Oprah website shows the FBI pedo symbols!! Also great article on spotting pedos.

Ushil 2017-03-08T10:13:37

Oprah is a racist who wants all white people to be dead, she is no better than a white supremacist wanting all black people dead. It doesn't surprise me at all that apart from a racist, she is a pedophile too.

link

bopper 2017-03-05T17:05:17

She's been to Sedona Arizona.

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-05T14:24:21

That is nice to see about Oprah. Looks like she is a celebrity on the right side of this issue.

link

equineluvr 2017-03-05T14:00:18

Okra is a New Age occultist billionairess who holds "secret" meetings with Turner, Gates et al to discuss the Depopulation Agenda and how they will meet their goals.

http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2009/05/26/billionaires-try-to-shrink-worlds-population-report-says/

I think you either naive about her or this is wishful thinking on your part.

link

strix-varia 2017-03-06T02:39:15

So, tell me, where is she now??? Hobnobbing with good friend jeff besos and still sucking millions of naive women into the church of snoprah. Oh and still trying to lose weight by buying the company.

link

equineluvr 2017-03-05T13:32:11

Don't EVER forget that Orcah -- er, I mean Oprah -- started that school for girls in Africa where the students were sexually abused!

This article ALSO reminds us that Okra -- er, I mean Oprah -- was sexually abused herself. So, given her career choice and the lofty position with it she holds, she is likely a perp IMO.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/troubles-oprah-winfreys-school-south-africa/story?id=12950275

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-05T14:26:21

Be fair. I want to nail these sickos as much as anyone. Unless there is specific evidence, please don't libel her. I have never been a fan, but the piece was informative and would seem to contradict her as one of the sick pedos. Suspicion of elites and celebrities is good, but please don't accuse someone without strong evidence.

link

equineluvr 2017-03-05T14:41:15

I said "likely" and "IMO." Ergo, I did not libel anyone.

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-05T14:45:44

Sorry if I came across as harsh. I just think we need to be carefully labeling some high-profile people without strong support for a couple of reasons. 1. Those who oppose us will use it against us. 2. We could alienate potential allies, which are hard to find among the elite. You MAY be right about Oprah, but her piece on the topic gives me hope that she opposes this pedo sickness and might ultimately help. My theory on those in the media is that many who might want to support this are compromised in some way, not necessarily by being pedos themselves. In other cases, they may lack the authority to be public or may be threatened into silence. That is the context. We are on the same team and just should be cautious in pointing fingers at top people for these reasons.

link

equineluvr 2017-03-05T15:14:57

I'm sure that someone who holds secret meetings about DEPOPULATION (read: MASS GENOCIDE) is on the "right side" and has just been "threatened into silence."

I think you need a new moniker because you are neither reasoned nor informed.

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-05T17:01:13

Look, I do not know whether that is true. I saw it written but have not seen the evidence. The article mentions who was at a meeting, and many have theorized this specifically about Gates, but I am not one to do the guilt by association thing. If the evidence leads there, let's see it. That is my whole point. I do not support people making claims without the support...that simple.

link

Aaronkin 2017-03-05T13:05:41

This women thinks she has what it takes to be our leader. After all the people who have been found with ties to child exploitation who hold positions in agencies for protecting children! With all the resources she has for research, she still spent years supporting the Clintons and Obama. In spite of all the glaring evidence that has been in plain sight. We are supposed to believe she is on our side with no explanation for her past alliances! I don't object to accepting help from a source that is contrary to my positions or beliefs but this womens efforts do not pass even the simplest smell test. Just another fox who wants to guard the hen house.

link

redditsuckz 2017-03-05T18:53:40

Oprah loves life and children so much she donates to Planned Parenthood who was found to be selling baby body parts.

Meeting of World’s Richest Names Pro-Abortion Population Control as Main Cause

http://www.lifenews.com/2009/05/25/int-1206/

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-05T22:01:39

A separate reason why I do oppose Oprah. I just think we should not label someone a pedo or pedo supporter too easily as that is a major label, and I have not seen the evidence on her. If the evidence comes out that she is part of this evil network or quietly supports, I view her on the same level of those who commit these evils.

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-05T14:29:04

There are plenty whom I supported despite what now appear to be glaring facts that expose them. It is easy for people who hold someone in esteem to simply ignore some of the evidence that might burst the bubble. We should reserve any judgment on Oprah based on her associations. I am wondering if someone has an in to connect with her on this to see if she will put out a story since she did in 2005. That would be telling in terms of where she is on this issue.

link

Aaronkin 2017-03-05T21:38:08

Hey Thanks for being my first down vote. I feel honored I earned it fighting against a oppressive, feel good manipulative Hollywood phony. Get your rose colored glasses off, even former Rep.Cynthia McKinney (D) has the brains to call for Clinton's arrest and imprisonment. But not a word out of Oprah that I have heard. While your solution is to have her make a statement on the evil of child exploitation and not to address the issue of her friends who Oprah herself shielded from all criticism on her program while they were in power and involved in that same crime. It appears to me if you are sincere that you are about to support another one of those who you so often have found to betray you. If my understanding of this is right, I am happy to disagree with you.

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-05T21:58:39

I do not support Oprah and am generally very anti-Hollywood. I just believe that she, as all people, should not be labeled a pedo supporter without evidence. I have not yet seen the evidence for the claim. We can agree to disagree as it is clear that we both want to nail these sickos and supporters, whoever they are. Maybe Oprah is on their team, but I am not yet convinced.

BTW, I did not downvoat you. I will only do that for a known shill of for someone who pushes way too hard on something without any support.

link

Aaronkin 2017-03-05T22:27:49

I am new at this, sorry your right about the down vote. I see my mistake.

link

reasonedandinformed 2017-03-06T00:26:45

No problem. We are in this together brother, and I am as eager to take down anyone as I am sure you are. I just know the fight we have against corporate media, elites, and censorship is major, so we need to be cautious in specifically labeling someone unless we have strong evidence. Don't get me wrong...I am not a fan of Oprah and think she has some major morality issues, such as her support of Planned Parenthood, which was created with a stated goal of eradicating blacks (eugenics views of founder).

link

Pokes 2017-03-05T13:52:08

This might be her way of getting her large viewership to investigate pizzagate. And it's not entirely beyond the realm of possibility that Oprah supported who she has for innocuous reasons; Bill Clinton was relatively popular with black voters, Hillary is woman, Obama was black and all three were democrats. While I don't find it plausible, it might nevertheless be possible that this has flown under her radar until now and that she fears outing anyone without a smoking gun would just lead to the deep state targeting her. Perhaps this is as good as we can expect from a celebrity of her stature?

I read the thing and wasn't impressed with the depth of it but was still happy she's giving the subject attention; this might be the extent to which she feels she can act naive as to what's truly going on and hope not to arouse anyone worrisome's ire. Also, including the established pedo symbols and perhaps just the coverage of that fundamental feature of this subculture will expose many perverts and sketchy institutions hiding in plain sight to people previously unaware. So, yeah she isn't red-pilling people, but she might be paving the road towards that end, and making an ally of millions of mothers can not be a bad thing!