EVIDENCE BACKS CLAIM PRO-BERNIE SETH RICH WAS DNC LEAKER - Infowars 5/30/2017 ( pizzagate )

submitted by jstrotha0975

This is Pedo/pizzagate related because Seth Rich is suspected of leaking the DNC emails that Pizzagate was a part of. “As a result of this analysis, NGP VAN found that campaign staff on the Sanders campaign, including the campaign’s national data director, had accessed proprietary information about which voters were being targeted by the Clinton campaign – and in so doing violated their agreements with the DNC,” Dacey found. “These staffers [in the Sanders campaign] then saved this information in their personal folders on the system, and over the course of the next day, we learned that at least one staffer appeared to have generated reports and exported them from the system,” Dacey charged. While the DNC email server could have been hacked, what is equally plausible is that someone on the inside (perhaps an employee with their own @dnc .org email address) could have discerned the usernames (possibly identical with the person’s email address) and the password for each of the seven DNC officials included in the WikiLeaks release. https://www.infowars.com/evidence-backs-claim-pro-bernie-seth-rich-was-dnc-leaker/

jstrotha0975

patience. trump is moving the chess pieces into place.

waxdino

Was this Corsi's big announcement for today?

jstrotha0975

I guess so. i thought he was supposed to have proof that Seth rich was the leaker.

Viridia

Right, but that doesn't explicitly prove it was Seth Rich. Plus we've already had a few topics going over the Dacey e-mails before this article came out.

jstrotha0975

But it basically proves it was an insider and not Russia, unless Russia had someone on the inside which I doubt.

Viridia

Right. I don't get the feeling that that's what Jones or Corsi were setting out to prove though. The article title is about Rich being the leaker. I also seem to recall Jones claiming last week that Corsi had "proof from high level sources" that Seth was the leaker, but I'm not seeing that in any of his three articles.

jstrotha0975

Yes as always there's no direct proof, it's all circumstantial. But I mean we still get something, it pretty much proves that Russia did not hack the DNC and the Russian story is BS like we already know. It's just a matter of getting the MSM to drop it.

Viridia

As I said when I posted this article over on v/SethRich :

I'm still very skeptical about this being covered by Infowars though. Keep in mind that Alex Jones attached his name to Pizzagate a few months ago, then quickly apologized and backed off. The media used his apology to try to further prove that Pizzagate was "debunked." Considering the pressure they're already putting on media figures (like Hannity), I wouldn't be surprised if Jones gets pressured into apologizing for this too.

Also, Corsi doesn't appear to have said anything that we don't already know. His main evidence is 1) Assange's August 9, 2016 interview where he implied Rich was the leaker and 2) the apparent coverup by the WPD and DNC. There's no solid proof in here that Rich was the leaker.