darkknight111

Seems Shareblue (which appears to be the army of shills) is led by David Brock. That name pops up EVERYWHERE with the left's political attack machine.

Lunger

The people at Media Matters don't care about any dirt that is "dug up". They know that no one in the press will run with it, or it will just be swept under the rug with lies and declared 'debunked'.

cantsleepawink

searchvoat.co is your friend. We already have pages of posts on Media Matters. We've moved on considerably from the 'let's investigate the DNC' days. I'm concerned that we are becoming politicised here...that would be a few steps backwards.

Peruse to your heart's content: https://searchvoat.co/index.php?t=%22media+matters%22&s=pizzagate&nsfw=off

YingYangMom

I posted about this on a previous thread : https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1882387/9241821

http://archive.is/bZhK3 ( ALL CONSPIRACIES GREAT AND SMALL 2011 )

"In an effort to explain why the jury in the Kenny Gladney trial took less than the time it takes to watch an episode Law & Order: Special Victims Unit to return with a verdict of GTFO, Andrew Breitbart’s crack team of trained bonobos have been working day and night and even through their naptimes to explain what malignant force in the universe has the power to not only corrupt our system of justice but also to defy the laws of time and space and physics and no rights turns on a red.

Who could these space monsters be?

"Media Matters for America."

"Yes, when SEIU doesn’t get what they want by unleashing their purple-clad beserkers on unsuspecting Real Americans, SEIU turns to DAVID'S BROCK Media X-Men to do the behind the scenes “BLACK OPS” work. No, really:

It’s no surprise that the tax-exempt Media Matters regularly features publishes proven-false propaganda pieces as “news,” and it’s no surprise that the site, led by Eric Boehlert, came out hard to spin and defend on behalf of SEIU. What Media Matters and Eric Boehlert have not disclosed is that they were paid by SEIU for UNKNOWN services and it begs the question of whether or not they were paid to help cover up SEIU’s mess in the Gladney incident.

Something to think about.

Posted by @Votescam in response to my comment:

Info about the Kenny Gladney case and verdict - - https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2011/07/13/the-kenneth-gladney-charade-collapses/181483 both sides ... http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2011/08/04/blood-money-how-seiu-and-media-matters-stole-justice-from-kenneth-gladney-2/

LostandFound

Media matters 501c3 status has been under threat for many years, if they lost it they would be liable for back tax on all earnings since they opened, needless to say even with deep pockets it would end them overnight. Simply google "media matters losing their 501c3 status" the articles are too numerous and speculative to list.

Thats their weak point, hit em and hit em hard.

LostandFound

JP helped setup Media Matters, founded by David Brock, and made the resources of CAP available to David Brock.

Side note - HRC was an early adviser to MM and Soros was a large sponsor.

Speculative side note - TP knew JA 2004 and JP knew DB in 2004, I would bet thats how they got together through the Podestas.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1478825 & https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1504312

Vindicator

@ElusivePoster : I see no evidence of doxing in this post, just plenty of free speech.

cantsleepawink

I thought the moderators had packed up and gone home :)

Womb_Raider

How vindicating.

sinclair

It's not called dox when they are public figures. It's paparazzi. They are actors that want to be famous.

Candygram_for_Mongo

James Alefantis and David Brock are homosexual deviants. Child fuckers both of them, that's how they practice religion to Satan.

PepeFarmRemembers

alt-sexuals?

Silex

Hetero here. Humans aren't the only species having gay behavior. Many others have sex with same sex partners for different reasons in nature. I understand what you are saying is related to religious (Christianity?) traditionalism, but I'm not sure that putting homosexuality in the same corner as pedophilia will get us anywhere. Pedophilia/Luciferianism is the real problem, regardless of faiths. And as far as human beings go, they don't choose their true preference(s), regardless of all the left BS and other Bill Nyegans.

Verite1

thank you!

Candygram_for_Mongo

Humans are the only species with a concise. Non-humans don't prefer or seek out same-sex relations. The animal world instances are propaganda not truth. Hetero here as well but I don't care if you are gay, choose whatever path is yours. I just don't want my kids taught that it is perfectly normal. The vast majority of pedophile cases involves same-sex is what I've learned from others who were abused. Deviancy is homosexuality, it is not natural, it does not sustain life, it is purely for pleasure if you justify it. Love is not love despite the lefts view on matters. Love is not love when you penetrate a child. It's rape.

