sensitive

Have to delete per rule 3: LINK posts (VIDEO, IMAGE, ARTICLE, etc.) all need to include an accurate description of the actual content. If you can't provide an accurate summary in the title of a Link post then you must submit it as a Discussion post where you provide the link with a brief description of the content.

remedy4reality

fucking retarded and arbitrary / that standard should be applied to multiple posts littering PG right now, and it's not.

This is why mods here have lost all credibility.

Nana66

A lot of people have probably given up....I get those people who flip out and post a bunch of pissed off posts. I think about it when I'm angry too but know there's no point and don't want my account banned.

sensitive

Then repost with a discuss post with a comprehensive description of the content, please.

And feel free to point out posts that violate the rules but were not yet deleted. Peace.

remedy4reality

it's not my post... as for the other posts not satisfying rule 3... THAT IS YOUR JOB

sensitive

it's not my post

Yep, my bad. Can happen when you have your hands full modding. BTW, this recent sticky might interest you. We are all humans, just like you, and we care about the cause, just like you:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1785466

remedy4reality

your passive aggressive and demeaning tone are not appreciated. actions from mods have contributed to mistrust and frustration that has had a negative impact on the overall investigation. Own it.

sensitive

Neither was I passive-aggressive nor was this my intention. Quite the contrary. If you chose to interpret something else into my replies, so be it.

PizzagateBot

Hi! I created the following archive link(s) for this voat submission:

OriginLink ArchiveOrg ArchiveIS ScreenCap WARCLinkSHA256
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1824032 archive.org link archive.is link screen cap 5103cc0d651b2379a2167f66bfabf558fa71667dea2433c744e8335d902d151b
http://archive.is/Fka1u archive.org link Archive.is Refused Archive screen cap N/A

WARC files are created with https://webrecorder.io/
WARCs can be viewed offline with WARC replay tools like https://github.com/webrecorder/webrecorderplayer-electron
Final WARC will be created after 1 week from posting.

Bot117

I think you may be right. i have watched them delete some really good information

Nana66

If this was my sub I wouldn't have way way more mods (they recently dumped like half and still a lot) than any other sub, who's only job is to look for excuses to delete content. I'd be finding ways to preserve anything that might in the slightest way be important....and when people post ideas and discussion posts I wouldn't make rules against them...also if possible and I'm pretty sure it is, I would remove the link post so people would only have the discuss link and ask them to include descriptions of what is in the links they paste. That's censorship free. There excuse when I inquired about the censorship was that all subs can make up their own rules.

UnicornsAndSparkles

Unfortunately people have tried creating other subs /v/pizzagatejournalism but they don't get much traffic. It seems to me very silly to delete thoughts, ideas and questions that very much are relevant to this investigation. It is done under the reasoning of some that it stops old, relevant, threads being buried - something in my opinion happened long long ago.

There is no archiving on here and evidence isn't being sorted and organised. Again, people have put lots of effort in and tried but there is no traffic to them.

As I have mentioned in other posts Pizzagate wiki is missing much vital, new and relevant information.

Think it is safe to say the deletion of the search bar was to try and put the brakes on this investigation. I know for me personally there are huge numbers of articles I can no longer find (I have only recently discovered the SAVE button. Sigh.). The suggested search site gives little to no results for PG searches and the T&C at the bottom of the page give me a sick feeling in my stomach.

We have masses of evidence and I think a collaborative effort needs to be made to piece it all together somewhere for a non red pilled, user friendly, audience. A better indexed wiki comes to mind. But I'm utter gash with technology. I used to be good with HTML. I think I'm past this!

VoatSearch

Hi, I run searchvoat.co and it worries me to hear you're not finding the results you're looking for, and even more that the (kinda non-existent) T&C upsets you. I'd really like to hear about missing search results (there really shouldn't be any , so far as I am aware).

As for the T&C, well I'm just lazy I guess and didn't want to spend money on a proper lawyer to draw up a proper policy in the early days. I can see that could be an issue now that the site is getting more traffic. Meanwhile all I can do is "promise" that nothing shady is happening there. Personally I have little interest in pizzagate, my focus is programming. Let me know if I can answer any questions.

truthdemon

some kind of mind mapping website would be helpful...the voat is controlled and not organised.. i placed a post saying that pizzagate is likely childsnuff gate ...and that is why there is a major push towards the lesser taboo of pedogate.. the admins removed that post within minutes ..but u can use this habit of admins to figure out what they dont want to come out i think pizzagate should be called childsnuff gate or atleast coupled with it . and moved to a mind mapping web forum one can use that forum togather with voat censor to rank info ...the more voat admin removes a topic the more releveant it would be ranked on the mind mapp