( pizzagate )

submitted by [deleted]

DarkMath

"Begging to prolong the conversation."

Oh, so you're afraid of me. That's fine. But just know that means:

1) You're a coward.

2) You're a shill.

;-)

DarkMath

" no coming back "

Oh, so you're afraid of me. That's fine. But just know that means:

1) You're a coward.

2) You're a shill.

;-)

DarkMath

"confirmed shill"

See my response here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1744494/8540226

DarkMath

"Supporting "peanut-gate" Didn't have the balls to post reply on the public forum"

I'd be glad to respond. Please reply with the specific comment and I'll post a reply.

rwb

Some quick reading shows Darkmath’s very first VOAT submission was this: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1453292 titled John Podesta and deleted emails. The question is, would Darkmath shine a spotlight on what is arguably the most sensitive and potentially damaging evidence that JP may have had involvement in McCann’s disappearance if he was a so called shill? The PG puzzle is so complex that the probability there will be universal agreement on all aspects by everyone is obviously zero, yet anyone who dissents on anything is at risk of being labeled a shill. If the OP is sincere in intent, it’s recklessness of a high order, but I suspect otherwise. Of his posts that have run into, I find myself disagreeing with Darkmath’s ideas at times, but on the whole, his leaning is obvious. If you want to claim someone’s a shill, at least have the temerity to post all those specific examples from their comment history that supports your case. I would wager the OP cannot muster three good examples.

rwb

Hmmm... member for one month, with one submission and one comment? I regret dignifying the OP with any response before reading member history. There is a minimum amount of content expected from VOAT members in order to qualify one to even make such a claim, and AltrightPsyOp is not remotely there. In fact, the nature of his first post betrays intent to a degree that is silly.

DarkMath

Sigh......AltRightisPsyOp you posted this earlier you dipshit. What the fuck is up with you? Here I'll copy in my previous comment where you were known as CNNPsyOp;

I know 2 things:

1) I'm on the pizzagateshills list.

2) I'm not a shill.

So that kinda discredits this post and /v/pizzagateshills .

Anyone is welcome to look through my 2000+ comments eviscerating every shill that comes here. I'll answer any question you have if you suspect any of those comments points to me being a shill.

Absent that the OP posted bullshit and @CNNPsyOp is either a shill himself or an idiot.

Which is it CNNPsyOp?

druhill007

This is armyseers set of links?

It's actually REALLY informative when you figure out who the advanced shills are. They lead you right to the truth in only a few posts it's great. Not implying ur a shill dm :)

DarkMath

What's your point druhill007?

druhill007

Eh just that when you figure out shills it's a nice tactic to keep it to yourself and watch them lead you to the truth. If I remember once I get home I'll send U message

equineluvr

"Anyone is welcome to look through my 2000+ comments eviscerating every shill that comes here."

The problem is, you can't discern between a shill and a nonshill.

DarkMath

Actually I can. You're talking about how often I'm right which is about 85%. But that's ok, the other 15% I'm wrong about we end up clearing the air and then laughing it off.

I recall accusing you of being a shill a couple times. But I was wrong. You're the real deal. I actually like to formally apologize. Equineluvr I am sorry. Will you accept my apology?.