SCOTUS Scalia - murdered by underage victim ( pizzagate )

submitted by CompletelySickOFit

http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/03/judge-scalys-sordid-demise-scalia-liked.html

I can't remember if this was already a thread on Voat, but the Podesta tweet about Saturday Night Massacre brought this to my memory. I read that SCOTUS Antonin Scalia was not assasinated and did not die of natural causes, but was rather murdered by one of the underage boys he was raping at that private ranch in Texas. Throat was slit - so that's why no autopsy done. Here is the link and its a really interesting read. Not 100% sure if it's true or not, but it is pizzagate related because it ties into the Elite in high power government positions raping kids and covering it up at the highest levels. Its a good read.... but I cant remember if it's already been posted here or not. Again, this was brought up in my memory because of the Podesta tweet today that some were connecting to Scalia's death and Hillary Clinton wanting him dead....

http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/03/judge-scalys-sordid-demise-scalia-liked.html

Vindicator

@CompletelySickOFit , I am flairing this "Accuracy In Question" because there was no evidence supporting your thesis in either your post, or the article you linked to.

CompletelySickOFit

I have no idea if it is accurate. This is something I read and posted to let others make their own conclusion. I was not there and have no idea if it's true or not. But I think it is logical and explains a lot of the questions I have about there not being an autopsy or investigation. This is a hard topic/story to prove accuracy on, but I will try to do better.

Vindicator

Thanks. Please ping me if any solid evidence does turn up and I will remove or change the flair. This is our process.

EyeOfHorus

This is what happens when .gov covers up a muder. We may never know what transpired, but we know without a doubt he didn't die of natural causes.

Are_we__sure

How is that without a doubt? He was elderly, overweight, a smoker, had heart and lung issues.

If this is without a doubt, you have a strange sense of doubt. Or you only apply your sense of doubt in certain cases.

EyeOfHorus

If there were no foul play then they wouldn't have gone to such extremes. Try reading up on it. Or, remain a sheep. The government loves sheep.

Are_we__sure

What extremes are you talking about?

EyeOfHorus

What?

fogdryer

Make a list Who was Scalia. ( conservative) pedo etc Who would benefit from his death

Take the two scenarios and compare them.

IWear the hat as they say.
Weigh all the evidence discuss it.....,

If something is missing------ go find it Research etc

Commoner

I believe some people made a connection between a Podesta email about making a film and Scalia's death. http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/scalia-death-linked-podesta-email/

kazza64

from what i've read scalia was a satanic paedophile who was eliminated to shut him up

https://davidshurter.com/?p=6037

pby1000

Yes, David Shurter did a video on his theory about what happened. It is very interesting.

kazza64

Scalia’s death was suspicious is putting it mildly. 

No autopsy
No medical examiner on site to decipher cause of death
No U.S. Marshal protection detail accompanying Scalia
No functioning CCTV cameras on day of death
Scalia found clothed on bed with pillow over face
Scalia’s body mysteriously cremated before it could be examined
Resort owner large Obama contributor
And the list goes on and on

http://truepundit.com/podesta-emailed-about-an-assassination-three-days-before-supreme-court-justice-scalias-suspicious-death/

pby1000

He needs to be dug up and given an autopsy. I wonder if they will find that his throat was slit.

Pizzalawyer

How do you dig someone up who was cremated?

pby1000

Was he cremated? I thought he was buried. Lol. Catholics do cremation?

Delorean77

dig up a cremated body?.... Is that a thing?

pby1000

I assumed he was buried because he was Catholic....

kazza64

yes .... i mean he could have just died of a heart attack while he was being smothered with a pillow and they threw in the minor cutting his throat as a red herring

pby1000

That probably gave him quite the boner... The sick fuck.

kazza64

there was a lot of evidence of satanic worship at the ranch he died at

pby1000

I don't doubt it. A year ago I would have said you are crazy, but now I believe it to be true.

Are_we__sure

No autopsy No medical examiner on site to decipher cause of death

Neither of these things make a death suspicious. Both are fairly common. Particularly when someone in poor health dies in their sleep and there is no sign of foul play.

No U.S. Marshal protection detail accompanying Scalia

This was fairly common for Justices. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/us/supreme-court-justices-remain-security-exceptions.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/do-supreme-court-justices-need-more-protection/

Scalia found clothed on bed with pillow over face

I assume he was in pyjamas, but the pillow was not over his face. It was above his head....on the bed between his head and the headboard. Reporters double checked this after the initial reports, it was just a miscommunication. There were no signs of foul play.

