YingYangMom

I just assume and I explained why.

YingYangMom

So Steele isn't Ex-CIA. He still is CIA. Why else would he defend the CIA Maccobys and their mission in Haiti when we all know that Silsby was going to traffick 100 children from THEIR orphanage and not any other one? There are over 700 Haiti orphanages in Haiti for crying out loud. What are the odds??!

sound_of_silence

i'm not trying to hate on this dude in a personal way.. i firmly believe a Useful tool is a tool worth having until that tool is no longer Useful... and firmly believe we should use him in that capacity (same goes for alex jones et al) until he's no longer useful...

nevertheless, i have some things against him...

  • there are 13 satanic illuminati families http://archive.is/pvDKg and there is only 1 asian family.. the Li family.. and they aren't 'good' either...

  • the war for pizzagate is not reliant upon partisan anything either... pizzagate is self-reliant, self-sustaining and self-replicating...

  • all trump needs is for us, we the people, to tell him what to do (send those postcards for a start) and keep telling him (like with the marches) until he does it... it wasn't the laptop that got him elected... it was skippy's emails.. that's what brought over the remnant to his side, because his side was the "anybody but hillary side"..

my impression of RS is that he knows as much as he's been instructed to know, if you know what i mean.

dFrog

I just watched this. If you don't understand his position when it comes to the Maccobys, I suggest you listen again. If you still don't, I question your comprehension or motives.

cantsleepawink

Well, understand mine - piss off. Someone isn't going to tell me where the boundaries are in terms of researching this. The genie is out of the bottle.

dFrog

I really don't think he's saying, "Don't look into anyone with the name Maccoby." The number one rule is never look the other way just because someone said to. Ever. I'm pretty sure his message is, "Don't slander or harass people." After all, that is not professional investigative conduct. There is no use for that in investigation. Imagine if someone you knew was under investigation for a crime by the police and the police spammed their personal and professional social media accounts with accusations, posted the accusations matter-of-factly on message boards, etc.

Now, I doubt that most of the people doing the solid research are behaving that way, but we do have a mob element. There are people who will believe what we post here just the same as there are others who will believe what they see on TV news. If you look at all of us as a whole, we are almost certainly responsible for at least some harassment and/or slander against innocent people. We've had false leads, misdirection, etc. It happens.

I can't see an issue with the message: Be responsible about what you're doing. The fact of the matter is that most of us are not professionals. Some of us may have professional skills (or greater), but that doesn't necessarily translate to conduct .

VieBleu

We have more than a mob element - it has become the dominant voice here. Probably mostly because of shillage, but the average bigot is more than happy to follow along.

cantsleepawink

Well, Mr Nobel Peace Prize nominee better round up all his pals and start arresting the pedos pretty sharp then...because the more we dig the higher the number of individuals associated with, friends with, colleagues with pedos, will be gathered into the research net.

And from the video, it seems he does want the mob numbers to increase.

MenschUp

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

Proof That Steven Spielberg is a Child Molester https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/proof-that-steven-spielberg-is-a-child-molester/

throwAway246

I don't know why some of you guys are so negative, did you even watch the video?

Some points from the interview:

-Intelligence agencies have been collecting data for decades and are using it to blackmail politicians (McCain, Graham, Rubio, Schumer...)

-Trump must win support of the larger public

-Pedophilia will bring down the house of cards, including republican politicians

-Electoral reform act is needed

-NATO is a cover for illegal activities, not for projecting military power

-Google is a covert organization

This is not a conclusive list, there's a lot more.

pocketfulofstones

Operation postcard starts now!

https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/1720434

This is the simplest way you can get involved and get the ball rolling.

cantsleepawink

I'm not negative at all. I like Sacha. I think your boy though is throwing in some disinfo with the truth and..I don't like his attitude towards citizen researchers.

Btw: I knew that Google was a covert operation over 10 years ago.

equineluvr

RDS:

Defends pedophiles, says not to arrest them / Defends pedos the Maccobys / "Former" CIA officer, LMAO! / Nobel Peace Prize (!) nominee / Espouses "alien" bullcrap /

He has ZERO credibility.

dFrog

1.) A truth-and-reconciliation outlook is not defending pedophiles. 2.) We don't know for sure that the Maccobys are pedophiles. He stuck up for two that he knows personally: A woman who does art and her father. (I don't remember their names.) 3.) "There's no such thing as an ex-CIA officer" is just a meme. "LMAO" doesn't cut it.