Silex

No. I have to bring distinctions in what you are saying.. Homosexuality is natural. But the fact that LGTBQ-whatever else is pushed strongly in the media is a major cause for concern. There is a grey area between promoting the acceptance of differences and pushing EVERYTHING (by religious standards considered sinful) toward a public acceptance. I agree that education and cultural conditionning is pushing strong narratives, therefore what is being put in those, from the elite media conglomerates, needs more scrutiny. Other than that, I'd say that because the brain is the first sex organ, it can be noted that gay behavior doesn't benefit life creation directly (DNA, duh) but why can't we aknowledge that pleasure is also part of life, instead of targeting consensual adult/adult sex life for pleasure? The pedophiles are deviant and sick, but it's not a matter of dampening down the importance of sexual pleasure for the rest of us.. That's a major problems for many faiths: sexual pleasure is automatical sin (because doesn't participate in life-making, therefore everything around sex is almost worthy of damnation. That said, I do see sex as sacred on different levels, chemically, energetically, psychologically, spiritually. #Freedom #Justice #CriticalThinking

Candygram_for_Mongo

On #CriticalThinking, we can agree to disagree. For thousands of years it was considered taboo. It wasn't just years of religion either. It is not natural. It was always meant to be the self sustaining relationship of just two opposite genders. The anus has but one purpose and one only. It is not a sex organ even though that's what it is today. It doesn't benefit life at all, only for pleasure. At least hetero sex leads to something many call wonderful, life. There is more to life than self gratification.

Verite1

So let me ask you… Are you saying that you believe people should have control over their attraction to whomever? That people with homosexual feelings engage in a lifestyle that is "deviant" and choose not to "oberserve the morally correct way of being and that "God" is making the distinction between correct and incorrect and sitting in judgment of young children who expressed an attraction one way or another? And you must also therefore believe that transgender people carelessly want to engage in A lifestyle that puts them at huge risk ostracizes them causes deep pain, suicide, the list goes on and on.....that they would CHOOSE voluntarily or might you consider that: A) Who you were attracted to is not the same thing as how you identify yourself B) humans are the only Species that consider it it binary terms. Mother Nature does not.

Candygram_for_Mongo

Disagree, we are miles apart on things. You are bringing up God, others cite religion, which you're obviously are biased against and which has nothing to do with the opposing the lifestyle. So I'll just exit this conversation.

Verite1

I'm not biased at all against "spirituality," tolerance, prayer, etc. so not sure what you mean. I'm also disappointed you feel the need to "exit," the conversation, as I wasn't attacking you. I am simply interested to have you expound on your views and hopefully we can try to understand one another better because I truly think this sex trafficking/pedophilia topic/problem is an area where ppl can come together, build bridges and strengthen society in order to better protect children. Sorry you don't feel comfortable discussing this. I don't fault ppl over their religious views. Live and let live so long as someone else's choices don't jeopardize anyone else. I guess that's where the gray area is. For some reason homosexuality and transgenderism which is prevalent in nature, throws human beings into a tizzy. I just wish people could separate the various identities and understand that one doesn't lead to the other and that it is not a "choice." I mean it is a choice in so far as if someone identifies a certain way and she chooses to ignore those deep-seated feelings and live inauthentically, versus recognizing their true nature and living life as such, yes that is a choice. But the attraction itself or the identitification itself in the case of being transgender is not a choice. It just is. Just as you either identify as a female or a male and it wouldn't occur to you to think otherwise and you would be attracted to a particular sex and cannot control that attraction. That is not a choice. Is this what you disagree with? Please help me understand. And vis a vis the issue of "God," I simply do not believe that God is a sentient, judgmental "person" who judges one way or the other. God is simply a conversation about energy and the consciousness which brings thought from the ethereal into the material world. It is the law of cause and effect, i.e. karma. It is expressed in mother nature which is bountiful expensive completely holistic and not binary. Can you please comment on this?

Candygram_for_Mongo

Sorry, my view of God differs from your view of God and is unsettling but I apologize for being offended.. Transgender "just is" not natural, not healthy, not what your biology says you are. It's a choice to live other than how you were born...because feelings. We can't do whatever we like in this life. That's how we have this growing pedo problem. Love is love has limits, a man's sexual love of a toddler for example. Homosexuality isn't prevalent in nature. It's purely a conscience issue. Citing animals is propaganda at its worst. There are only two genders no matter what Zuckerberg claims and adds to his Facebook. There is a reason there are only two genders, it called a life sustaining outcome.

