Sorry @burntheswamp , gotta remove this per Rule 4; you've written an unsourced discussion post instead of a support-linked research post. Please repost in our speculative sub v/pizzagatewhatever or v/askpizzagate . Thanks. Also, we've had to become more strict about enforcing the submission guidelines due to heavy shilling (check out the bans and removals - it's been ugly), so please review the community-established submission guidelines for v/pizzagate research posts in the sidebar on the right (view desktop site if on mobile).

Also, a friendly reminder of the Voat User Agreement :

Can I submit links to any subverse I want?

Each subverse has its own rules which are usually stated in the respective subverse's sidebar. If you ignore said rules, your account may be banned from submitting further content to the subverse or in some cases, globally.

nice post ...... james

No, that is to say Jimmy Saville was a double agent. Alefantis is our Saville. Pedo pimp who hates children. One is dead and exposed, and the other is alive and free.

Is it possible you're a bunch of insane conspiratards believing ridiculous shit?

Hi! I created the following archive link(s) for this voat submission:

OriginLink	ArchiveOrg	ArchiveIS
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1769840	archive.org link	archive.is link

No.

YES for sure! Double agent? YES

Undercover? YES

Double agent of what type?? We don't know what

You can speculate on his "mission" but no one knows beyond what he publicized on Instagram

Maybe he is just a fav entertainment administrator of the elite such as the role of madam

He is clearly very high up in the "society that is running things"

As you observed, you don't have MSM doing full stories of defense on you if you aren't worth defending. He is worth a lot to someone.

I completely believe your hunches are spot on and to me, that part seems obvious.

Am not sure who is spewing out the comments "NO" here on voat

No what? Can anyone explain why JA made the top 49? Can anyone explain why MSM is rushing to his defense in the most stupid way?

Interviewer: "Are you running a child trafficking ring from this pizza shop?"

JA: "No. Absolutely not."

Interviewer / Turning to the camera: "See? There is nothing going on here. This is all an online prank aimed at destroying this small business. Back to you Jim."

Viewer: WTF???

No.

No. He enjoys it too much.

That's tough to say. But I am about 95% sure we're going to find out sooner rather than later. This thing will start collapsing in late Spring and by Fall everything will have finally come out.

In the past 4 months I've reexamined all the "conspiracy theories" that I once believed hook, line and sinker. Only now after going over all the evidence on both sides of the equation have I come to understand how massive this fraud is.

I heard a few people like FBIAnon say this thing could bring down the whole government. I didn't believe them at the time. I do now.

I also kind of believed @AreWeSure when it(preferred pronouns any time you're ready AreWeSure) would gas light people. I remember AreWeSure saying Hillary Clinton being arrested was "pure fantasy". My heart kind of sank when AreWeSure seemed to imply these people are too powerful to be arrested.

That was a month ago. Today I'm sending AreWeSure emails warning it to buckle up in the event it was so stupid to have believed the people that told it Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong. I don't think AreWeSure is smart enough to be a shill. AreWeSure can't conceive the magnitude of the crimes so it goes along with it.

Where have we heard that before? Anyone? Who said when a lie gets big enough it has its own credibility?

"It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously."

The Big Lie

I finally have figured out AreWeSure. AreWeSure isn't a shill. AreWeSure is just acting how most human beings would act when they hear a story that at first seems too incredible to be true. The first reaction is to believe what we're told. The Big Lie comes with its own credibility. And then any subsequent rationalization accrets to the initial belief nothing is out of the ordinary.

Isn't that what Occams Razor is about? It's usually the least unlikely theory that turns out to be correct. The problem is with The Big Lie Occam's Razor no longer applies. It's actually THE MOST unlikely scenario that turns out to be true.

no

If JA was helping to entrap anyone, he apparently sux at it.

No.

Application of Occam's razor is in order here.

It's actually very simple: Alefantis is a connected pedo pervert POS who supplies children to the "elites."
Jones and Cernovich are gatekeepers/disinfo agents.