Because you are a shill and deserve to be exposed. I already have all your comments archived because you personally make an interesting case study for analyzing pattern behavior and using it to connect associated user accounts among other things.

:)

Even though you’ve been here longer than me, it appears you do not know how Voat works. Allow me the privilege of explaining.

Voat is an uncensored open forum. Under frequently asked questions, Voat says: While we don't necessarily approve or agree with all content that users submit to Voat, our policy is to not meddle and not censor content unless said content is illegal in the United States.

In other words, Voat not only lets uncensored comments be posted, they aggregate those comments so other users can read them and respond. There is no Voat rule that one cannot peruse a member's previous comments and respond to them if inclined. You are just as free to peruse my comments and respond whenever you’re inclined. In fact, I’d encourage you to do so.

You've alluded to me following you before. If I were responding to a significant number of your posts, say half, quarter, or even a tenth of them, you might have a point, but you’ve made some 1600 Voat posts, and I’ve responded to perhaps 15 of them, meaning I’ve responded to just .9% of your posts. In other words, 99.1% or the vast majority of your posts are not responded to by me. Of the .9% of posts I've responded to, all were in measured response to your ceaseless efforts to malign Alex Jones and Infowars, and by logical extension, all of his guests.

A while back, you and I reached a tacit agreement on Jones. See here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1774072/8692558/10#8692558 You were exasperated that I had the nerve to continue to answer to your attacks on Jones in spite of your protestations. In distress, you explained the impossibility of being able to stop talking about him, and presented a specific case indicating necessity. I explained my desire was not to ruin you the way you want to ruin Jones, but merely to ensure Jones is not unreasonably slandered and vilified.

I proved same when you accused me of downvoting. I told you I was keenly listening to the video and could find no reason to object to your thread or your remarks of that moment. And in further good faith I elected not to challenge several remarks you made about Jones in the days thereafter, because they struck me as being reasonable. But since you are a person who has no honor, you kept dialing up your attacks until I was forced to begin responding once again. When I resumed countermeasures, they were proportional, perhaps even restrained, but you seem unable to appreciate my restraint.

You have virtually no respect for your fellow Voat members who have told you time and again to focus on more important matters. Therefore, you must suffer the consequences, which are not all that harsh really. The consequences of blindsiding Jones at the drop of a hat merely consists of having your posts answered in a way you do not appreciate. If you cannot deal with the consequences, you need to stop the blindsides. It’s very simple.

My reciprocations will cease when you step back to a more reasonable posture on Jones, as you did those first few days after our last exchange in the thread noted earlier. Unlike you, I am an extraordinarily reasonable person who plays fair, and I am perfectly capable of distinguishing fair play from malice. Rest assured, I have no intention of responding to any of your posts just because you reference Jones in a journalistic way as you did in the thread noted previously. Bear in mind, when I respond to you, I am not speaking just for myself but also on behalf of @pizzagatebot @jem777 @newworldahead @unicornsandsparkles @YingYangMom @druhill007 @NotHereForPizza and a host of other Voat members who wants arrests, not the drama of endless distractions by evoking Alex Jones as a punching bag.