We are miles apart. I am not going to attempt to persuade you, it is what it is. I'll let others live the life they want and worry about myself. Just don't force me to accept what I don't believe in.

Silex

That is why I underline that I also see sex as a sacred thing, but it doesn't exclude pleasure... Can't life be fun too, without falling into depravity?

Candygram_for_Mongo

There isn't anything wrong with pleasure. But if everybody chooses pleasure over reproduction (hetero and homo) then the species dies. The world is better off when pleasure is not the driving factor and creating a life that makes a difference here and now is more important. If you want to help others, you'll raise a doctor or the next chemist that discovers a cure for cancer. If you want to help yourself, pleasure is the final frontier in your life.

Silex

Totally agree!

Verite1

Pediphilia is depravity because it is not consensual. Homosexuality and transgenderism is not depravity because it is hormonal and it is part of mother nature. Just because some people are not interested in procreating or that is not their role on planet earth does not mean they are not innocent in God's eyes and part of Mother Nature.

Silex

Yep. The whole point of this is how human beings use theological/pseudo-scientific argumentation only to assert a «moral» high ground or to push a narrative that only can make them in control of others in the long run. #Eugenism #Elitism #Control

Verite1

Well it's widespread and very frustrating and frankly scary for ppl who are in this demographic. I can speak for these ppl definitively, that just because the identify as such (homosexual or trans) doesn't mean they IN ANY WAY, condone pedophilia EVEN IF it just coincidentally happens, there are unfortunately are indeed SOME ppl in this demographic who ARE attracted to minors. Pedos will be prevalent in all demographics including the homosexual and trans community. But I know many in this community who find pedophilia offensive and vile. Having said that, pedophiles IMHO are likewise not "evil" for having the attraction, but since children are innocent and can't "consent," we run in to a major problem. I guess this is where NAMBLA comes in to view. Because it seems they are trying to point out that if homosexuality is accepted as a "natural phenomenon," why isn't the attraction to minors also just "part of the spectrum?" This makes it so sticky!! I can see their point, but again....since children are involved, it's entirely necessary to make a clear distinction, right? And who on earth would ever think it is natural to have sex with a child or an infant!? But the narrative is so touchy because ultra conservative, orthodox Christian mentality point out homosexuality is not "natural" in the sense that it doesn't promote procreation and they are right. But, it's still a natural cinnamon on in nature that they somehow cannot understand and by not doing so I think it invalidates their arguments, but bringing up the normalization of pedophilia by NAMBLA gives them a very valid point for concern. So what to do?

Vox_Pacem

head over to /pol and ask. There's probably plenty of info among them

Aloha808

Crazy world we live in where a faggot who likes to get fucked in the ass and suck dick is taken seriously

Tialah

There's a good amount about them in Andrew Breitbarts twitter account and I'm assuming his book, I'd start there

Boyakasha

With -3k ccp, you should consider upping your elusiveness.

darkknight111

Oh I must have hit a nerve if a troll stirred his ugly head.

Guys, you'll back me up if this threat is for real, right?

Womb_Raider

Threat?

p0ssumsAlt

Yeah, his mom is going to take his computer.

darkknight111

https://www.sott.net/article/346100-David-Brock-Soros-funded-Media-Matters-founder-ex-boyfriend-of-James-Alefantis-and-Clinton-ally-suffers-heart-attack

Holy shit in regards to that bullet point. This confirms my intuition that there was something suspicious about them.

Excellent finds already. Keep up the pressure.

carmencita

http://www.independentsentinel.com/soros-puppet-david-brock-is-trying-to-get-sean-hannity-fired/ >I had a funny feeling they were getting to him. They are surely doing what they are doing to the Rich Family. Where the heck IS Brock btw? AWOL

swordfish69

  • James Alefantis and David Brock are Luciferians. It has been confirmed they had paintings of Moloch in their house.
  • David Brock and James are friends with the NY cohort of the Rothschilds.
  • Saul Alinsky is Brock's idol and dedicated rules for radicals to Lucifer
  • they provide Democrat propaganda for news stations around the world. Notice word patterns among leftist publications
  • they or ICMEC were origin of Fake News Story, but Koons is known to Alefantis and Brock.
  • The same person who designed NCMEC logo designed Comet Logo
  • Media Matters is partly run by CFR, Open Society, Owl/Minerva and more.
  • they are fucking pedophiles and child killers.

undertheshills

I forget who said it but someone who worked with him compared his personality to Mugatu from Zoolander.

jangles

David Brock and James Alefantis