PedoStomper

HOW DARE YOU BRING UP THE WORD "JUDEO" YOU ANTI-SEMITE SHITLORD SHILL!! ISRAEL IS OUR FRIEND! LONG LIVE THE ROTHSCHILDS!

PedoStomper

Well that's because SRA goes against their largely Atheistic worldview. SJW's, for the most part, hate God and especially hate Christians. They hate anything that even resembles rules or structures, things that they deem "oppressive," so naturally they hate God and his Laws. When you bring up SRA, what that says to an SJW type is "I'm a crazy Bible thumper, please mock and ridicule me." SJW's are the ultimate "if I don't personally see something take place, it never happened" people.

mrohm

Russ Cheit's The Witch Hunt Narrative and Phil Johnson's Decade of Nightmares both explain why these bastards are given carte blanche by the system.

BigDaddy69

When you create a profession where the primary unit of compensation is access to children, what type of individual did you think you would attract?

NoMoreScreenNames

The girls in the UK who reported the moslem gang-rape assaults were treated as perpetrators not victims, because of the notion that moslem=race. At least one reported that she was warned not to even talk about the ethnicity of her assailants, as if that were more important than their acts of assaulting underaged girls. How long until the pedophiles outrank their victims in the SJW hierarchy, and the victims are right back to being shamed for coming forward, as they were before 1970 or thereabouts? SJW's are dragging us backward, knowingly or otherwise.

Sharipie

The union takes care of their own

BigDaddy69

Exactly. The solution is to pay teacher less, so that the only people who are attracted to the profession are people who value access to children as compensation.

Sharipie

Wow, that sounds like it came straight from the teachers union. Put a little of your own thinking into it and get back to me. Until then, goodbye.

BigDaddy69

That's what teacher's unions do: advocate for teachers. If you read the article, the issue is that the administration (which is not part of union) was covering it up to keep the district from looking bad.

Sharipie

Sure they advocate for teachers, but should they continue to advocate for a teacher who they know is a pedo? You have to know that the union was aware of the guys problem.

BigDaddy69

You have to know that the union was aware of the guys problem.

(Citation needed). Teachers don't get tenure if they are constantly changing districts, not all districts are unionized, and the administration (which we know had prior knowledge of his kiddy-diddling) has the responsibility of firing people.

Additionally, people in the United States accused of a crime are considered innocent until proven guilty, and knowing that in addition to the false rape accusations teachers face (all it takes is one accusation to end a career), should the union NOT support an alleged pedophile teacher just because a student made an unsubstantiated claim?

You have to know that the union was aware of the guys problem.

How could they be? Unions don't have access to criminal records or disciplinary reports from previous workplaces. Once again, this is the responsibility of an administration trying to save face, and unions are just a leftist boogyman that's easy to lay blame on.

Sharipie

If you can't objectively look at the teachers union thru anything but Rose colored glasses then this conversation is useless.

BigDaddy69

If you can't objectively look at the teachers union

Objectively, teachers unions are supposed to advocate for the well-being of teachers, including those accused of crimes who have not been charged with a crime. The article does not say the union protected him, and it likely did not because teachers who are new to the district do not immediately get union protection, and not all districts have a union.

thru anything but Rose colored glasses then this conversation is useless.

Rose colored glasses

I don't think you understand what this term means.

this conversation is useless.

You're blaming the unions when:

  1. The administration (who is not part of the union and often actively works against the union) was the entity that knew about the rape and was covering up the rape

  2. The union does not make hiring or firing decisions

  3. The union does not have access to criminal records or accusations

  4. Some districts do not have unions, and unions do not provide full protection to teachers new to the district

  5. The administration knew about the molestings and had the responsibility to remove the dangerous predator from the school

Although maybe I am incorrect. Feel free to explain to me what role this Union had in letting this teacher rape children.

Shillaxe

Your name BigDADDY69 says it all.

BigDaddy69

I have no point so I will just autistically screech.

I win. Teachers unions have nothing to do with retaining pedophiles, admins don't want to pay for qualified professionals and it's cheaper to hire pedophiles instead of attracting talent who don't see access to children as the equivalent of monetary compensation.

Shillaxe

"...and it's cheaper to hire pedophiles" These are your words "BigDaddy69"

BigDaddy69

Because it is. It's a lot easier to convince a pedophile to work for 25k a year and no benefits than a qualified professional, because pedophiles see access to children as compensation for their efforts. At ANY point feel free to attack my actual arguments instead of jerking yourself off over the burning straw-man you have created from unions.

Shillaxe

No one that goes by BigDaddy69 should be allowed near children

BigDaddy69

Autistic screeching intensifies.

Okay, so you have no point to actually make. I win. I will now block you so I no longer get notifications from your autistic screeching.

And just so we understand: I win, I will not read your follow-up autistic screech, and I know you will respond to this because you are a tiny dicked little bitch-fag autist who needs to get the last word in.

Shillaxe

Sounds like I struck a nerve.

stillinit

In 2007, a male student reported Bryan was touching his female classmates on their lower backs and leaning over their desks to look down their shirts. It appears the district did not investigate. School staff recommended the boy go to therapy.

Therapy? WTF? How long until morals and ethics is considered a mental disorder that needs treatment?

JoeMontana

Lots of satanists looking out for each other in society.

Cold_Guinea_Pig

Oh shut up with that crap. Paedos are paedos because of their sexual desires not because they are into Satan. Actually most Satanists are down to earth humans that abhor this kind of shit. I don't know any actually, whereas the Catholic CHURCH has many hundreds or even thousands of paedos. Now adjust your labeling.

Shillaxe

Do yourself a favor & search Church of Satan, Maria Abramovich etc...

twistedmac11

Actually most Satanists are down to earth humans that abhor this kind of shit.

Yeah? Like Michael Aquino? Oh wait...

CognitiveDissident5

I hope someone pays him a visit