Are_we_sure 2017-06-15T09:29:11

It's a really good theory if you have no idea what you are talking about.

A. Your use of DNC is just silly.

B. Antifa and hardcore Berniebros are not Democrats. They are further left. Way further in antifa's case.

C. The baseball shooter voted for the Green Party. The Green Party got 1.07% of the vote in 2016. Plain loopy to think this guy was influenced by the DNC.

D. Your theory only works if you cherry pick your villains.

Explain how these recent events fit into your theory.

White supremacist Jeremy Christian kills two people in Portland who try tell to stop screaming hate speech on a train.

White supremacist Sean Urbanski, a member of a Facebook group called Alt Reich: Nation, killed an army lieutenant in Maryland.

White supremacist James Harris Jackson from Maryland travelled to New York City just kill black men.

link

DarkMath 2017-06-15T14:26:50

"Your theory only works if you cherry pick your villains."

Hhm, it's kind of like you cherry picking evidence of molten metal in the basements of the WTC. One day there is molten metal and then a few months later there ISN'T any motel metal.

Just for the record do you think there was or was NOT molten metal in all the basements of the WTC?

:-D

link

Are_we_sure 2017-06-16T03:27:19

Many, times I tried to explain to you that steel is a type of metal, but not all metals are steel. And many alloys present in the WTC have much lower melting points that steel. One of them is aluminum. Tons of aluminum were delivered to the WTC that very day. At speeds around 500 miles per hour. Oh and the exterior of the building contained millions of pounds of it as well.

You should also look into the technical difference between heat and temperature, because once you understand that the fact that the heat persisting as long as it did shows it came from some source other than thermite which expends its energy very quickly.
The long term heat was from the many, many combustible materials present in the buildings and the energy generated by a hundred million pounds of building crashing into bedrock and the fires being protected by the pile itself

Thermite would also leave tons of other tell tale evidence that was not present at the WTC.

For one, the white hot bright light of thermite reactions would be visible for miles and easily distinguishable from the flames. (You would need tons of thermite to accomplish the job.)

For two, thermite reactions leave easily identifiable evidence because a thermitic reaction spits little drops of molten metals all over the place.

https://chem.umn.edu/sites/chem.umn.edu/files/thermite.jpg

These molten bits would form irregular wierd shapes like this when they cooled that would be seen when the steel was examined.

http://www.amazingrust.com/Experiments/how_to/Images/Iron_Lump_small.jpg http://www.amazingrust.com/Experiments/how_to/Images/Ti-metal_small.jpg

Thermite would also be very difficult to work with. It's unpredictable and would not result in the simultaneous structure failure that occurred at the WTC. It also requires an exceeding high temperature to ignite.

Thermite is usually ignited using magnesium ribbon. The temperatures of the office fires would have ignited this long before the towers fell.. There would basically be no way to setup an ignition system all around the WTC that withstood the fires for an hour and then all ingited simultaneously.

link

DarkMath 2017-06-16T11:33:21

"Tons of aluminum were delivered to the WTC that very day."

That's where I stopped reading. You forgot we've been over this before. Aluminum if heated hot enough is HIGHLY flammable. In fact Aluminum is sometimes used in solid rockets for that very reason. You know what a solid rocket motor is don't you AreWeSure?

When aluminum burns there's not much left afterwards

Be it in an airplane

Or in the Super Structure of a British warship

Your short memory and apparently lack of a science aptitude is very telling.

:-D

link

Are_we_sure 2017-06-16T12:36:10

I am no scientist. But I can read.

Aluminium is a relatively soft, durable, lightweight, ductile, and malleable metal with appearance ranging from silvery to dull gray, depending on the surface roughness.

It is nonmagnetic and does not easily ignite.

Also I have no idea what the molten metal consisted of. There's no reason to believe it's steel. Metals from wires and electronics melt very easily. Thin metal like wires melt a lot, lot easier than bulk metal.

link

DarkMath 2017-06-16T12:42:21

"does not easily ignite."

Gee AreWeSure the fire ball after impact looked awfully hot.

I used that picture because it had the Brooklyn Bridge in it. Did you know it's for sale?

:-D

link

abattoirdaydream 2017-06-15T13:49:04

You have to go back.

link

equineluvr 2017-06-15T09:29:11

It is MUCH more likely that the "shooting" was a FF to ensure that the House's gun legislation FAILS.

The House hearing that was scheduled was CANCELED because of this "shooting." Proposed legislation was to ease restrictions on SILENCERS, etc. Now it is doomed to fail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0N0jYPY5No FALSE FLAG Shooting CANCELED HOUSE HEARING ON GUNS

MY PREDICTION: Rep. Scalise, from Louisiana, the state known as "Sportsman's Paradise," will become the MALE COUNTERPART TO GABRIELLE GIFFORDS. He will do a 180 and suddenly be "pro gun control." He was only "shot in the leg," not "the head" like she was, so his ACTING JOB will be much easier than hers.

You heard it here FIRST.

link

abattoirdaydream 2017-06-15T13:50:04

We will see. I think the future congressional seats are more important than a bill about silencers, grips, etc, because that can be undone, and the most pressing problem for the DNC is the anger, apathy and split they are suffering currently.