steve1721

Here's my guess: Since Trump's election, America's silent-majority (of Electoral College affecting voters) is much less silent, with more frequent posts that challenge the far-left-liberal-biased "news" outlets such as MSN. More and more often, the top-rated comment points out the ridiculous bias and outright dishonesty of the "news" article that really is destroy-Trump propaganda. Well, just like what is happening on college campuses, liberals once again are censuring anyone who disagrees with their narrow-minded and often delusional thinking. Which is ironic, because the free-speech movement on college campuses was the darling of liberal causes in the 1960s. Liberals have deteriorated into being hypocritical fascists who can't discuss ideas; they can only assassinate the character of those who disagree with them, or shut down the discussion altogether.

dickface888

It's a good sign because they've been getting called on their shit all year. Bad sign because it's another part of the free speech snatch and grab.

Samsquamch

I actually browse MSN more than I should, and almost every political article is overrun with people that are starting to take their first baby steps into our way of thinking. MSN and other MSM outlets can't have that on their websites, because the it's hard to spin something when people already know the truth.

Blacksmith21

What I've noticed is that WaPo, HuffPo and several other sites have disabled comments altogether on contentious articles which could draw comments from the Deplorables.

AssFaceSandwich2

That started during the primaries when Berners were tearing to bits the crimes of Hillary in the sections. They couldn't have that. It is a sign they are backing up and are desperate. It's only gotten worse.

Seeing some of these fake-ass articles with the comment section disabled is infuriating.

Blacksmith21

I do like how they had the back-up plan on Komrade Sanders though. Had him wired 8-ways to Sunday, balls deep with his wife, in a bank fraud and misuse of office charges on the the pair.

The Deep State dropped it after the election but REAL agents at the FBI picked it up and wouldn't you know? The old fucker and his wife really were dirty as shit.

Any takers on a bet that the two of them are dead before the end of the year? "Murder/suicide"

AssFaceSandwich2

The flimsiest of charges against the whole lot. Or are we now believing the FBI?

Blacksmith21

Without question, there are still good elements within the Federal law enforcement agencies and Intelligence Community.

If there weren't, we would have been overrun a long, long time ago.

Flimsy charges? LOL. That's why BS (and spouse) hired the best K Street lawyers money can buy.

AssFaceSandwich2

Fair enough. Bernie is the most honest and least corrupt among the bunch so to see agencies go after him[through his wife] while sitting on dozens and dozens of major crimes by hillary, Inc. stinks. It just stinks up the whole room.

Blacksmith21

What happened is that real, rank and file FBI agents had a chance to look at the evidence and said: "there is a real case here."

The fact that the case originated under the last administration should be irrelevant, but it is not. It was insurance.

And I disagree. If Sanders was "the most honest and least corrupt" he wouldn't be facing 5-20 years.

AssFaceSandwich2

I haven't heard that so I'll have to look into it. Bernie, or his wife?

AssFaceSandwich2

And, lol, all these other motherfuckers need to be lined up for the firing squad for what they have been doing...

Blacksmith21

Left, right, center. I don't particularly care. Treason is treason. Fair trial. Judgment.

And if you aren't up on the charges the Sanders' are facing, I suggest you modify your choice in news outlets.

AssFaceSandwich2

I have been out of town, and here. ;)

Blacksmith21

That's no way to go through life ; )

AssFaceSandwich2

From the Bangor Daily, as reported by a GOP operative[as stated in the article]: "The questions from government investigators, as described by those who were interviewed or received subpoenas for documents, suggest the investigation is focused on Jane Sanders and alleged bank fraud, and not on her husband."

Blacksmith21

Understood. But, why do all articles clearly state counsel is representing both parties? He's under a microscope for putting "improper pressure" on the bank to issue the loan.

We shall see what happens...

AssFaceSandwich2

Yeah. Could be bad, could be a witch hunt. Clearly the one thing standing in the way of the shitty corporate Dems is Bernie. And lots of crimes and scandals, but the FBI doesn't seem to care about any of that. Ugh, make some fucking arrests already...

AssFaceSandwich2

Other than that it is an investigation. What source would you quote? Just asking.

carmencita

on the issues you care about, and we don't. I think they are getting too many nasty pizzagate comments about people like JP and others. Just like on twitter, people are taking to the net and speaking out.

quantokitty

I did notice that. I think they're going to try to find a way to censor information ... they just can't figure out how to do it. Maybe categorize it as racially insensitive or advocating violence. Not liking this at all.

ditch-digger

Hahaha, if YouTube has taught me anything; never ever disable your comments. Viewer count drops so fast.