( pizzagate )

submitted by [deleted]

Shillbilly

What a fucking retard, Pepe the nazi mascotte

rooting4redpillers

To define pizzagate as the false idea that a pizza parlor in Washington, D.C., is the center of a child-trafficking ring involving Clinton campaign manager John Podesta is wishful thinking. They wIsh, so bad, that's ALL it is. Too late.

PG_IsRidiculous

Actually to define pizzagate that way is being honest and not using the dishonest tactic of changing the narrative. But anyway you people are insane and actually believe that such a ridiculous conspiracy theory could be true...so I feel sorry for you.

DarkMath

I wonder if Nate538 is related to AreWeSure.

AreWeSure has been "debunking" pizzagate for several months now:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1741395/8524571

He's quite a piece of work.

;-)

MyNameIsLuka

Yeah, I saw this earlier on Reddit. Sorry, it's crap.

Jem777

This screams of desperation that Nate538 even brings this up. They do not want to ever say the words pizzagate. Now they are trapped.

WastedF

https://archive.is/Ti11c

enter a larger online discourse. The most striking example has been “Pizzagate,” the false idea that a pizza parlor in Washington, D.C., is the center of a child-trafficking ring involving Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, which prompted a man from North Carolina to “self-investigate” the shop, where he fired a rifle several times and threatened an employee.

MyNameIsLuka

How has he proven it's false? Because he said so in an opinion piece? So, if I state it's absolutely true in an opinion piece you're going to take my word for it also?

shizzle_mcbobblehead

What does this prove?

Do you know how evidence works?