Why are we making this an either/or issue? Vault #7 is as important in revealing shady tactics to normies. Are these shill techniques to discredit the info?
I posted this twice yesterday but was deleted both times for violating 'Rule 1'.
TL;DR I think WL and Assange could well be controlled opposition.
I have had my suspicions regarding WL for some time now but due to the Vault 7 leaks on Tuesday, my concerns that we're being puppeteered have been reinforced. I along with many others were expecting something more significant and damaging to TPTB but instead what we received was in effect a Snowden 2.0 leak, confirming much of what we already know/suspect. Now I'm not suggesting that this information is irrelevant or not valuable and I know it’s only been a couple of days but it just feels like we're being further desensitised and demoralised into a state of apathy and hopelessness. Also by incorporating the subtitle 'Year Zero' and cryptic image (alter contrast/brightness for reveal) as part of the pre-hype, it begs the question, why is WikiLeaks presenting its work this dramatically as if it were part of an episode of Homeland? Surely the data speaks for itself and requires no superficiality?!
What compounds my anxieties is the fact that since October 2016 and the internet shutdown at the Ecuadorian Embassy, the behaviour of WL and Tweets etc from Assange have been odd. Moreover Julian Assange still hasn't provided a satisfactory 'proof of life' leading many to believe he is either dead or at least no longer resident at the Embassy.
To me the motivation of these leaks appears to be a chance to shift focus from the NSA/GCHQ to the CIA who are currently part of the major political narrative being fomented by the media both mainstream (agenda) and independent (observation). This strikes me as a plausible and shrewd strategy to apportion blame to an agency that has widely been observed acting reprehensibly for decades. My intuition tells me that the CIA is being placed in the crosshairs and from its inevitable dismantlement, a new, more covert, more insidious agency will be born. Thus I feel the Vault 7 leaks are a distraction and a decoy.
I do not buy the schism between the Deep State components that some espouse but interpret this as another parlour trick to redirect attention and throw us off the scent. They have this piece of theatre sewn up and any infighting would be swiftly dealt with before word could get out and plans compromised. Let’s be honest, they have been formulating and advancing this global agenda for a very long time and have become adept in controlling the social reality. There are many questions regarding WikiLeaks that need to be addressed but some of the most pertinent are, what was Cass Sunstein's (WH official 09-12) involvement in the early days of WikiLeaks? Why in the past has the expertise of Alan Dershowitz (staunch Zionist) been sought by WL? These two questions more broadly refer to a conflict of interests that WL has displayed over the years. And finally, why is Julian Assange so reluctant to discuss and is openly irked by the suggestion that 911 was a false flag? This is surely the litmus test as to whether someone is controlled opposition or not. 911 is now basically a closed book to anyone who's looked into it!
As far as the ramifications to pizzagate are concerned if these criticisms are accurate, I think it would change everything. It would be nigh on impossible to trust any official body either mainstream or independent due to the possibility of ‘astroturfing’ that may have occurred but also because of the vulnerability to infiltration that a disparate group of people are exposed to.
These links elaborate on the points I have raised,
He is alive and well, I'm sure. Imagine the number of people that would be involved in covering up his disappearance. The rest of the wikileaks team, his friend Kim Dotcom (
https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/793986913304621058)
), his lawyer, Hannity (Fox interview, jan 2017), Pamela Anderson, John Pilger (RT inteview, october 30th) and so many others that I forget. They would all be involved in covering up his disappearance or death. This doesn't add up.
As Assange himself said recently, he would prefer supporters to campaign for his release, rather than waste their time with proof of life theories. As he states also, Wikileaks is much larger than he, and he is not required for Wikileaks to do what they do. Also in his own words, this would be dangerous. Why not campaign for his release?
I'm no shill dude. There are snipers trained on him 24/7. Would you come out?
He's actually doing a press conference in 15 mins, where he'll talk about the CIA leaks.
Maybe you don't have to waste your time camping out. You'll all be looking like CIA shills yourself, as they're the ones who benefit from the bs you're peddling.
One answer, if done right: mirrors. Assange can wave in front of a mirror visible on the patio. Next best thing. Again, needs to be done right for privacy/sniper countering reasons.
As he's said himself Pepperoni, the black op would
still
say WL is compromised. Also as he said, no proof of life is 100% foolproof, so he would rather not pander to it, it get on with leaking.
