CORRECTION: My last post on Chicken Hawk Documentary being Pro-Pedo was INCORRECT! (Chicken Hawk still means what we think it does though) ( pizzagate )

submitted by matheasysolutions

My last post ( https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1784728) ) has a very misleading headline! I glanced over the Wikipedia article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Hawk:_Men_Who_Love_Boys) ) too fast and made the assumption it was pro-pedo when it was the opposite. I was researching for my Part 22 video ( https://mes.fm/pizzagate-voat) ) and a pro-pedo site was referencing that wiki page so I wrongly assumed it was pro-pedo too at first glance. Sorry for the wrong headline!

Chicken Hawk still means what we think it does though: Adult man chasing after young man/boy. I assume "Chicken Lover" means something similar if not the same thing: https://snag.gy/ygZWji.jpg

B_dog

If this is the video I saw some time ago, around the 33 minute mark some guys talking over lunch use the term "buck" to refer to pedos. Hmmm...

equineluvr

"made the assumption it was pro-pedo when it was the opposite."

STILL incorrect. It is neither.

These issues are not binary. This is not a math equation. :)

From Wikipedia: "Sideman's evenhanded approach provides the audience with an insight into the group members' psyches. The film has drawn attention for its unique approach: letting its subjects, the NAMBLA members, incriminate themselves in a public forum."

The film describes the organization and its history. It presents a series of interviews with NAMBLA members who describe their feelings towards boys and justifications for such feelings. Scenes in the movie include a group of NAMBLA members participating in the 1993 March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation. NAMBLA members argue for NAMBLA's inclusion in the gay rights movement, to the disapproval of other attendees. Photographs of shirtless, or otherwise sexually positioned, boys are shown from the NAMBLA bulletin, as well as several drawings of nude boyish characters with wings. Leyland Stevenson describes a sexual encounter with a boy, in which Stevenson received oral sex from the boy, as a "religious experience." An interaction of Stevenson with another boy is shown, in which the boy makes a prank phone call. Stevenson, observing the boy and engaging him in conversation, suggests that the boy was flirting with him. The interview of a school teacher fired for his membership in NAMBLA is given. Several threatening messages are left on another member's answering machine.

Poet and free speech advocate Allen Ginsberg, NAMBLA's most famous member and defender, appeared in the documentary and read a "graphic ode to youth".[2] His belief that pederasts deserve a color on the rainbow flag (ultra violet?) is largely argued against today.

The movie features outspoken NAMBLA members Leyland Stevenson, Renatto Corazzo, Peter Melzer and Chuck Dodson.

In this New York Newsday review,[6] the reviewer addressed the controversy: "To say Sideman has taken a hands-off position is a horrific pun, but it's also true,"

cheese_pizza_lover

You tin foil hatters are sad. You people jump to wild conclusions based on strong delusions. Pizzagate is fake news. Fake news hurts real people. Leave the Honorable Mr. James Alefantis alone. Hermes heaps heavy helpings. C3+P16+P16=cheese 3.16

Omnicopy

What does that mean? Who is Hermes?

YingYangMom

Good on you to have set the record straight expediently. These things happen, you know. It happened to me not too long ago, so I can totally relate :)

ReyaPhemhurth

Thank you for the correction :) It means a lot that you did the research and you weren't afraid to let us know.

matheasysolutions

Thanks! This was a good lesson to learn. Also, it shows why the MSM and political elites want to shut down free-speech online, because they know an uncensored hive-mind can easily spot their lies...

ReyaPhemhurth

Exactly, and knowledge is the real power. Unfortunately though 'they' have the ability to stifle us for the time being. :(