The Manhattan project was during ww2, to create an atom bomb. The Tesla death ray is supposedly what happened in Tunguska. They said it was a meteor. Tesla was testing the weapon and did that by accident. If he said what he said about Tunguska back in 93-94, he pretty much knew about it before everyone else.
I believe assange is working for the CIA. both him and comey were essential in getting trump elected to the white house. and if im not mistaken, didn't assange brush off the pizza gate thing? I think snowden and assange are both controlled opposition and i doubt assange is going to try and expose pedo related stuff. just my own personal feelings. i suspect trump is a pedo too. hes been to the island as well.
Not entirely true, although I'll concede they are rare. Kevin Shipp and Ray McGovern are two ex-CIA agents who have done their best to inform the public about what's going on behind the veil. Scott Bennett is another very interesting whistleblower. Although he was an Army Special Ops. Officer and Psych. Warfare Analyst, his story involves CIA, Clinton foundation, etc. He tells a
very
interesting story. You might want to watch a few interviews of these brave gentlemen.
To be honest, I could care less about up or down votes, but I do have a message for the person who downvoted my comment. There's something wrong with your thinking. There is nothing in my post except interesting information about a couple of former CIA agents trying to make a difference in a good way, and you must be awful insecure to bother to downvote. If you're brave enough, post your username, because I'm curious.
I heard him say before that the people in power are more likely to negotiate and come clean if there is a "truth and reconciliation" trial. It makes sense since we are dealing with people who own over half the world's wealth.
The alternative is a full on Revolution, which could get messy very fast.
My personal feeling is that we are dealing with people who will not do the right thing unless a blade is against their neck.
Which option do you prefer? Maybe you see another option I did not mention here.
"I heard him say before that the people in power are more likely to negotiate and come clean if there is a "truth and reconciliation" trial. It makes sense since we are dealing with people who own over half the world's wealth."
They are in control, so why the hell would they come clean?
"My personal feeling is that we are dealing with people who will not do the right thing unless a blade is against their neck."
Why would they come clean? Because, if they do not, then they run the risk of facing the guillotine. The weakness of the people in power is that they pay others to do work for them. They cannot and will not do work themselves. If there is nobody willing to accept their pay, then they are completely fucked. We would just need to take away their support structure and isolate them. Of course, I have heard that they have nukes planted all over the place, so it could get very ugly.
I am not saying you are wrong. I am just pointing out another way of dealing with this.
Of course, I believe that the type of people we are dealing with only respond to force, so...
My worry is that we will make the same mistake as Hitler-we will not get the people at the very, very top. This must be done or the problem will only go away temporarily until people forget again after a few generations.
It sounds like you want to forget negotiating and just go for it. Count me in. I have a lot to lose, and so does everyone else, but we cannot condemn future generations by not dealing with this now.
▼ SayWhatNOWAY
Get this fakenews bullshit off of here! Steele is a freaking Soros paid loser!
▼ jstrotha0975
Okay, thank you.
▼ jstrotha0975
Philadelphia Experiment. Did he mention anything about Camp Hero or Montauk?
▼ jstrotha0975
The Manhattan project was during ww2, to create an atom bomb. The Tesla death ray is supposedly what happened in Tunguska. They said it was a meteor. Tesla was testing the weapon and did that by accident. If he said what he said about Tunguska back in 93-94, he pretty much knew about it before everyone else.
▼ jstrotha0975
Can you tell me more about this?
▼ strangerthanF1iction
I believe assange is working for the CIA. both him and comey were essential in getting trump elected to the white house. and if im not mistaken, didn't assange brush off the pizza gate thing? I think snowden and assange are both controlled opposition and i doubt assange is going to try and expose pedo related stuff. just my own personal feelings. i suspect trump is a pedo too. hes been to the island as well.
▼ Intheknow
Doesnt matter rep. or dem. If youre a pedofile its all the same. Evil..
▼ Thesheeplfollowuhome
I listened to Steele talk for a few minutes. Won't waste a single one more.
▼ pby1000
I am not sure why you feel that way. The reform act is the way to go, and he has been saying that for a long time.
Why do you feel he is a waste of your time?
▼ Azagthoth
Theres no such thing as ex-cia
▼ rwb2
Not entirely true, although I'll concede they are rare. Kevin Shipp and Ray McGovern are two ex-CIA agents who have done their best to inform the public about what's going on behind the veil. Scott Bennett is another very interesting whistleblower. Although he was an Army Special Ops. Officer and Psych. Warfare Analyst, his story involves CIA, Clinton foundation, etc. He tells a very interesting story. You might want to watch a few interviews of these brave gentlemen.
▼ rwb2
To be honest, I could care less about up or down votes, but I do have a message for the person who downvoted my comment. There's something wrong with your thinking. There is nothing in my post except interesting information about a couple of former CIA agents trying to make a difference in a good way, and you must be awful insecure to bother to downvote. If you're brave enough, post your username, because I'm curious.
▼ equineluvr
Steele is a disinfo agent who espouses alien bullcrap and says that pedos should NOT receive jail time.
▼ pby1000
I heard him say before that the people in power are more likely to negotiate and come clean if there is a "truth and reconciliation" trial. It makes sense since we are dealing with people who own over half the world's wealth.
The alternative is a full on Revolution, which could get messy very fast.
My personal feeling is that we are dealing with people who will not do the right thing unless a blade is against their neck.
Which option do you prefer? Maybe you see another option I did not mention here.
▼ equineluvr
"I heard him say before that the people in power are more likely to negotiate and come clean if there is a "truth and reconciliation" trial. It makes sense since we are dealing with people who own over half the world's wealth."
They are in control, so why the hell would they come clean?
"My personal feeling is that we are dealing with people who will not do the right thing unless a blade is against their neck."
So you agree with me.
▼ pby1000
Why would they come clean? Because, if they do not, then they run the risk of facing the guillotine. The weakness of the people in power is that they pay others to do work for them. They cannot and will not do work themselves. If there is nobody willing to accept their pay, then they are completely fucked. We would just need to take away their support structure and isolate them. Of course, I have heard that they have nukes planted all over the place, so it could get very ugly.
I am not saying you are wrong. I am just pointing out another way of dealing with this.
Of course, I believe that the type of people we are dealing with only respond to force, so...
My worry is that we will make the same mistake as Hitler-we will not get the people at the very, very top. This must be done or the problem will only go away temporarily until people forget again after a few generations.
It sounds like you want to forget negotiating and just go for it. Count me in. I have a lot to lose, and so does everyone else, but we cannot condemn future generations by not dealing with this now.