You seem to know a lot. Work for the CIA much? Nice try all that shit is caught on camera and he's come out before what makes you think he won't do it again. Lolz nice try bruh gotta get better CIA. Your leaks suck by the why give us some real juice. How bout some bush cartel cabal.
Yea, i am informed. Why not get over to the press conference and ask him yourself, if he'd rather you campaigned for his release, or camped out whining about proof of life?
I don't want him coming outside, that's a quick way to get assassinated. I just want someone to live stream walking up to the embassy and meeting Assange with zero pauses or interruptions... that's it. No questions need to be answered.
Brazen and predictable and live streaming is not how reality works? What?? It's the best way to prove he is alive... won't have to worry about him being shot from a distance, it's LIVE so no one can edit it... are you a shill?
Even if Julian does show himself, there are still those who will say he and Wikileaks are compromised.
He's been on Periscope, talking about current events and reading a transaction from that day's blockchain.
If you follow Wikileaks on Twitter, it's evident that the Equadorian elections worry him, as he may lose immunity.
If you follow his colleagues on twitter, it's evident they are working tirelessly for his release.
If you follow Pamela Anderson, it's evident she's visiting him regularly.
We have to ask who benefits from creating rumours that Wikileaks are compromised and Assange is dead, when it's evident to anyone who looks that he's alive and, the leaks are leaking.
Seems Assange trusts her, the amount she visits him...
Assange is doing a press conference in 15 mins if you're interested. #AskWL over on twitter.
I hope lots of pedogate questions.
Tell Tim Pool(@ Timcast) to visit Julian. He is in London right now and asking people on twitter what he should do in London for his birthday. He is one of the journalists that went to Sweden to see what was really happening.
Exactly, this is a great question to ask. Wikileaks is not compromised and JA is most probably alive and well. This is all a big distraction to create division and doubts among the good guys.
If the deep state take out Julian, it will not be long before his closest friends learn about it and tell the world. You cannot cover up the death of one of the most important person on Earth right now for so long without anyone noticing.
People who believe Assange is missing seem to believe the CIA/NSA/deep state now run the place, and are using leaks as a form of "limited hangout" or distraction from the pedos.
I don't personally believe this theory, but understand why some do. One of them could probably better explain.
I understand there's a major censorship op happening, however on the other hand there are still many hundreds of people tweeting about #pizzagate and #pedogate over on twitter, every minute of every day.
Someone there better have a livestream FFS (or multiple). Nobody who believes in "AssangeIsMissing" is going to buy random text "HE CAME TO THE WINDOW!" or fuzzy ass photos or dated video.
▼ acme2011
Why are we making this an either/or issue? Vault #7 is as important in revealing shady tactics to normies. Are these shill techniques to discredit the info?
▼ privatepizza
Certainly looks like it
▼ privatepizza
Live Wikileaks Press Conference on Periscope starting now
https://www.periscope.tv/w/1ZkKzEqeDMZxv
▼ Amino69
I posted this twice yesterday but was deleted both times for violating 'Rule 1'.
TL;DR I think WL and Assange could well be controlled opposition.
I have had my suspicions regarding WL for some time now but due to the Vault 7 leaks on Tuesday, my concerns that we're being puppeteered have been reinforced. I along with many others were expecting something more significant and damaging to TPTB but instead what we received was in effect a Snowden 2.0 leak, confirming much of what we already know/suspect. Now I'm not suggesting that this information is irrelevant or not valuable and I know it’s only been a couple of days but it just feels like we're being further desensitised and demoralised into a state of apathy and hopelessness. Also by incorporating the subtitle 'Year Zero' and cryptic image (alter contrast/brightness for reveal) as part of the pre-hype, it begs the question, why is WikiLeaks presenting its work this dramatically as if it were part of an episode of Homeland? Surely the data speaks for itself and requires no superficiality?!
What compounds my anxieties is the fact that since October 2016 and the internet shutdown at the Ecuadorian Embassy, the behaviour of WL and Tweets etc from Assange have been odd. Moreover Julian Assange still hasn't provided a satisfactory 'proof of life' leading many to believe he is either dead or at least no longer resident at the Embassy.