Scalia’s body mysteriously cremated before it could be examined

Nothing mysterious about this. This was the family's wishes. There was nothing mysterious about his death. He was 79 years old. He was in poor health. He smoked, was overweight, had several heart issues, suffered from sleep apnea. He was in such poor health that his doctor recommended he not undergo shoulder surgery, because the surgery might kill him. His doctor was consulted.

The email is too stupid to be considered.

Saibra

Yeah I know for a fact Supreme Court Justices have no security detail. When I worked in the automotive industry, Justice Kennedy would bring his car in himself for repairs. No body guards, interns or even a secretary. He was a regular guy. I didn't realize who he was until after he left and I had to call his office for authorization for repairs. I was kind-of shocked. He's a good guy. I may not agree with some of his rulings, but he seemed like an ordinary citizen.

CompletelySickOFit

That is absolutely not true..... it's possible that Jusices do not have security when they are in Washington or their hometown taking car for repairs, but if Justices travel, they absolutely have protection from the Marshall Service and local law enforcement.

SOURCES FOR YOU TOO - NY Times - http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/us/supreme-court-justices-remain-security-exceptions.html

Court officials do not discuss security arrangements in detail, but according to longtime observers and Congressional budget requests, they vary depending on a justice’s location: traveling out of town for a speech, walking around Washington or working inside the heavily fortified court building. In the capital, the justices are protected mainly by the court’s own small force, said a spokeswoman, Kathy Arberg. When the justices leave Washington, the United States Marshals Service takes over, and local police departments help, too.

What happened was that Scalia either ditched his security detail or he told them specifically not to accompany him... But he absolutely had protection.

Saibra

Ok, you are quoting the NY times, I know Justice Kennedy and have dealt with him for years. He doesn't have security detail. I'll take my word over that rag any day. Thanks.

Commoner

Don't forget the tie-in to one of Podesta's email talking about plans for "making a film", which many believe was a coded message for carrying out the murder of Scalia http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/scalia-death-linked-podesta-email/

kazza64

yes .... and the wet works reference

2impendingdoom

there was also the VeteransToday.com claim that the Scalia was killed by his hunting cronies who were afraid that they would all be exposed by association via Obama's blackmail material who was trying to force a specific court decision, so they could have gotten the boy to do it.

DarkMath

Yeah this was posted a while ago. I don't know who to believe. It looks like hear-say and there's no hard evidence. I believe David Shurter is definitely a victim and his story is tragic. My heart goes out to the guy but there's just not much to go on.

CompletelySickOFit

Sorry, I was not sure if it was this site or not. Definitely no hard evidence, but hard evidence is pretty hard to find with Scalia since it happened in private. The truth may never be known for sure.

equineluvr

"Not 100% sure if it's true or not,"

It is a RUMOR that has been going around. Abel Danger is a DISINFO OUTFIT.

CompletelySickOFit

This seems to be a very strange disinfo story about Scalia. Why wouldn't they make up a different story?

Littleredcorvette

abeldanger comes up in wikileaks https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/12/1261993_-analytical-and-intelligence-comments-norway-lessons-from-a.html

2011-07-29 John R. Prukop, CCW COALITION & ABELDANGER.NET PR/LEGAL sent a message using the contact form at https://www.stratfor.com/contact .

Your recent Security Weekly written by Scott Stewart concerning Norway's purported "Lone Wolf Attacker" is completely full of holes. First off, the pictures of the crime scene that ANY average forensic investigator with a modicum of common sense could tell you did not happen the way the media or Stratfor is telling its audience. All of the windows of the buildings are BLOWN OUTWARD and the debris field is in the street. That means whatever explosions occurred had to be from WITHIN the building. Oh, there might have been a fertilizer distraction device, but there's no way that 2,100 lbs of amonium nitrate could've caused the kind of damage to those buildings. Your "story" is but an endorsement of the lone-nut theory that was promoted in the Oklahoma City Bombings. While there may have been a Rental Ryder truck with a fertilizer bomb inside, that did not cause multiple floors to collapse within the Alfred P. Murrah building. Moreover, the main portion of the damage to the Murrah building was located the FARTHEST away from the purported location of the Ryder truck.

Do you folks exist to contain the lie and promote the government/media propaganda about this Norway incident, as well as others, or do you exist to actally investigate and get to the bottom of the infamous five W's: WHO, WHAT, WHY, WHEN and WHERE? So far from what we've seen in Stratfor's alerts, it's just more media nonsense.