Actually, I followed that whole thing in real time. Sigh.

I have seen the pictures of Tate and Polanski having fun in Europe after her "murder".

The whole thing about the "crime" was so poorly faked that it would not even make Nickelodeon caliber propaganda today.

Go and look at the ridiculous photos wherein corpses moved position, etc. Nothing about the "evidence" presented was the least bit plausible. The room did not even look like a rich person's place but a crack house. The autopsy photos do not even slightly resemble Tate.

Remember there was no internet, the masses had no voice, and prurient sensationalism printed the story in some people's minds.

Years later, a fake twin sister, for whom there was no prior existence, appeared on TV, having the same very unique features of Tate--particularly a unique ear anomaly that she failed to hide when she coughed during an interview.

The whole thing was a psyop--by the intelligence services who work very hard to shape the reality perceived by the masses who cannot think (that's why there is TV), a distraction, and was sensationalized to an amazing degree. It would never wash today, even with the most ignorant.

But people are only slightly more sophisticated now, still, the spooks only do as much as they have to. Look at the Westminster, London hoax, they take the "perp" or a dummy of him, on a gurney past six ambulances--which are empty with open doors--and wheel him into the lobby of the Marriott hotel, when the real hospital is accross the street. That's how stupid people are.