WikiLeaks Offers to Hire James Comey After Trump Fired Him! ( pizzagate )

submitted by srayzie

Wow! Do you guys think this would be good or bad? That would be crazy if he turned on everyone in Washington. This is gonna get interesting.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/862073819300810753 http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/james-comey-fired-wikileaks-offers-to-hire-new-job-assange-dc-office-trump/

This is relevant to pedogate because Comey knows what is in those emails.

srayzie

I've heard things like that. I'm going to read them. Thank you.

pbvrocks

Bahahahaha...Assange has a really dry sense of humor..toungue firmly in cheek I am sure...

Votescam

I think there may even now be a price on Comey's head .... !!!

jmac1112

OK, I have resisted signing up for a long time, but I really need to say a couple things here.

Some of us will recall when Assange tweeted about troops showing up at the embassy he was at, and his subsequent disappearance. This occurred in response to him tweeting that he was about to release information that was going to get Hillary Clinton arrested, right after Hillary asked congress for permission to drone strike him. This event led to rumors of his death for a long time, as the world was asking for proof of life, but none was ever offered. After a very very long time, word came out that he had been detained for the purpose of going to trial over the "rape" charges, yet this supposed trial never actually took place, and after a while there were some news articles trying to establish that he had been proven still alive, even though the evidence was somewhat questionable.

I noticed on Wikileaks' Twitter around the same time, and in the news, all sorts of publicity about Wikileaks and how it was some ultra-reliable news source, and encouraging people to listen to Wikileaks only. Then, instead of releasing this damning Hillary info that was supposed to be released immediately, we got a bunch of leaks that had nothing to do with PG or Hillary at all. I remember a couple cases where the info coming out from Wikileaks seemed to be slyly supporting the left's arguments, even though JA was totally anti-Hillary and pro-Trump. JA has never been properly proven alive, and the lack of proof of life when it was asked for, and the subsequent explanation (about his trial) which also seems false now, seems to indicate that JA was in fact killed, and that Wikileaks is now under the control of the opposition.

Then let us consider this big thing about "#vault7", a bunch of irrelevant links about the CIA from a long time ago, but nothing that everyone was waiting for. Lots of hoopla about that, but zero substance.

This is the real reason why Trump said he wanted JA to stand trial. It is because he knows JA can never be produced to stand trial! The left killed him and took over his Twitter a long time ago.

What probably happened is, JA was kidnapped and tortured to reveal his dead man's switch. He soon gave up Gavin McFayden as the dead man's switch, so they killed McFayden a couple days later. There being no way to release JA safely, they definitely killed him, and then set about making up fake evidence to dispel the already-widespread rumors of his death.

Then you've got JA supposedly offering to hire James Comey (the same guy who failed to investigate all the Wikileaks-leaked emails)?! You guys really think JA wants to hire Comey to investigate the government, when he has failed to do so for years? Don't be naiive! Read what JA actually tweeted. You think this was meant as a joke? Seems pretty cut and dry to me. Imagine you didn't know about all this PG stuff, and ask yourself how you would read that post. This is what was said, exactly:

"WikiLeaks would be happy to consider hiring James Comey to help lead its DC office should he like to properly investigate the US government."

When Wikileaks and JA start saying things that go against what you know they believe, right after widespread (and plausible) rumors of JA's death and Wikileaks being taken over, you have to at least "suspect" that maybe JA really is dead.

Rest in Peace, Julian.

Whattheheck321

I go back and forth on this. Agree with so much of what you wrote, but hope you are wrong. I wish he'd come out and prove it if he is ok.

Pokes

You hit the nail on the head. Have been saying this myself. They grabbed Assange in October and have not offered proof of life since. People voted for show up in the window, and to this day he still has not appeared. No PGP protection anymore, no relevant leaks, no reason not to assume the worst.

cantsleepawink

I'm with you on this. The tone of the Wikileaks account changed significantly after the reporting of troops showing up. As for the whole Pamela Anderson is the 'new girlfriend' thing...I don't believe a word of that. Healthy scepticism.

srayzie

From the interviews I've seen since the death scare, I believe it's really him. His voice and mannerisms too. What really convinced me was his interview with Sean Hannity. Hannity is one of only a few I trust. I don't think he would lie about that. Having said that, I do question some of the stuff going on with him. Like, has he been seen by others recently? What happened to his cat that was always in the window? Is it true Pamela Anderson goes there? There is a lot of mystery surrounding him. But, I do think he's alive. Besides, if it's not really Wikileaks, why release CIA secrets? That would damage our security.

jmac1112

The thing that was most amazing about that interview was that neither Assange or Hannity mentioned the troops showing up at the embassy or the rumors of JA's death, even though that was what was had been in the news about him recently. Another interesting thing about that interview is the fact that nothing that was spoken about can confirm when the interview actually took place. The conversation might well have occurred earlier, but they may simply have not used the footage right away. Transcript here: http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/09/07/sean_hannity_hosts_compliments_julian_assange_on_fox_news.html

bopper

He did a recent interview w/ Ron Paul, Zero Hedge carried the story, I can't imagine it was faked. They talk about current events, and it's the same old Julian. My money is on he's alive.

