joeysaperv

"He allegedly said he blamed the victim for initiating the acts and said she was a “willing participant.”

This mentality is probably one of the reasons pedos have such a high rate of repeat offenses.

anonOpenPress

YNW is a source I wouldn't pay much attention to. On this one, they are:

  1. seriously late, see https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1730276
  2. painting the topic politically (harmful considering cooperation between parties to address the bigger issue)
  3. claiming ongoing "urgent investigation into the elite pedophile ring" without proof and without a source
  4. Posting this old news on April 1st, which is not the best date regarding credibility

Better sources on this story

chordwonder

Pedophiles come in all flavors, not just Democrat. By making it a partisan issue, you alienate the good people of the opposing party, which we need for cooperation in combatting the problem.

joeysaperv

Um, it's in the title of the article.

chordwonder

Doesn't matter who is doing it. The point is it needs to stop & you posted it.

joeysaperv

More information is better than less. Fuck off.

chordwonder

I see you're a great unifier...lol. I thought so. You don't want to bust pedos, you want to keep the partisan bickering going. Good job! The elites love you! But they will drop you like a hot potato when the floor drops out from under them, assuming you're not one of them or their operatives. More & more are waking up everyday to how the elite use the divide & conquer method to perpetuate their agendas. Gonna get lonely for the dividers. I'll "fuck off" when I feel like it. Nothing you can do about it.

joeysaperv

That's true, however, all I see is projection from you. If the investigation were only on republicans or democrats, then that would be partisan. However, when there is a conviction and the affiliations are noted, then that is fact-based reporting.

Let me try this, if this is what you want:

A person of undetermined age and gender was sentenced to jail. This person may or may not have had a job. This person may or may not have had a party affiliation. The person did have a family, but stating the marital status and response of family members would be giving out too much information. The suspect was in contact with a spiritual councellor of undetermined affiliation."

Fuck off

chordwonder

Actually you are the one projecting. I spoke civilly. I don't have to fuck off. Ignore me, I don't mind. Will that same reporter put 'republican' in the title, or even report it all, when it's a republican? Not likely. That's partisanship.

joeysaperv

Put republican in the name. What in the world do you think the Franklin scandal involved ?

Fuck off with your nanny censoring

chordwonder

You are really mature, eh? Talk about projecting...not gonna fuck off...lol.

joeysaperv

Yeah, you're going to keep demanding the censoring of information for "unity". What BS

chordwonder

I demanded nothing. Just stating my opinion, like you. But I'm doing it civilly. Like adults do.