To me the motivation of these leaks appears to be a chance to shift focus from the NSA/GCHQ to the CIA who are currently part of the major political narrative being fomented by the media both mainstream (agenda) and independent (observation). This strikes me as a plausible and shrewd strategy to apportion blame to an agency that has widely been observed acting reprehensibly for decades. My intuition tells me that the CIA is being placed in the crosshairs and from its inevitable dismantlement, a new, more covert, more insidious agency will be born. Thus I feel the Vault 7 leaks are a distraction and a decoy.
I do not buy the schism between the Deep State components that some espouse but interpret this as another parlour trick to redirect attention and throw us off the scent. They have this piece of theatre sewn up and any infighting would be swiftly dealt with before word could get out and plans compromised. Let’s be honest, they have been formulating and advancing this global agenda for a very long time and have become adept in controlling the social reality. There are many questions regarding WikiLeaks that need to be addressed but some of the most pertinent are, what was Cass Sunstein's (WH official 09-12) involvement in the early days of WikiLeaks? Why in the past has the expertise of Alan Dershowitz (staunch Zionist) been sought by WL? These two questions more broadly refer to a conflict of interests that WL has displayed over the years. And finally, why is Julian Assange so reluctant to discuss and is openly irked by the suggestion that 911 was a false flag? This is surely the litmus test as to whether someone is controlled opposition or not. 911 is now basically a closed book to anyone who's looked into it!
As far as the ramifications to pizzagate are concerned if these criticisms are accurate, I think it would change everything. It would be nigh on impossible to trust any official body either mainstream or independent due to the possibility of ‘astroturfing’ that may have occurred but also because of the vulnerability to infiltration that a disparate group of people are exposed to.
These links elaborate on the points I have raised,
http://tarpley.net/2013/06/19/how-to-identify-a-cia-limited-hangout-operation/
http://tarpley.net/2011/01/20/wikileaks-cognitive-infiltration-operation/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/07/08/fake-and-faker-assange-and-snowden/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La3AiTmIWwYYouTubeYouTube
http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-how-the-cia-invented-conspiracy-theories/
▼ newworldahead
He is alive and well, I'm sure. Imagine the number of people that would be involved in covering up his disappearance. The rest of the wikileaks team, his friend Kim Dotcom ( https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/793986913304621058) ), his lawyer, Hannity (Fox interview, jan 2017), Pamela Anderson, John Pilger (RT inteview, october 30th) and so many others that I forget. They would all be involved in covering up his disappearance or death. This doesn't add up.
Julian is alive and well.
▼ privatepizza
Over on Periscope for the press conference! Staring right now.
https://www.periscope.tv/w/1ZkKzEqeDMZxv
▼ newworldahead
Thanks for the link!
▼ IDeliverPizza
Kim dot com has a gag order. Hannity works for the Mason's along with Pamela and the RT interviewer. Nice try CIA shill
▼ newworldahead
Haha calm down, are you paranoid? :) I'm only using common sense.
▼ 2impendingdoom
they better get dna proof even if he appears
▼ nomorepepperoni
LOL forgot about that possibility. BODY DOUBLE! Probably programming him in a van right now. :P
▼ pnwpatriot97
It also is a Jewish holiday. One day before my birthday too, heuheuheu.
▼ undertheshills
If it turns out Assange is dead and Hannity is a shill we are so fucked.
▼ privatepizza
As Assange himself said recently, he would prefer supporters to campaign for his release, rather than waste their time with proof of life theories. As he states also, Wikileaks is much larger than he, and he is not required for Wikileaks to do what they do. Also in his own words, this would be dangerous. Why not campaign for his release?
▼ IDeliverPizza
Then he'll have no problem coming outside for five minutes to waive to the fans. Fuvk off CIA shill
▼ privatepizza
I'm no shill dude. There are snipers trained on him 24/7. Would you come out? He's actually doing a press conference in 15 mins, where he'll talk about the CIA leaks. Maybe you don't have to waste your time camping out. You'll all be looking like CIA shills yourself, as they're the ones who benefit from the bs you're peddling.
▼ nomorepepperoni
One answer, if done right: mirrors. Assange can wave in front of a mirror visible on the patio. Next best thing. Again, needs to be done right for privacy/sniper countering reasons.
▼ privatepizza
As he's said himself Pepperoni, the black op would still say WL is compromised. Also as he said, no proof of life is 100% foolproof, so he would rather not pander to it, it get on with leaking.
▼ nomorepepperoni
Which makes sense. Again, I don't believe it, but understand others do.
