May be old news but a few more odd things about the Tony and Heather Podesta pic with hanging 'Hysteria" sculpture ( pizzagate )

submitted by Commoner

I noticed that the wallpaper or custom paint job on walls behind stairs resembles DNA-like genetic material that has been splattered about.

Also, there is grating/lattice under the stairs seem cage-like.

I am not sure this means anything, but that wall paper is a little creepy to have in your home.....unless you are into that stuff.

https://conservativedailypost-guvbvzsunddro8yrw.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/heather-tony-podesta-arch-of-hysteria-art-getty.png

Factfinder2

Good eye, Commoner. The figures look like X chrosomes.

new4now

I think they may be people. In her other works, it's a little clearer https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Michal+Rovner.%22&FORM=HDRSC2

Factfinder2

Rovner may be equating chromosomes with people in many of her art pieces, as in people are basically just chromosomes?: http://imgur.com/a/5w9kH

Truthseeker3000

Look up Michal Rovner. It is a canvas and the Xs are actually people walking. The art you will see in images is weird to us but brilliant and haunting to them. It appears to be clusters of people and some, to me, appear to be wearing the satanic cloaks worn during rituals or ceremonies.

UnicornAndSparkles

I had never noticed the cages under the stairs. They look eerily similar to vetinary cages .

It also looks like he has a cage in his bedroom.

carmencita

I don't know about the "artwork" behind them, but that Golden Torso takes Center Stage. It says so much about him. It is a copy of the Dahmer Torso. Oh My God, what is it that people just seem to ignore. Wake Up Newbies. Please.

Are_we__sure

It's not true that this is a copy of the Dahmer Torso. I have no idea how people would even know about Dahmer's photographs. I certainly didn't before people tried to make this link. Bourgeois was quite clear about what her inspiration was, the origins of psychology. Her Arch of Hysteria work predates Dahmer. From a comment I made previously.

Louis Bourgeois .... did many hanging pieces and multiple Arch of Hysteria pieces.

BTW, it's been proven (by me) that the Arch of Hysteria that Tony Podesta owns has nothing to do with Jeffrey Dahmer. She conceived of her first Arch of Hysteria in 1989 two years before Dahmer was arrested. That pose was inspired by a French neurologist who studied hysteria. here's her first sketch of the first Arch. https://www.moma.org/collection_lb/browse_results.php?object_id=70922

And heres the image that inspired her. It's is from 1824 and depicts, Opisthotonus , a painful spasming of the muscles that victims of tetanus and hysterics get https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdWVo4fWAAEMM_4.jpg

Charcot the neurologist who Bourgeois has cited has her inspiration (and who was a teacher of Freud) talked about the arc de cercle that hysterical patients and epileptics sometimes suffered. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Krzysztof_Owczarek/publication/221926258/figure/fig6/AS:305190860279813@1449774579686/Fig-6-The-circular-arc-arc-de-cercle-Paul-Richer-Etudes-cliniques-sur.png

Commoner

I don't see that it matters. It is obviously depiction of a human being in pain! fun, huh?

Are_we__sure

I do not see that at all in the Arch of Hysteria that Podesta owns. I see lightness. I see grace. I see an escape from the usual confines of the body. (My back is killing me today.)

It matters as an example of how poor pizzagate "research" is and how slanted it is. That this became a "fact" is just silly. Louise Bourgeois is well known artist, never in her career was she paired with Dahmer. All of a sudden, in 2016 she is directly inspired by him? How did this become a talking point, a fact? It must have come from somehow who is way more familiar with Jeffery Dahmer than Louise Bourgeois. The images of his victims are not well known at all, except among fans of serial killers. It's doubtful that image was even in circulation at the time she created the second sculpture. The first sighting of it that anyone can find is in a forensic textbook on homicide.

Bourgeois is an artist who is well covered. It's super simple to do a search and see what critics said about this piece. When you do that, you find out she talked at length about where her inspiration came from. (Among other things, it's her feminist statement on hysteria.)

The only way you could make this initial connection is if you didn't care what the truth was. This is not an "innocent" mistake. It's part of a calculated effort to use art as weapon against podesta and through podesta to clinton.

Also you can make great art out of horrible events. See any painting of Saint Sebastian or the Crucifixion of Christ.

mooteensy

Exactly. How do people justify this sick shit?

Gothamgirl

I just do a google search for "tony podesta cages" to find the picture of the cage in his room, to share here. While going through the images, I found on the 17th row 2nd pic a picture of a little girl that doesn't seem to belong. http://archive.is/dhNyR so I click the link. The images associated to this childs picture, are very sexualized young girls, including a pic of Madeline Mccann, and then also alot of real child pornography. I cut this picture off where the porn begins. http://archive.is/dhNyR

Current186

It's not a cage, it appears to be panels with a grid of painted squares or small, old school Polaroid style pictures. You can tell because the light reflects the same on the furthest and darkest squares as it does on the closest and brightest, indicating it's 2 dimensional and not a hollow or empty space. That being said, Podestas wife looks fucking wrekt and dead inside. Vile creatures the lot of them.

Travellingman

He looks like Satan and his wife looks like a vampire witch

ProudTruther

Also as has been noted before that freak has one of the worst cases of satanic pedophile face around.

DonutofShame

The stories begin in the fall of 2001. She was in her early thirties, working at a trade association, and on the rebound. Her second marriage had just ended. A friend, Dorothy Robyn, a Democratic policy wonk, suggested she meet Tony Podesta. Tony was decades older than she, and had been married once before, but he was young at heart. He took her to the opera for their first date. On the way, the story goes, they stopped by one of his homes to pick up a car. She noticed his art collection. "I don’t know why it is," Tony said, "but I have artworks where the women have no heads." The next day she sent him a note. It was signed, "Woman with a head."

http://freebeacon.com/columns/divorce-beltway-style/

I'm pretty sure, it should resemble splattered blood and headless people. The "cage" looks like frames with tiny boxes of art to me.

Omnicopy

Looks like a cage under the stairway

DonutofShame

I believe that's art with a repeating box pattern.

Omnicopy

You can see thru it

TimeOutofJoint

They look like little headless bodies to me, but could be gene shapes also.

RweSure

That doesn't look like wallpaper. It looks like a painting on a wall with no wallpaper.

That is probably a canvas.

bdiminishedminor7

Read the caption underneath the image: "Behind them an untitled photo by Michal Rovner."

Commoner

oh boy, thanks for that!

Commoner

you are probably right.

either way, it is 'different'.