I would hope that skepticism would wane with thinking of the body language thing, whether it's an entirely 'accurate' analysis or not, as just one of the o so many components that culminate with one's overall ability to understand how guilt can be concluded. Besides, what you refer to as 'mannerisms', I would refer to as 'resembling an ugly inbred chihuahua like side effects'!!lol!!!

Truthfinding? Bombard? The body language "expert" where her every analysis matches with her political views? Okeydoke.

I want to believe that there are body language experts out there but somehow I can't buy it hook line and sinker. There are too many variables that impact what is a very subjective art and not a science. Speaking in front of cameras is really a tough thing to do even more so regarding an emotion laden topic. What if Alefantis is innocent when it comes to running a pedo ring but he himself has engaged in pedo sex. How do you project innocence on one topic when there is guilt on a related unspoken topic. Podesta is such a weird duck that his peculiar mannerisms would probably shine through no matter what topic he discussed. I appreciate your effort in bringing this to our attention but I remain skeptical.

Tails up - tails down
Winners v losers
Stock rising or stock falling