( pizzagate )

submitted by [deleted]

KnightsofHubris

Napkin map in White House. Deputy assistant to Trump drew map on a napkin cutting libya into three zones. Should we investigate?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/10/libya-partition-trump-administration-sebastian-gorka

Vindicator

@EndTBTB ; I need to remove this per Rule 1; you haven't demonstrated any evidence of a connection to child sexual abuse by elite globalists. Sorry. :-( Do keep investigating. Might be worth searching for the names of people we know or suspect of being pedos, or pedo enablers. If you haven't read the Pizzagate.wiki, it's a good place to start for names. There was a post on here earlier that I left up about Florida college kids busted for sex trafficking. The girl had a profile pic of her with Bill Clinton. There is a very slim chance she might have been one of Epstein's girls. You could check the flight manifest.

KnightsofHubris

Why would think it's anything but a map on a napkin?

First of you should figure out what the email is about.

This email is not written by anyone at Stratfor or has the Opinions of anyone at Stratfor. This is an article that appeared else where and has been translated.

Note who the email is sent to

To [email protected]

and its says this text came from

Text of report by Qatari government-funded aljazeera.net website on 10 October

So this is probably the English translation of an article on Aljazeera.net.

The article is [Unattributed report: "Erekat's Claim Against Al-Jazeera Dismissed"]

However, no articles come up with that title in a Google search.....probably because the article was not in English.

The other text in email gives you enough to search on to figure out what this is about. Somebody complained about a TV show, but his complaint was denied. The part you quote is literally someone talking about a TV news report and the napkin is part of that.

After some googling, this is what that email is about

http://www.aljazeera.com/palestinepapers/2011/01/2011122114239940577.html

SoSpricyHotDog

Can you cite the source? Link? Some context would be helpful, as this could literally and simply just be a map hand drawn on a napkin. I think I found the source and considering they're discussing a TV station airing a session re: settlement boundaries, it seems like it is exactly that.

Sorry!

Although, searching for the word "napkin" by itself generated some other strange results. I didn't sift through them however, short on time at the moment.

carmencita

Well, since these are negotiations by elites, we can surmise that some are pedophiles. They are also form Stratfor. So there is a possibility there could be something to this. Again, when some people are in a restaurant with cloth dinner napkins, they just may use it to informally draw something on a napkin. So maybe someone can do some research on this Saeb Erekat?

KnightsofHubris

Well, since these are negotiations by elites, we can surmise that some are pedophiles.

Nope.

carmencita

I did not say all, I said some. So you say Nope, which means none. I beg to differ, since that is what this site is about. Bringing down the elite pedophile politicians, of which there are some.

KnightsofHubris

yeah, this is fabulously terrible reasoning.

What's the numbers, the ratios? How many elites do you need in a room before you're guaranteed one pedo. How does this compare with the general population? If some of them are pedophiles, would they be comfortable revealing that to the ones that aren't? Especially when the meeting was about a land swap between the Israelis and the Palestianians?

Hey, before we discuss the settlements around East Jerusalem, I have something to say. It's funny that we are using this map. Because I am a MAP, a Minor Atrracted Person. I like young boys is what I'm trying to say. I just wanted to let you guys now, you we're all elites I can tell you guys, right? We cool? OK, now back to those settlements.

You can read my post above where I show exactly what this email refers to. No one at Stratfor put the map on a napkin. That was on a TV news report.

carmencita

My point is that the person that posted this has every right to further investigate it. There may be nothing to it, or something. We are not privy to info like the FBI or the NSA, thus when we research we have to decide when to go forward or not. I am not going to tell that person when to stop researching that is there decision. A lot of the info that we have found is because people went the extra mile. This could end up as something or nothing. That is all I am saying.