▼ IDeliverPizza
You seem to know a lot. Work for the CIA much? Nice try all that shit is caught on camera and he's come out before what makes you think he won't do it again. Lolz nice try bruh gotta get better CIA. Your leaks suck by the why give us some real juice. How bout some bush cartel cabal.
▼ privatepizza
Yea, i am informed. Why not get over to the press conference and ask him yourself, if he'd rather you campaigned for his release, or camped out whining about proof of life?
▼ IDeliverPizza
Cuz he's dead you fuck. Fuvk off CIA
▼ Crunch43
I don't want him coming outside, that's a quick way to get assassinated. I just want someone to live stream walking up to the embassy and meeting Assange with zero pauses or interruptions... that's it. No questions need to be answered.
▼ Amino69
IMO this would be far too brazen and predictable, it's just not how reality works.
▼ Crunch43
Brazen and predictable and live streaming is not how reality works? What?? It's the best way to prove he is alive... won't have to worry about him being shot from a distance, it's LIVE so no one can edit it... are you a shill?
▼ Amino69
I was inferring an assassination of Assange on the balcony would be brazen and predictable.
▼ Crunch43
My apologies
▼ Amino69
no worries.
▼ privatepizza
Even if Julian does show himself, there are still those who will say he and Wikileaks are compromised.
He's been on Periscope, talking about current events and reading a transaction from that day's blockchain. If you follow Wikileaks on Twitter, it's evident that the Equadorian elections worry him, as he may lose immunity. If you follow his colleagues on twitter, it's evident they are working tirelessly for his release. If you follow Pamela Anderson, it's evident she's visiting him regularly. We have to ask who benefits from creating rumours that Wikileaks are compromised and Assange is dead, when it's evident to anyone who looks that he's alive and, the leaks are leaking.
▼ Crunch43
Pamela Anderson? She has been spotted at Marina Abramovic spirit cooking dinners with the mock corpse cakes . She can't be trusted
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5djksf/pamela_anderson_spotted_at_a_recent_marina/
▼ privatepizza
Seems Assange trusts her, the amount she visits him... Assange is doing a press conference in 15 mins if you're interested. #AskWL over on twitter. I hope lots of pedogate questions.
▼ Crunch43
Tell Tim Pool(@ Timcast) to visit Julian. He is in London right now and asking people on twitter what he should do in London for his birthday. He is one of the journalists that went to Sweden to see what was really happening.
▼ IDeliverPizza
Somebody spread this to GLP. I think I'm banned
▼ abcdefg222
I'm confused. What about vault 7? Who do you think released?
▼ newworldahead
Exactly, this is a great question to ask. Wikileaks is not compromised and JA is most probably alive and well. This is all a big distraction to create division and doubts among the good guys.
If the deep state take out Julian, it will not be long before his closest friends learn about it and tell the world. You cannot cover up the death of one of the most important person on Earth right now for so long without anyone noticing.
▼ cultivated_ignorance
You cant have a panopticon without people knowing they're in a panopticon.
▼ nomorepepperoni
People who believe Assange is missing seem to believe the CIA/NSA/deep state now run the place, and are using leaks as a form of "limited hangout" or distraction from the pedos.
I don't personally believe this theory, but understand why some do. One of them could probably better explain.
▼ DICKFART_
could be other wikileaks employees; could be a CIA limited hangout.
▼ bignickwicked
It's about time. I've been saying all along that he's been gone since October.
▼ privatepizza
He's holding a WL press conference in 8 minutes, over on twitter. Why not ask him if he's gone?
▼ awshidahak
I mean, if you're trying to get banned from twitter that'd be a good way to do it.
▼ privatepizza
I understand there's a major censorship op happening, however on the other hand there are still many hundreds of people tweeting about #pizzagate and #pedogate over on twitter, every minute of every day.
EDIT, Apologies! Incorrect answer
▼ nomorepepperoni
Someone there better have a livestream FFS (or multiple). Nobody who believes in "AssangeIsMissing" is going to buy random text "HE CAME TO THE WINDOW!" or fuzzy ass photos or dated video.
▼ Redpilled_Canadian
Hope this works to bring him out. We need to confirm this vault 7 is really from him...
▼ derram
https://snew.github.io/r/AssangeProofOfLife/ :
This has been an automated message.