4_InquiringMinds

JA doesn't do things by accident. There is the distinct possibility he is a gatekeeper. If so then wheels set in motion for the next pawns to be tossed under the bus. First you plant ideas into the collective, slowly develop unless there is an urgent time frame, do some tossing and move on to the next plot twist all for keeping the collective focused on the right hand while the left goes about doing 'things'.

Speculation of course~

ps...JA said 9/11 is a hair-brained conspiracy...nuff said.

dirtydirty

Ive seen this @rosetaylor nice to be reminded

Assange is a global hero

DeathTooMasons

Not forgotten. First comment I made is that we already knew this right after it happened. Why is everybody acting like it is a new revelation. Seth Rich was the leaker, there were no Russian hackers. Assange's comments were clear back then.

weewaawooba

I understand it differently. Assange hints at the unsolved murder of Seth Rich to imply that death might await whistleblowers. He ponders the possibility that Seth Green was silenced but I doubt that he was his source. He would not open the interview like that. He is not that dumb.

This was pre-election, wasnt it? He was openly supporting Trump over Hillary, so making people like you here at least think about the DNC killing Seth Green was probably his intention. That hurts Clinton and helps Trump ...

millennial_vulcan

POSTED ALREADY LAST WEEK

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1895802

fartyshorts

And also the day the interview was conducted. Like... Months ago.

millennial_vulcan

yes. But it was importantly to bring it up again last week. Possibly today too. Hell, it can never be bought up enough!

Hunter395

I know it's the article headline, but my interpretation is that there's a 99.9% chance that there was nothing accidental about this whatsoever. Assange wants people to know Seth Rich is the leaker, but he doesn't want to officially say so because it would tarnish Wikileaks' policy as one that never officially releases a source.

fartyshorts

Duh. That is obvious. Also, this interview was never forgotten.

Hunter395

Duh. That is obvious.

I would agree, but the article here states in both the headline and within the article itself that they thought it was accidental so I thought it was worth pointing out.

BB-3

Plus, if the source is already dead, then you can't really put them in danger by revealing their identity.

neverobey

interesting. Sounds reasonable.

neverobey

it's actually not forgotten. It is recognized and archived all over the internet. Like f.e. on conservapedia .

srayzie

Thank you. I like this website!

Viridia

Yeah, this. It's also the main evidence Corsi referenced to claim Rich was the leaker.

It may be old, but it's still good to spread around.

neverobey

It may be old, but it's still good to spread around.

Totally. I keep calm. Sorry. :)