Because if he is Bill Hicks that somehow makes him less fake? I would argue even moreso fake! Anyone who searches out his nye 1999 radio program will know the true nature of his deceit... he should be jailed for a long time from this "stunt" which i believe was stratfor testing the waters on how much pull they have in the far right community. Luckily not many bit on it.

I do know for a fact hes not the original alex jones who was taller slimmer and fair haired. That should be inarguable among most.

He has miles and birthmarks in the same areas. Also in one of Bill Hicks final standup routines he slips up and says he is going to play a guy name Al and then he catches himself.

I can't believe this has 9 downvotes with a the evidence ZunarJ5 is dropping. Hey guys check out those links if you want your mind blown.

DarkMath is not a shill dude. I know he rubs some people the wrong way, but I've been here a long time and he's easily one of the most intelligent folks here.

Newfind http://www.alexjonesisbillhicks.com/

Dipshit I'm not a shill. Go look at my 2000+ comments.

Listen up, the Bill Hicks thing is a hoax just like The Flat Earth. You're not fooling anyone.

"faggot shit:"

Really? You said Alex Jones is really Bill Hicks. That's the 2nd oldest CIA disinfo routine after "The Flat Earth(tm)".

You don't even know who Bill Hicks is.

LOL. You're not American are you Newfind. Your shill masters need to give you better insults. "Ask your Mom" is 1950s - 1960ish.

Why are you shilling for organ harvesters and child rapists?

"his true identity is Bill Hicks"

Bill Hicks? Holy fucking guacamole you're an idiot. Bill Hicks? Fuck off. Only a shill or an idiot would think that.

Which are you?

Also according to Texas Law he had 30 days to retract his statement or he would liable for punitive damges in a defamation lawsuit

The Defamation Mitigation Act

The first was HB 1759 called the Defamation Mitigation Act, often referred to as the Retraction Statute, which became law as of June 14, 2013. The purpose of the law is to encourage people who feel they have been defamed to demand a retraction and allow publishers to do it.

Here ‘s how it works. A plaintiff has to notify a publisher about an allegedly defamatory statement within 90 days of learning about it. If a plaintiff fails to do so, they may not be able to seek punitive damages or bring suit until this process takes place. The statute lays out the specifics about what needs to be in the notice including a particular statement identifying the defamatory statement and when and where the publication was made. The publisher then has 30 days to correct the mistake by publishing a correction, an apology or the prospective plaintiff’s own statement.

The retraction must be “published in the same manner and medium as the original publication or, if that is not possible, with a prominence and in a manner and medium reasonably likely to reach substantially the same audience as the publication complained of.” There is a detailed process about challenging the sufficiency of the correction.

If the plaintiff fails to follow this procedure, or the publisher takes corrective action within 30 days, the plaintiff can still sue, but can no longer seek punitive damages unless the plaintiff can show actual malice. If the plaintiff files suit without sending the notification, there is also a process that would allow the defendant to abate the case and allow for the process to take place.

http://www.emedialaw.com/2013-texas-legislature-watch-retracting-the-defamation-and-notifying-about-the-hack/

Watch the Joe Rogan/Alex Jones podcast and think to yourself Joe Rogan is 49 and Alex Jones is 42. I mean I didn't believe it for a LONG time and hey I might be wrong, but from everything I've seen there is a good case for it.

Newfind, I hadn't thought about that, but I think you're right!!

Kevin Booth wrote in a book that the day Bill Hicks died, he was driving off and Hicks jumped in the truck and said he had pulled it off, he faked his death. Look into it, Kevin Booth wrote about it.

As a matter of fact, there is a good chance he has already been sued henceforth the pathetic groveling because he knows if he is called to testify under oath he will be compelled at risk of perjury to reveal he is Bill Hicks.

Not funny.