EngelbertHumperdinck

Calm down guys, he was probably just having a sexual emergency.

gumshoe_mob

OK gang. It is time to start posting the addresses of the judges in these cases and do letter campaigns to tell them just what we think of their judgment. We can't threaten any judge, but we can surely let a judge know that we are sick of these criminals being allowed to roam freely to continue their rapes and crimes. We might also get the addresses of that judge's superior court, and write to the justices about investigating possible collusion of a judge in their district.

carmencita

HOORAY! Applause is in order. I think they should be printed also. Just like the Pedophiles should be printed in the paper. A letter writing campaign followed up with a protest out in front of the courthouse with some very interesting protest signs. Woah! My husband just suggested that the Pedophiles must baby sit for the Judges Children! Ha. I bet the sentences would grow longer immediately.

emeraldeye

http://www.thejournal.ie/darknet-3311338-Mar2017/ Happening everywhere, recent case in Ireland, similarly shocking story, "suspended Sentence" basically no time served. One of many in Ireland. Seems this judge nolan has a fondness for pedos, always letting them off. http://www.broadsheet.ie/2013/11/18/who-is-judge-nolan-jailing/ https://www.google.ie/amp/s/theukdatabase.com/2017/03/22/david-radford-dublintallaght/amp/https://m.facebook.com/RevolutionIreland/posts/650859511633048

Mad_As_Hell

This case shows collusion between Irish police, courts and a high profile paedophile, he's still roaming free in Florida as far as I'm aware: http://www.broadsheet.ie/2016/04/29/the-chief-justice-her-brother-and-how-george-gibney-got-away/

Lawyer Patrick Gageby linked to several high profile Irish cases, some involving Satanic ritual abuse - between the Church, guards, politicians and legal system our little country is rife with corruption

emeraldeye

Its absolutely sick. Heres another I came across today, they are all protecting each other, rotten from the top down. https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/district-court/seven-men-who-allegedly-abused-child-will-not-face-prosecution-1.3102125%3Fmode%3Damp

Pizzalawyer

I agree that the sentence appears too lenient. There are so many factors that can come into play that the public is unaware of besides a lax or corrupt judge. It is possible that technical defenses were making the case difficult to prosecute such as a faulty search warrant or arrest warrant. Its possible that none of the parents of the young victims wanted their kids to testify. Sometimes a plea bargain is the best that prosecutors can hope for. The fact that perps and victims are 3000 miles apart can be a factor that defense attorneys can exploit. And 20 years of age is still young. If there are mechanisms to rehab this young man who might otherwise be an exemplary citizen then a light sentence might be appropriate. The problem, however, is that such light sentences cannot act as a deterrant to others.

Deflo56

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/pr/waltham-man-charged-child-pornography This needs an update. We know JD attorneys were told to go for the max. The Cabal keeps judges in their pockets.

ArthurEdens

My guess is he's a producer of the porn and his buyers bought the judge a nice car

TheyLie

2000 in restitution?

discoball

Most likely because of his age, he's only 20. Sure, he's an adult, but there far worse miscarriages of justice to get upset about. Take, for example, the du Pont heir who raped his own daughter and didn't serve time .

Shillaxe

Here is another ruling from ,the sentencing judge, Mark Wolf

"He stirred controversy when he ruled last month that the state must pay for convicted murderer Michelle Kosilek’s sex change operation, after he found that the procedure was medically needed and the inmate’s last option to treat her gender identity disorder." Nothing strange here...

2impendingdoom

This is part of a really sickening trend with judges across the country. Rapists and Child rapists are being continuously handed the "go out and do it again" card. Very, very, very troubling. Women and children are not safe at all, and the more sickos that are released, the worse it will become. If that were my kid victimized, I'd would find a way to make sure that guy has tragic accident. If the judiicary isn't going to be judicious or honorable, the American people are going to have to take matters into their own hands.

DawnofTruth

Holy shit...how about going after the people who made the film rather than those who possess them? I'm not saying I am condoning child porn.....but men who get off on this shit are usually victims themselves so its a learned behavior (usually)

Again, I'm not saying I understand people who get off on watching this shit but holy fuck......we never ever hear about where these films/videos originate from or whose behind the camera! Why? They can spy on everyone I thought?

EvaEverywhere

I don't do research on the industry of child exploitation videos but I read the text-based accounts of cases when possible. It seems like the video production is a sideline of human trafficking. Meaning the purpose is to make promotional material and the real money is in services. So when a video maker is taken down, they can threaten the lives (reputator, jobs, legacy) of their wealthy clients. This is a huge bargaining chip. We rarely get names of mass arrests. I would summise that relationships can be established between a lot of the small players and wealthier clients. All the people who have been arrested are starting points for social circle investigation... and in todayès connected social media age, it's probably possible to tie such suspects to elite via what they brag about online.

PubMaster

Read the Facebook linked below...he made these films & admitted sexual contact. I have never seen a "time served" sentence involving these charges. There is something VERY wrong here. Especially not when there is admitted criminal sexual contact.

PubMaster

This is highly unusual! I've been watching these for months & have never seen this before. He also admitted to sexual contact with a victim. I wonder why he got time served when the mandatory sentence is 5 years with a maximum of 20? https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10156892511445244&id=187104770243 Edit: Name is listed as Christopher J. Sullivan, age 20 Original post said name was not published when it was. I missed it.

Are_we__sure

His name is listed in the linked document. Is that different from the report you mention?

Edit: it appears to me that the possible sentence is zero to 20 years. http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/news/congressional-testimony-and-reports/sex-offense-topics/201212-federal-child-pornography-offenses/Chapter_02.pdf

The current statutory range of imprisonment for possession is zero to ten years of imprisonment if an offender possessed child pornography depicting a minor 12 years of age or older who was not then prepubescent and zero to 20 years of imprisonment if an offender possessed child pornography depicting a prepubescent minor or a minor under 12 years of age

PubMaster

I must've missed it. Will edit...thank you for pointing that out.

PubMaster

His admission to criminal sexual contact should have gotten him more than time served. And because he admitted to many more instances of this conduct, I find it HIGHLY unusual he would only get 16 months. And according to the original press release, it says he is subject to a minimum mandatory of 5 years. The images were of children 7-12 years old. He admitted to sexual contact with one boy.

All in all, from watching these cases go through the Justice Department, this is the first one I have seen where the sentence has been this light.

Gothamgirl

If he admitted sexual contact with one boy assuming he is under age, why wouldn't they consider it rape or molestation to? Something is very wrong with the system if this is the case.