Hi Honeybee. It is definitely Pizzagate-related. That wasn't the problem. The problem is it is unsourced, which we don't allow because 90% of the forum-sliding shitposts from the enemies of this investigation are also unsourced discussion posts -- this rule allows us to remove them easily.

Here's how I would approach it: add a little discussion of how Pedogate investigations have progressed in Belgium, the UK and Australia, how people got involved, and what the result was -- and link to the sources of that information. That would turn this into a research post about what has been done in the past that worked, and where it fell short. And, it naturally dovetails into the content of this post: "Here's what WE are going to do..."

Does that make sense? I know the submission guidelines are somewhat burdensome and seem designed to slow people down. But when our legit users who are excellent researchers and care very much about this issue are willing to step up their game to make submissions at that level, it causes maximum trouble for all those who say there's nothing to see here, most especially for the Brock minions hired to spread disinfo and discouragement and disrupt the investigation. There was one of them just on 4chan spilling the beans, so we are succeeding. Check it out: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/117135062#p117136770