@iamcuriousjew : Second reminder to review the submission guidelines for v/pizzagate research posts. Removing per Rules 2 and 3. To post here, you have to have to link to support for major claims, that we can vet, not just some anonymous YouTube video.

Mods get this bullshit off of here!

i doubt he was gonna prosecute anyone for anything, he was just there as a gatekeeper and for the big paycheck, same reason all of them are there, if you wanted to have a functional system, you would never put a single guy in charge of anything

robert, when things are true you dont usually have to spam them. I take you aren't very familiar with truth and how it works. you can't force others to accept YOUR truth and they won't unless it is a UNIVERSAL truth.... you just let it out and it takes flight.

Comey and the FBI cannot indict. The FBI is analogous to a police department. It gathers the evidence and turns the matter over to the Dept. of Justice which has the final say so as to which cases to pursue. Think of the DOJ as your local prosecutor receiving the cases from the police dept. When Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton, Comey took it upon himself to exercise prosecutorial discretion that was not his to exercise. Perhaps he was justified inasmuch as Lynch had compromised herself to the degree that a Bar complaint should have been filed and her license suspended. She should have been fired on the spot by Obama but fat chance that. Separate story. Anyway, Comey announces in effect what his recommendation would have been on Hillary's email investigation had he been able to under normal channels. Whatever his recommendation, under normal circumstances Lynch could have followed or rejected his recommendation. Not that she wanted to prosecute Hillary. So now we have Comey compromised as well. Hillary gets a free pass once again.

As to Epstein, rumor has it that Epsteins dream team went fullbore defense by digging up dirt on virtually every one connected to the case and a settlement agreement was reached that swept so many matters and perps under the rug the likes of which has never been seen in American jurisprudence. This resolution was conceived no doubt by the wily potential co- defendant Law Professor Dershowitz of Harvard (who by his own admission made the acquaintance of Epstein via Lady Rothschild btw). So the agreement is unenforceable under public policy but who is going to challenge it? Especially when amends are being made to the young ladies in civil court.

At first blush it was hoped that Acosta would be compelled to reveal the Epstein shenanigans when he was being questioned for his position in Trumps cabinet. But it didn't happen. Was Trumps selection of Acosta a reward for caving in on Epstein? An insurance policy that if questioned,would guarantee that a plausible explanation would be given? Who knows. These folks protect one another, that's politics. Thats all there is folks.

We can only hope that Sessions reopens the Hillary email investigation. And we can hope that the emails on Weiners lap top reveals fresh evidence re Epstein cohorts but I'm betting nothing happens. Inertia is a very powerful force.

Everybody's clairvoyant nowadays. I need to get me a youtube channel.

Comey was a good guy?

Shut the fuck up you piece of shit shill.

Take your Deep State pay check and shove it up your ass.

:-D