Some of this stuff looks bot-generated. Some of it looks like server chat logs or other transcripts which could've been hacked, and thus leaked. So it's either an absolute load of bollocks or somebody is communicating data which is not as random as it might appear. It could be some kind of bargaining plea, it could even be the result of a dead man's switch.

Actually, this has Karin Waldergrave written all over it.

https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/53/531436_news-u-won-t-find-in-the-news-.html

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1704972

Here is my issues with these like Catherine Agnew's. Yes, I believe they have been abused and MKUltra used on them. It's freaking heartbreaking! However, through design by their handlers they have intermittent bouts of truthfulness. Most, of the time though it is incoherent ramblings. Not blaming them or making light of their situation. I tried going through Catherine's 100's on twitter accounts, and it becomes obvious real fast that names she recently reads about or hears on the TV at that time she goes off on. No way does she have interactions with all those people she names. So, trying to separate what might be bits of truth is mindbogglingly. I truly do not think anyone newly researching this will ever beable to crack them. A professional in working with those who have been MK Ultra mind controlled is imperative.

@muzungu1 : welcome to Voat. Please review the submission guidelines for v/pizzagate research posts in the sidebar. You need to clearly state your premise about how this is related to the sexual abuse and trafficking of minors by the global elite, and provide links to sources that support that. Removing per Rule 1 and 2.