SYNCORSWIM

Remember the Wonderland CP FBI bust? Most of the people involved we're trading images and video of their own children.

Mannix

Whoever wrote that Wikileaks posting is confused. There was no photography at the end of the 18th century. The 18th century was the 1700s, not the 1800s.

Dorfaladin

Everyone, please read the talk page of this thread. To me, it is just as disturbing as the actual article itself. These are posters on wikileaks and most of them seem to completely agree with this mr. x, though thankfully there are some dissenting voices. Guys... what if these are normal attitudes (even if just say for a large minority) of posters at WL? Would PG and the pedophocracy necessarily be exposed by people like this? Maybe some who have at least some honesty. I dont know guys... This post really disturbed me.

Piscina

I found some of what this man said extremely disturbing. He says we don't have a definition of 'child porn'. That's BS. It's not rocket science: anything that sexualises and objectifies children is on a slippery slope to child porn. Anything that is done to them which they are not capable of consenting to is child porn. Taking little girls into little Lolitas is sexualising them. Then there is the other extreme--the torture, the abuse, the sadism. The fact that this dude can't--or won't--draw the line tells me he's gross.

It's also extremely suspect that he knows in great details the sophisticated methods used by child pornographers to evade and avoid law enforcement.

Ushil

Let's just use what he said and thank this dude for exposing himself and their methods.

Drnoway

Talk about a wall of text!

Mad_As_Hell

Good old CNN doing their part to rehabilitate his image: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1132761

He seems to be making money out of the 'repentant former kiddie porn peddler' angle, gross: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4448050/

kazza64

shocking in its content

rippingtheveil

Yep that's right

zzvoat

This is really odd. Wikileaks was compromised long ago. Any topic that matters, which this one is, is edited and reedited and propagandized until the end of tomorrow. There are people who monitor these subjects and receive key word and tag notifications on special apps they use. I am not saying this is not real. What I'm saying is that, if it is real, how in the heck has it been left up there so long?" Traffickers don't take kindly to those who share trade secrets.

rippingtheveil

Yes it is odd, I would have never of thought about looking for it until pizzagate

ArthurEdens

more victim blaming and putting the halo on the pedo

rippingtheveil

Yep thank God trump got in they world have legalized pedophilia

kestrel9

Legalizing it would just be the beginning...consider the Kinsey files, promoting the idea that babies are sexualized from birth, and that parents should be encouraged to 'stimulate' them with that in mind, and engage in incest as a healthy expression of human sexuality 'with their young children'. Remember Jocelyn Elders? (Because kids, after thousands of years, somehow needed a government sponsored and approved class on masturbation!) Now the Left Reich schools also teach how to put condoms on bananas and Left Reich colleges create emotionally damaged students who don't know their gender from one moment to the next due to hypersensitive naval gazing over their sexuality. Infantile and emotionally regressive, these politically manipulated PsyOp victims now require 'safe rooms' from micro-aggressions. What actually goes on in 'safe rooms' anyway, now that we know colleges cover for professors who have INFANT fing PORN on their computers!! Every parent who is paying big money to send their kids to these colleges need to cut off the funds, former students need to do a little research, and if they are supporting these emotionally damaging brainwashing programs then stop donating! Universities and Colleges need a financial and enrollment wake-up call to get out from under the jack boot of the PedoAgenda!

Remember "Get the Government out of our bedroom!"? What a ruse, the REAL goal long term, was to get the Government right into the BABY's bedroom! So to follow the line of thinking of pedos in power: kids benefit from being used as masturbation toys for adults with so called "sexual preferences". So if (in their minds) babies are sexual, can a pedo claim he has a 'relationship' with a baby or young child that has to be recognized by law? After all, continuing down this rabbit hole of pedo logic, not only do non-pedo parents just get in the way of 'natural' sexual expression by NOT molesting their kids, they might cause harm by preventing their kids from getting it with a willing pedo. Will the Federal government in this end game scenario have absolute rights to take children from parents based on that? We see already how CPS is able to take children and place in homes with pedos.

