equineluvr

"Not surprisingly, Steve Lanava posts creepy fucking pics and has a single fucking Illuminati-ish eye as his Twitter profile pic".

It’s not unusual for a professional PHOTOGRAPHER to use an eye symbol.

That is a shot of his RIGHT EYE. The LEFT eye is used to denote the Illuminati.

LEFT EYE IS ILLUMINATI

The FOR SALE pic (YOUR LINK AND DESCRIPTION) is a different one – not obscene, not nudity. It’s a different photo altogether. Perhaps changed now due to public pressure?

http://www.telegram.com/news/20170626/beach-buddies

It is highly unusual for a newspaper to violate its own policies.

And YES, shame on them for ever posting the photo. But, again, you are INCORRECT on the two points above, OP.

DaleEaston

This newspaper is owned by a jew. Enough said. Time for this criminal jew maggot to die.

DaleEaston

Sorry, maybe I am missing something….but you seem like a typical, inbred, commie, satanist, homosexual pedophile piece of jew dog shit to me.

DonKeyhote

I see a boy with a shirt from behind about to catch a ball and zero junk visible anywehre.

If thats the originsl photo they ran youre all making us look like complete lunatics if you tweet them, wtf is wrong with you

SecondAmendment

That's NOT the original photo, Einstein. The Worcester Telegram and Gazette assholes must have finally caved to the pressure exerted on them (and noted in this Facebook thread - https://www.facebook.com/turtleboysports/posts/1951977441714904 ). So simmer the fuck down and stop lashing out at me. I'm just the fucking messenger and the message is that they posted pics of the kid's junk and then replaced the photo (after letting his junk be posted online, purchased, etc. from June 26, 2017, through July 4, 2017).

equineluvr

"That's NOT the original photo, Einstein."

It IS the photo at the LINK YOU PROVIDED for the "for sale" photo, "genius." Your link description in the OP is INCORRECT, as I have already pointed out.

DaleEaston

jews will only stop their pedophilia and sex trafficking when they are forced to. That's why they've been exterminated and expelled from every nation they've ever festered in, and it's the reason why the jewish criminal pedophile dog shit that own that paper removed the pic.

And it's why we need to start killing jew commie pedo dog shit right away.

SecondAmendment

Nobody here is calling for violence against anyone, @DaleEaston . We want justice through the legal system.

DonKeyhote

LOL then update your post idiot.

SecondAmendment

I did. Thanks for the reminder.

DaleEaston

Steve Lanava = jew pedophile that needs a bullet in its snout.

DaleEaston

Newspaper is owned by jews. This jewish dog shit needs to be hunted like the animals they are, then put bullets into their filthy jew pedo skulls and kill their entire family of inbred homosexual commie dog shit.

SecondAmendment

You're very welcome, @AshkenaziJews . I goofed when I wrote the Headline to this. I don't know how to change it. I should have said, "Posts Pic of 2-Year Old's Junk" or something more accurate. I'm sorry for the confusion and if anyone knows how I can change the title, I'll be glad to do so.

SecondAmendment

@AshkenaziJews , the kid is wearing a shirt, yes, but all his bits are hanging out in full view. According to the Turtleboy Sports thread on Facebook (seen here: https://www.facebook.com/turtleboysports/posts/1951977441714904) ) people have been contacting this shitrag newspaper all week to complain. Yet despite the complaints that a 2-year old boy's junk is out there for all to see, the Worcester Telegram and Gazette refuses to take down Steve Lanava's sick pic.

Gothamgirl

That is disgusting.

carmencita

Who is this little boy and was he for sale? This Worcester Telegram needs to be called out and researched. Removed? Up long enough to create some fun for their cohorts? Anyone that does this must expect some looking into. They are either suspect or TOTALLY CLUELESS.

SecondAmendment

The kid is not for sale, as far as I know, but the Worcester Telegram and Gazette is selling the picture: http://www.telegram.com/news/20170626/beach-buddies

I'm shocked. I am not on Twitter or I'd blast this. I cannot believe these sick fucks did this....

carmencita

I see. I clicked on Buy Photo and the prices are for pic sizes and mugs with pic. It is clear it is for the photo only. The reason I brought that up is that someone had a post on here saying that in the past on ebay, someone was offering head shots of children for very high prices $500 $1K, etc. No one buys a pic of a child's head. It is the child you are paying for there. Just wanted to make it clear. Still this is not healthy for a father to allow his 2 yr. old son on people's mugs with his privates hanging out from under the shirt. I call this as SICK or as I said TOTALLY clueless.