! ". Prick. By the way, here's the version from the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39112911

This man was the last word on BBC's Crimewatch 'Catch The Abusers' special which aired last night and spoke of how hard the police were working and how their approach to abuse reports had changed drastically since 2011....is this a sign of those changes? So now it's so ubiquitous we need to start ignoring the 'lower level offenders'?? Knicker stealers and flashers go on to commit much more serious sex offences and it's documented that pornography is both addictive and additive (you need more and more to satisfy) yet this doesn't apply to those who only 'view' child pornography? This man needs to be demoted and dismissed. Hope it's never one of yours Chief Constable

My guess is that this guy's a pedo.

https://archive.is/sz6XT | https://vgy.me/yEuYRZ.png :

Paedophiles shouldn't face jail for viewing child porn | Daily Mail Online

'Peter Saunders, of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, said the move could be ‘extremely unhelpful to child protection’. '

'Officers should instead focus on the most dangerous offenders who have access to youngsters or are directing abuse online, said chief constable Simon Bailey. '

'Paedophiles should not face jail for looking at pornographic images of children unless they are a physical threat to youngsters, says Britain’s most senior child protection officer. '

'But the NSPCC said the huge rise in offences made it impossible to ‘arrest our way out of the situation’. '

'But he said that an individual who is not in contact with children and is looking at ‘low-level images’ should be treated differently. '

This has been an automated message.