Really, if you want to know what he has to say about CIA, read his work. This guy isn't just a mouthpiece, he's got a shitload of written stuff. Everyone just seems to think they can just dish out little quips based on tiny little segments of things he's said and call him "debunked." The truth is more complicated than that approach.

Maybe if Victurus Libertas have him on again, he can address some specifics. I know he kind of already did.

equineluvr

How does NOT ARRESTING PEDOS equate to "truth and reconciliation?" Can't WAIT to hear this one.

"There's no such thing as an ex-CIA officer' is just a meme." No, it is more of a stereotype. Like most stereotypes, there is TRUTH in it which is why it has endured for decades. It reflects the LIFELONG LOYALTY that "former" CIA hold for the "company." (Using mafioso term because the CIA basically is the mafia AFAIC.)

dFrog

The most important point about dealing with the pedos is that, as he said, if you execute the first twelve pedophiles you catch, you won't get the rest of them. It is a tried-and-true method to get people to turn on the rest of the network. If you smash them and throw the book at them, they are much, much less likely to squeal. Certainly, he's talking about the most powerful pedophiles, not the kinds that we've seen busted since January. To say that he thinks we "shouldn't arrest pedophiles" is an exaggeration to the point of falseness.

Here's another point that a lot of people probably can't handle: If it were me and I had all of these pedophiles lined up, I'd gun them all down. If it were up to me, they'd be slaughtered en masse, dumped in a mass grave, pissed on, and burned. That feels right. But is it really the mature thing to do? If you could choose between upending the deep state, restoring democracy, and doing away with the corrupt system that has allowed pedophiles to get away with their crimes for decades or slaughtering each pedophile we catch, which would you choose?

"Once CIA, always CIA" as a stereotype. Sure. I don't disagree with that word, but there's nothing logical about assuming it by default, especially not of a man who has written several books, in his own words, "calling for the evisceration of CIA." He has called CIA's activities "legalized crime" for Wall Street.

Like I said, you need to do better than that.

cantsleepawink

Trump won't meet with him. I wonder why that is ?

dFrog

Because Priebus is blocking him and Bannon may not want to share Trump's ear.

cantsleepawink

He's sent out out quite a few calling cards on the internet already. Trump is his own man. That excuse doesn't wash with me.

dFrog

Why does Steele need to have an excuse as to why Trump hasn't contacted him? Even if Trump saw him on YouTube and decided not to contact him, it wouldn't mean that it's because Steele is a bullshitter. Wouldn't Steele know much more about the government than Trump, anyway? What is the likelihood that Trump would ask for someone else's opinion about Steele before making a decision, assuming he knew of him and his whole thing? You can't really say it's unlikely. Say he does do that, what is the likelihood that that person either 1.) would have poor judgment 2.) would be "compromised," or otherwise more in-line with Deep State interests?

You really have to keep the complexity of social interaction and situational awareness in mind to make any meaningful guesses about why someone did or didn't do this or that. Unknown unknowns, incomplete information, inaccurate information, misunderstandings, misinterpretations, misjudgments, mis-remembering, then deceit, malice, etc.

cantsleepawink

I only asked the Trump question to trigger you. I'm complex too.

JastheMace

....but.....but David Icke says lizard aliens are to blame too? Not sicko pedo's, fucking lizard aliens.

equineluvr

I know about Icke's crap. What's your point? Icke is not the topic here, Steele is.

cantsleepawink

Agree. I find it amusing that he's upset about the 'overzealous citizen investigators' because the 'professional investigators' would never make the same mistakes. People like him don't even have the good grace to feel ashamed that it's citizens who are taking it upon themselves to do something in order to pressurize the politicians and police to action because the 'professionals' are doing fuck all. And this has been going on for decades now. They all need a rocket up their collective asses. And I hope we are giving it to them good.

PGTAway818949

The professional investigators all get murdered.... That's why this de centralized model terrifies them, they can't kill everyone.

V____Z

He took a job working for the CIA - what else do you need to know about a person's character? "Hmmm, what should i do with my life. Save people? Nah, how about KILL people legally! Overthrow governments! Lie to my fellow Americans!! YEAH GREAT IDEA."