rippingtheveil

Also involved in sundance films,

Rmm

Strange sentiments to say the least

Commoner

It seems like someone had mentioned that we should pay attention to "cards". Credit cards were discussed here:

" Today's schemes are technologically very demanding and extremely complex. It starts with the renting of computer servers in several countries. First the Carders are active to obtain the credit cards and client identities wrongfully. These data are then passed to the falsifiers who manufacture wonderful official documents so that they can be used to identify oneself. These identities and credit card infos are then sold as credit card kits to operators. There is still an alternative where no credit card is needed: in the U.S. one can buy so-called Visa or MasterCard gift cards. However, these with a certain amount of money charged Visa or MasterCard cards usually only usable in the U.S.. Since this anonymous gift cards to buy, these are used to over the Internet with fake identities to pay. Using a false identity and well-functioning credit card servers are then rented and domains purchased as an existing, unsuspecting person. Most of the time an ID is required and in that case they will simply send a forged document. There is yet another alternative: a payment system called WebMoney (webmoney.ru) that is in Eastern Europe as widespread as PayPal in Western Europe. Again, accounts are opened with false identities. Then the business is very simple in Eastern Europe: one buys domains and rents servers via WebMoney and uses it to pay'"

Whoever wrote this was sympathetic to pedophiles and justifying the normalization of it:

"The question we should ask is: what kind of a decent life can the society provide for the pedophiles? It is a mistake to believe that pedophiles are monsters".... "If you want to reduce abuse and child pornography, you must start at the right place: major funds must finally be put in the research flow in order to offer for pedophiles a hope for a decent life (among others in the preference structure education [?] whose understanding is essential for any sexual preference). There must be radical work on stigma."

Ushil

Perhaps the illuminati cards? Remember the pizza party card?

Or maybe the Tarot cards from the Economist?

rippingtheveil

Yes I agree, I remember seeing that the fbi runs 33 child porn sites in the darkweb, If so the fbi knows who they are, and today vault 7 from wiki, so they are using the info for blackmail, this is crazy, what an amazing time to be alive, the deep state is in deep shit, drain the swamp

rooting4redpillers

Where and how abuse happens: I have pretty much faced everything what is happening on the Internet regarding this theme. But the gruesome images of crying, raped and even tortured children do not come from commercial producers. They come not from third parties but from bestial fathers and mothers of the children that do this to them. Most are fathers with incestuous tendencies who meet in forums and chats.

That part just sounds wrong to me, and some other things. I'd like to hear other thoughts.

Commoner

I think whoever wrote this had an agenda in mind and that was to normalize pedophilia. Later, the writer says that pedos are not monsters and society must make a place for them because it is a sexual preference.

palmitespo910

For many years I have made a clear distinction between pedos and people who abuse children. I have tended to believe that there has to be pedos out there that don't touch kids or view cp because it's wrong or illegal or whatever. I have been forced, lately, to revisit my thoughts on that particular stance.

rooting4redpillers

Yep. All the technical things he writes about sound, to me, like he knows a lot of useful things about the technology of how this business works, but maybe that's just because I don't understand those things. Maybe one of our people here will comment on some of that. It's other things that made this fall apart for me. Things that contradict what I've heard here, and presented in a strange way, like two or three people working on one article. With bits of emotion, weirdly injected into matter-of-fact tone. Worse, this writer who claims to KNOW so much, hasn't disclosed a thing useful, and even implies that ending CP is a lost cause. I read it all again. Conclusion, this is a steaming pile of bullshit, and Fuck you David Brock, and the rest of you fuckhead pedo enablers.

rippingtheveil

I know it's crazy to think about I feel so bad for the children

Piscina

Yeah, when I read these things, it's the children I think about.

9217

In Belgium - Dutroux? UNICEF? Interesting it was in a Stratfor email.

rippingtheveil

Can u please forward email thxs

rippingtheveil

Yep tons of emails

rippingtheveil

Just typing into search trough wikileaks makes me want to take a shower,

PizzagateBot

Hi! I used Google to find related Voat posts using the URL(s) in your post and created the following link(s):

OriginLinkFromCurrentPost RelatedPostTitle
wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn Purple Pill - We need to be more granular with our definitions and targets.