A new investigative approach? ( pizzagate )

submitted by Judgejewdy

Yesterday I posted that wikileaks was being scrubbed. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1901529 Emails are being removed, for reasons we don't know. Perhaps this can be used as another investigative lead. We can can search the current version of wiki by search term, paying attention to recent leads that have come to light that we may not have been looking at before such as players in the seth rich case. For example, yesterday I looked up Clapper and saw that emails were missing. If I had the original drop (which I never archived bc I'm old and non-tech-savvy) I could find the missing ones and see what's so potentially incriminating about them. I know people archived the originals when they came out. Is there a way to get it out for us to look at?

Dig4Dutroux-Holland

Ah shit bro, for real? I'd tell you to eat a bag of dicks, but i can't know for sure that that wasn't what u were up to anyway.

Notgood

I think we just need to focus on investigating Skippy from those videos. He is the only one that we know as they for sure that is abusing children. He has a very unique voice and a very unique personality. He should be very easy for someone to identify him if they happen to know him in life.

TRUTH1234

I'd like to believe the information is being removed because it's evidence in an ongoing investigation. Who knows?

redditsuckz

It looks like the "Clinton Emails" is being blocked by the global search function.

The only way to search for now is to go directly to the Wikileaks Clinton Emails webpage which were the ORIGINAL emails released by the FBI because of FOIA requests as you can see "the original pdf" that was scanned;

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

Search for "putin" now shows up.

redditsuckz

The non-searchable 598 (missing) Podesta emails... (All of them except for 5)

https://www.reddit.com/r/DNCleaks/comments/6dq6s3/the_nonsearchable_598_missing_podesta_emails_all/

carmencita

OK, two comments that probably are both guilty of the down voats. A huge clue that you have hit a nerve. I am not good at it either, but keep this up here and hope that others will pile on and come to your aid. UPVOATS are in order for this post and a great idea and to get attention.

Judgejewdy

Yeah, the fact that people would get up in arms over the fact that I'm trying to shed light on something using a source (WL) that, especially when complete and not missing docs, we all have agreed is accurate and extremely important is.....ridiculous to say the least. I can't tell if the shills are dumb or they just think we are....

carmencita

I think they are not trying to convince us anymore, because we are on to them. Their main objective now is to indoctrinate and attract the attention of the NORMIES. They are Correcting the Record and then by down voating which will give a post a low mark and make it seem weak. They also like making us take time answering them.

Judgejewdy

Definitely

equineluvr

"Yesterday I posted that wikileaks was being scrubbed."

Yeah, and you got MANY downvoats as posters here corrected your erroneous statement.

You are a fool for linking to that other thread. LOL

DonKeyhote

Harsh