This is just the first of three articles. It basically provides background information on various people and companies that I presume Corsi has tied into the murder. More to come.

Ok, I'm grateful for Corsi explaining the role of Seth Rich inside the D.N.C. and it all seems like irrefutable evidence until the very last paragraph. There he proclaims that Seth remained loyal to his principles whereas Paglianlo remained loyal to Clinton. Furthermore Corsi claims that Seth was upset by the Committee's rigging of the primary to insure that Hillary won.

Corsi has not offered one iota of evidence in this regard. Not even a report of such by a friend. He is presuming that since Seth was idealistic and guided in life by principles then he would have been so upset by the action of the Committee that he would steal the contents of his employer's computers to turn over to Wikileaks. This might very well turn out to be true but where's the evidence? Did he ever confide to a friend that he admired Snowden's or Manning's actions. Do we have an inkling about his views of Wikileaks or Julian Assange? These three men gambled with ther lives and paid a steep price. Do we have any proof that Seth Rich was willing to take such a risk? This is a leap of faith that I cannot buy into as much as I am prepared to believe that the Clinton Gang is villainous enough to snuff out a young man's life.