FriesischShipping 2017-03-27T21:28:29

alefantischickenlover

link

mathemagician33 2017-03-27T20:50:49

I always thought this was one of the pictures that simply can't be "explained away" with anything reasonable. His explanation of the girl with taped down wrists as a "joke that was thought of by her sister" was ludicrous, but he can't even claim anything of the sort with this picture. He uses a known pedophilia reference ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=chicken+lover&defid=11330674) ) AND the adult is wearing a necklace that signals an interest in analingus ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sex%20bracelets) ).

link

Zeeeffgee33 2017-03-27T22:09:00

Can still be explained away as 'a tasteless joke, mea culpa should not have done it but the shear ludicrousness of the notion is what makes it a joke.'

link

mathemagician33 2017-03-27T22:32:37

That's Scott Wolman (sp?) and his child in the photo. What father would agree to a 'joke' of that nature? I just don't see that explanation holding up.

link

Zeeeffgee33 2017-03-28T00:31:33

It's obviously a reference to the things you noted. So the explanation for it is what? If not a joke why else would the father consent to that description? This is just to say alternative explanations do exist. Suppose the larger point is only someone familiar with that scene would know the terminology and feel comfortable using it in any context.

link

mathemagician33 2017-03-28T00:50:19

well, if it's not a joke, that would imply the father is into pedophilia. It's clear by now this kind of thing often involves entire families where the children are abused starting when they are infants. THAT is the only reasonable explanation imo.