Votescam

First, believe the Assange comment re hiring Comey was a JOKE.

Second, the accusations of rape are baseless and in fact the women are saying that they were pressured by police to bring charges against Assange which they didn't want to do.

Pretty much your summation is that Julian Assange may very well be dead and that this whole matter of Biden trip to London and what looked like an attack at the Embassy with some witnesses saying that Assange was taken out with a bag over his head may very well be true. We really don't know. And we need to continue to remind ourselves of that fact.

Assange's comments -- if they were his -- have to be a JOKE because I presume that Comey won't be left out there on the streets to spill his guts -- and unlikely that he could offer enough assurances to those concerned whose secrets he holds that they don't have to worry about his talking.

jmac1112

There are a lot of people going to Wikileaks these days who don't know anything but what the MSM has told them, and all of those people are going to view the Twitter comment and take it to mean that Wikileaks supports Comey. Is it normal for Wikileaks to plainly say one thing, but mean something completely different? In my experience that is unusual for them. Nobody could type that message and not know that it would be taken that way. Every single media article that has come out has flat out said that Wikileaks offered him a job:

http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/james-comey-fired-wikileaks-offers-to-hire-new-job-assange-dc-office-trump/ http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/09/wikileaks-offers-comey-a-new-job/ http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/hah-wikileaks-offers-hire-james-comey-firing/

Votescam

Is it normal for Wikileaks to plainly say one thing, but mean something completely different?

When it's a joke, it would be very likely. (Satire)

srayzie

That's what has happened to me! All this darkness has made me go towards the light. I've changed in so many ways. I think it's definitely the end times. People better get right with God.

TrishaUK

1.) If Wikileaks ever hired James Comey it would be the first time, Wikileaks potentially releases fake news (if it came via Comey hahaha) - 2.) This could turn into the Deep State plot to get closer to Julian Assange and kill him. -
3.) This 'Offer' is just mocking James Comey.

Saibra

It was sarcasm

ArthurEdens

Wikileaks is the real fbi

srayzie

Crazy. Things like that was happening to the other lady there too!

Buttfuckmebigfoot

I read that as James Alefantis for some reason...

I'm not a smart man

bopper

I do that all the time!

srayzie

lol. I do too when people use the initial JA

rooting4redpillers

Nah... we've been reminded plenty of times here, not to use JA when referring to James Alefantis or Julian Assange, for that very reason. Also, because using initials doesn't work well in a search. But people still do it anyway. So... you aren't as "not smart" as you might think.

MitchTheBridge

Nice sarcasm.

rooting4redpillers

First thought, that's just too great, and Hillary, Podesta, Huma, Carlos Danger... are in double-secret-emergency conference as we speak. I might think about this differently later, but for now, LOL, A+ Julian!

Laskar

Podesta is Tweeting boldly, acting as if Comey's firing is going to bring down Trump's presidency:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1850195

@rootingforredpillers have an upvote.

rooting4redpillers

Every leftist loon on the internet is comparing this to Watergate. That's not Podesta tweeting boldly, it's some "Team Brock" flunky, "boldly" following the playbook and collecting a check. Trouble for them is... WE KNOW IT. What I don't know, is why they continue to expose the Podesta name to the brutality of Twitter. That still just beats the hell out of me. Thanks for the upvoat, have one back.

carmencita

I think it is a tongue and cheek offer. If they don't scramble his brains then they will kill him for accepting that job. Maybe a heart attack soon, with a suicide note? He just couldn't take it.

bopper

I read it as sarcasm. If that's what it is, it's funny. Dry humor :)

srayzie

Do you think? I thought maybe too. Bit, he said this right after...

"FBI source says the FBI will now start leaking leaking like Niagara. But please FBI friends full docs or you know the press will spin it!" https://mobile.twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/862075341644468224

"Mr. Comey knows where many bodies are buried. Working for WikiLeaks is fulfilling. James--don't become another lobbyist for Glock or Donkin. https://mobile.twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/862106832223031296

Doesn't that seem like he's serious? Or maybe half joking hoping for a bite? Or hinting at him to leak some docs?

bopper

I have seen people reading it different ways so I don't know. That second tweet there is pretty interesting. (The first one did appear sarcastic.) Alex Jones says he has some news from his "sources" ... @ 11AM today he'll talk about it. Assange is def in anticipation of important (and full) FBI docs now.

srayzie

I'll be watching Alex Jones. I hope this gets good

bopper

Keep us posted! Alex may actually have something good :)

srayzie

I know! I've been following. I wouldn't dare post with all that going on. Is Redberry really missing?

srayzie

Me too!

srayzie

I just posted the twitter link