Throgmorton

Sounds like a hit piece on Morgan. He has recently made a whole bunch of liberal apologists look like total dicks.

This is their normal tactic - smear.

If you read the article, he seems to have had a 5 second encounter with Saville concerning television shows. And his comments were made before anyone knew about Saville's "lifestyle". That only came out after Saville died.

Beware the enemy, they are in our house.

Weightstone

interesting since a couple weeks back he was slamming Ewan McGregor because he is friends with that director paedo who fled USA. hello pot, this is kettle.

keepthefaith

"that director" ? It makes you sound ignorant.

His name is Roman Polanski.

madhatter67

Just to point out....that quote is from 2009, before the Savile stuff was public (though I've no doubt Piers would have known all about it as a tabloid gossip columnist)

My jury is still out on whether he is on our side or not

numbat

i grew up knowing he was a pedo because of comedy piers must have known

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeB9ZxffQAE

madhatter67

Yeh ...Of course he did...Hell my mum was calling him a pervert in the 70s

huhWHAThuh

Never liked the guy. Never trusted the guy. Now i know why

ArthurEdens

I'm so confused by this guy, I turned around on him when he defended Trump, then he goes and says this, forget it

strix-varia

He is there to cause confusion. It is all about causing confusion and then....chaos. The guy is US editor at large of Mail Online, who throws out tidbits to the masses. He is a reporter, British (no offence), and one who likes to stir up trouble. No trust. uh-uh...nope.

numbat

He only supported Trump because he thought Trump would lose and then set up his own news channel to rival Fox

ArthurEdens

Right but on bill maher the other week he defended him again, wtf

alliecapone

Seems he genuinely (or not, ya just NEVER know) is defending Trump, they became friends when he was on his show.

I think maybe his opinion takes him wherever he can get the most controversy, and haven't trusted him even whist agreeing. Actually that's what I found ODD AF, that I even was agreeing with him where I hadn't before at all. I'm open minded, if one has a good argument, I concede to it. I never could before because he's smug. But if you only read his articles, and don't see him it works out for him, I see others shocked they agree with him too. Once you SEE him you KNOW he's shiesty and something's amiss.

He's on target about Trump though, I feel like what we see is what we get with him, and that is that. I think it's a nice change. So, I do appreciate that he defends him. Savile tho...naw I can't get behind that...people knew. Ultimately the pedos will be protected even over Trump. Glad he kept his own security detail in addition to feds. I'm positive he's got plans worked out, I hope he's got some killer moves.

chelseaclinton

This violates rule 3 and I'm afraid might distract from far more urgent issues like https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1690808

nomorepepperoni

Don't see a Rule 3 problem here, unless the problem is that the source isn't too well sourced.

chelseaclinton

You might be right.

numbat

The Daily mail is notoriously pro pedo. Is its US editor as welll?

madhatter67

I'm not sure I'd say pro pedo....they do publish some dubious stuff, but also one of the only press outlets that will touch the subject

I have always pretty much despised the Mail, but so much has been flipped on it's head lately who knows who the good guys are anymore?

numbat

if the mail are the good guys it's time to move

keepthefaith

Remember the national enquirer were the 'good guys' when they outed John Edwards as a complete shit.