Daily Mail On Line (World's most read news website) BIZARRE lead story slaughtering WIKIPEDIA for promoting fake news sources + specifically citing example of Exaro News 'Elite Pedophile Ring' stories ( pizzagate )

submitted by keepthefaith

WHAT is happening here folks - can someone deconstruct this latest bout of insanity?

Daily Mail attacking Wikipedia editors as basement dwelling oddball losers, smearing Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales as a sexual deviant who once ran a porno search engine promoting lesbian porn, and pretty much calling anyone who uses Wikipedia as a source, a "Nazi" ...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4280502/Anonymous-Wikipedia-activists-promote-warped-agenda.html

Notice how they specifically made Exaro News ' elite pedophile ring ' stories the THESIS STATEMENT of this article and then concluded with a bizarro paranoid rant about wicked Wikibots?

They've lost their f-ing minds. The desperado 'pizzagate distractions' continue...

GladToBeHere

And They just published an article that claims Jon Benet Ramsey might have been killed by a pedophile ring in Colorado

keepthefaith

see my new Voat thread. Great minds..... x

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1816516

3141592653

Wikipedia is pro-pedo compromised. There is no page for Lawrence King of the Franklin Scandal. The page on ritual abuse is continually edited by TPTB to make it to make it sound like a mass hysteria hoax. I don't think there's a page for johnny Gosch. I could go on and on

MostPostersAreShills

Shill post.

roundhouse1776

It's common knowledge among red-pilled individuals that Wikipedia is the globalists' version of history. You'll never find anything on Wikipedia that TPTB don't want you to know. Also, Wikipedia recently no longer accepts Daily Mail as a reputable source, so this looks like payback. Apparently Wikipedia has never heard the saying, "you shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house".

zzvoat

It's really quite unsurprising. The mid section of this sentence says it all: "And yet, it has declared that the Daily Mail — one of the most popular mainstream newspapers published in any Western democracy — is somehow too ‘unreliable’ to be included on its site."

sponiatowski

I like Wikipedia and use it often...or I did. Hopefully there isn't too much of a change coming.

Mellowmountain

I wish aaron schwartz were still alive. I feel like he would be leading the fight against online censorship right now

keepthefaith

I know; he would :(

bumbleberries

They have a pretty strong case against Wikipedia being a complete failure. I hope this wakes people up, but the comments are discomforting.

cantsleepawink

Everyone knows that you need to go to other sources for verification. But it is a very useful source for initial leads for researchers. Look at the comments on the article, the public is aware of the Daily Mail's agenda. Their first picture of an article on Trump's inauguration should tell you everything that you need to know.

crazimal

Wikipedia has long been famously bogus as a source of anything factual about anything with a political side.

And daily mail is a tabloid, so there you have it.

Why a pedo ring as example? Just because it gets attention perhaps, scandal flavor of the day so to speak

keepthefaith

hmmm. Too coincidental.

keepthefaith

LOL. Name me a website that IS "wholly true" or reliable. BBC NEWS? Oh, sure..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677i43QfYpQ

numbat

Wikipedia won't accept the Daily Fail as a source any more because it's a piece of shit tabloid rag. So they have thrown there toys out of the pram.

keepthefaith

Daily Mail can be good or evil, depending. They have been a great promoter of leftist b.s recently, so this latest rant is odd timing.

numbat

is that the American left? They don't publish anything left wing in in the UK

keepthefaith

Weird they went after Melania, as D Trump and Piers Morgan (U.S Editor) are so close: http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/09/02/daily-mail-retracts-melania-trump-escort-story-after-she-files-suit/

I know they're the Daily Heil in UK.

numbat

The Mail writing lies about Eastern European immigrants isn't a shock. They just write click bait half the time and it seems to be working for them as a business model unfortunately the truth suffers. I only view mirror links for the Mail and the Murdoch rags

Phenomenonanon

Looks like they are just mad that Wikipedia editors have put dailymail on a list for not being a reputable news source

keepthefaith

Why specifically mention the Exaro News 'elite pedophile ring' stories as an example. Plenty others to choose from....

Clinker

I don't think the author was making a point in order to help discredit pizza-related theories. I think he just hasn't been red-pilled yet. Obviously he is just mostly upset that the Daily Mail got banned. He's right about WIkipedia - it is useless for anything that has a political angle.