You can't say porn causes harm. There is an overwhelming amount of porn consumers who don't do harm at all.

It's a correlation. Please inform yourself on the difference between cause and correlation. That's basics if you want to understand studies.

As a man I can say that there are 2 ways to see sex, as intimate, or as fun and who cares about the partner. So to address that "objectification" aI think is a part of solving this issue as a species. Everything in the media is so sexualized too, it's just one of many many things we need to look at if we are ever to make this go away imo.

Here's her website and she has a book out now https://www.conchitasarnoff.com/

Yes, these are your beliefs, fair enough. but the studies only show that persons who tend to abuse with a certain significance also tend to massive porn consume. A correlation that has to be weighed against other correlations. there are for sure persons who tend to massively consume porn who are no abusers etc.

I can only repeat: this is no proper scientifc work. The method would demand blinds and control groups. Not only are not all other parameters/correlations excluded, we cannot draw any causal effect from that correlation.

Where are all the experts at? There research would be valuable to getting to the bottom of pizzagate.

No hard evidence. All these studies fail to realize that correlation is not causation. A common failure in science reception.

You are right

Trump says Bill Clinton has a Jeffrey Epstein problem (2/27/2015)

I was a little bit disappointed by the end of the interview. Stressing it all on "boy's education" and porn consumption is shooting fractionally wide. There are female predators as well and there is no scientific proof for the "horrible-things-come-out-of-porn-habituation"-hypothesis. That one is distracting.

However, the account of the two ladies is accurate. It all can be double-checked in the www anytimes.

Clinton info starts around 23:00