( pizzagate )

submitted by [deleted]

GeorgeT

How naive are the public? Fool me once ....... fool me 1000 times......shame on the damn planet. Any files should be spammed to the public from anonymous platform. Police are conpartamentalized, top down. Virtually all chiefs of police are part of the cover up!!!!!!!! Stop living in a Disneyland (also pedo town, Walt Disney was a 33deg freemason and a pedophile) Did police go after perpetrarors of Nebraska Boys Town? Make it public, let it go viral.

Xpol

This has been proven a hoax

That page was a page to edit the webpage. The alleged hacker had to break 3different PW and never mentions how or what encryption and also why not show the proof.

The_Roman_Numeral

Bottom line is, fine, the proof would be inadmissible in the court of law due to the hacking, but in the world court of public opinion? the proof would be enough to gather millions to the cause. The absolute pressure that would be put into having a real investigation and it being front news would be enough to blow the lid off this thing and change the future right now.

SayWhatNOWAY

Link?

Antoinette

Titus Frost , i want to see it to know 100% . Should have put hard proof?,

SayWhatNOWAY

Yeah, with all the disinformation out there, we must have 100% proof!

Antoinette

Building the case, this looks unstopable to me.

DarkMath

Don't get too excited. There are a lot of problems with that supposed highly secured file download page.

  1. If it's real and files were taken from it it's technically a theft and therefor inadmissible in court.

  2. There isn't any real proof the file download page exists. I personally think it's real but that doesn't matter in a court of law. It has to be proven it was there. If you go to the wayback machine you only see a login page there. Yes the hacker said they got past the login page to take that infamous screen shot. But how do we know it wasn't one of Putin's employees trying to set up CPP.

Don't get me wrong, I think there's ample evidence that some laws were broken with respect to Pizzagate, I'm just saying we can't assume that file download page was real.

Antoinette

Putin? Ha ha, he gets blamed for everything. Nobody files Any lawsuits , that in it self is some sort pff prove to me. What if hou were skippy podesta, would you not come out and stop this, tell people you would never hurt a child, and explain your wikileaks emails! He has a platform and can stop this, instead people get blocked for nothing! While the pedo sites or isis recruting site are up .

Antoinette

Inadmissible in court , yes , hope it will find a way to the internet! We are here to built a case, everything proven counts!

The_Roman_Numeral

I'm sorry, come again? Putin's employees? you have a responsibility to stick to the facts DarkMath. Do not conjecture. Especially when it comes to touching real people's lives, including innocent children.

DarkMath

" come again? Putin's employees?".......I think the file download page is real. And by all means the FBI needs to investigate CPP like yesterday given the number of bizarre coinkydinks.

I'm just reminding everyone we need unassailable evidence. Yes I'm sounding harsh but that's only to raise the bar with respect to saving the evidence we find.

The problem with that file download page is in the wayback machine it's just a login page. Go see for yourself.

reasonedandinformed

If you logged into the protected area of Comet Ping Pong's site http://web.archive.org/web/20170115055219/https://www.cometpingpong.com/protected/ , and I trust that the hackers got this far, you could see a large list of huge files...must be videos from their size. [Note: They updated their website very recently to remove this protected section.]

There was heavy encryption of these large files. Here is the screenshot that someone took in early November: https://i.redditmedia.com/87fWSaTJAGNE9-n4Gh0oYEGkmDfBcTbzrV4xnl6rg0A.jpg?w=1024&s=7b50d00dec61d5994dfcc654a52d899c

Later, someone claimed to have broken in and sent the files to law enforcement, but that became a predictable dead end. As the computer was a liability, it was predicted that the computer would be damaged in the "attack" by the shooter. The initial stories of "no shots fired" morphed into several shots, one of which hit the computer (of course). The chances of it damaging the hard drive beyond retrieval are small, but luck would have it for JA. The craziest part of the fake shooter was the idea that someone would enter CPP to save the kids and indiscriminately fire off three shots, including into a locked room, not knowing where any children might be. The false flag results all make perfect sense if one of the goals was the removal of some of the strongest evidence that CPP is a transactional site for their evil movement of CP and children.

DarkMath

"you could see a large list of huge files"......That's what I was referring to.

That list could have been added in photoshop or even an HTML editor built into most browsers.

Do you get my point? You're pointing to a screenshot as proof that list of files is real. That "proof" isn't good enough.

Now if you could find those file inside the wayback machine that would be different. Have you tried searching through wayback to find any reference to those files?

ThePuppetShow

The page with the files was there, it changed to a login page after it was found. I saw the file download page with my own eyes.

DarkMath

"saw the file download page with my own eyes".......I believe you. I'm about 99% certain that file download page existed because it's the only rational explanation why Edgar Welch fired his assault rifle into a closet he thought might contain kidnapped children.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8XrE0FSQv4&feature=youtu.be&t=21

DrumpfBTFO

There were some people saying that the protected-area had something to do with the way that those websites are built(can't remember the name right now, Jimboo? or something). So it's not really evidence, unless someone found a way to download those files and view them.

edit: Couldn't be farther off: "Powered by Squarespace"

RedGreenAlliance

Putin's employees? are you serious or being ironic?

You are right we cannot assume anything based on anonymous sources, since we cannot reproduce the same results with our own actions

DarkMath

"Putin's employees"......I'm trying to be totally objective with regard to evidence.

That's one of the good parts about having @AreWeSure involved in this investigation. About 20% of what he says is correct and he'd be all over that screenshot of the file download page.

Remember AreWeSure, I'm trying to be objective. I can change my mind based on evidence. You helped us eliminate "warm traffic" and some other evidence that turned out to be totally innocent.

The problem is YOU'RE not being objective. You won't watch Clinton Cash. You won't watch any of the George Webb videos. You don't think a FINANCIAL AUDIT of the Clinton Foundation is justified despite overwhelming evidence of fraud like hiding all ~1000 donors behind the Clinton Guistra Enterprise Partnerships so no one can "go to ground" and find out who's doing what.

crazimal

Two awoos sitting in a tree,

K I S S I N G,

Dorkmath and Arewesore,

Get a room!

HarveyKlinger

Do you have a link that mentions any of this?

Also, they weren't hosting their website on the computer in the office.

Antoinette

Titus Frost, was a link! Do we have proof of everything, no , thats the point! Will all this lead us to prove in the end? I think so, there is just so much, eventually i do believe we will get there

edblings

they could have been hosting the content from the 'download page' on that computer. private ftp type server perhaps?