InnocentLibyan

Better title would be - pedophile composed anti-pizzagate investigator article

InnocentLibyan

trackresponse on twitter is a Podesta linked account I had to report, I thought it was deleted but I may have just blocked it.

Tanngrisnir

My favorite part is "legal minor attracted community." If you are intentionally using a FBI recognized pedophile symbol I'm pretty sure you aren't up to anything legal.

DarkMath

Epic. I stopped right after reading author Ender Wiggin's mini bio: "Non-offending, anti-contact pedophile. I am sexually attracted to kids, but know sex with kids is wrong".

Holy fuck. That's like saying "Yes I like to collect bones and always have a fresh supply of duct tape and lime in my trunk but that doesn't make me a serial killer so I'd appreciate it if you stopped judging thank you very much.".

Someday when this war is over we'll all laugh at these freaks but for now the insanity is just so over the top it's hard to comprehend at times.

:-D

Commoner

This article is written like one you would see on SNOPES trying to debunk a story . It presents no substance, while ignoring major substantive facts.

InnocentLibyan

Yeah, it scratches the surface and makes every effort to say that the points they are covering are the main points, and that those points are capable of being dismissed. This person is just delusional.

Travellingman

Even though this is written by by an admitted pedophile it's actually worth reading. Especially the parts about "romanticists", which I'm seeing more and more of on voat. The people who seem to see something sinister or sexual in damn near anything involving children and adults interacting. He runs through basically everything that spawned pizzagate and I must say his arguments against a conspiracy are worth noting. He's obviously very well educated and intelligent and the whole thing is really well researched. Don't call me a pedo apologist , shil, whatever. Just have an open mind please.

EvaEverywhere

I enjoyed the article as well especially the part about people being romanticists versus ironics. I am an ironic but I believe in pizzagate. I find it just too bad that people are refusing to read it based on the source. It is well written and even though it is about "spin" it shows a lot of "spin" and is informational. When it comes to pizzagate, I listen to James Alefantis who has said that everything pizzagaters are saying about him is true, that he doesn't like children at all and that he and us are in different cultures. He goes on and on about "the family" (as to place himself at the center of it) and how his crew are "visionaries who will not be silenced" meaning they benefit from a certain level of protection for their hobbies and activities. The common thread in all of pizzagate is not the love (or lust) of children it is the focus on the control and consumption of them. This is not a "philiac" act it serves a greater purpose (Monarch/MKUltra).

This article says that the pizzagate crew is a bunch of injoking bullshitter ironics we shouldn't take seriously. But, again, the amount of effort and money spent on floating this macabre cannibalistic/murder "in joke" is so vast that it makes them seem sincere.

The plot device of this article is that it goes 75% of the way, ignoring the progress that has been made after the initial discovery of the content. Which is a very American-style propaganda technique. Pander to people's inability to pay attention or lack of care to know more once they have been given permission to dismiss something.

DarkMath

"Don't call me a pedo apologist , shil, whatever."

Sorry there's no way you're going to post this Pedophile friendly shit here and not be told you're a fucking Deep State shill and a morally reprehensible ass-hole.

This is like saying "Say what you want about Adolf Hitler but.........". Yeah, there is no "but". There is nothing acceptable.

"Say what you want about serial killers but..........."

"Say what you want about organ theft but............."

"Say what you want about George H.W. Bush importing billions of $$ in crack cocaine to kill poor black people........"

You get the idea.

:-D

Commoner

I will admit that I have not viewed it yet, however this "romanticist" definitions raises an eyebrow. I am always suspicious of using language in ways that redefines words.

"Especially the parts about "romanticists", which I'm seeing more and more of on voat. The people who seem to see something sinister or sexual in damn near anything involving children and adults interacting"

carmencita

This is scary. They write these pieces to "hoodwink" the masses into believing there is something romantic about what they are doing. I can't even read this, this stuff makes me so sick I feel ill. I have read many and have been tailed by pedos on here trying to convince me that children really want :it" and them. They are so full of IT.

EvaEverywhere

The writer casts pizzagaters as romantics and the people like Luzzatto, Alefantis and Podesta as ironics. By reading the article it seem evident that the writer sees themselves as an ironic. There are plenty of ironics on this forum (those of us who see the world in gray tones and not just as black and white).

carmencita

Yes I agree. I believe he may be one of them.

Commoner

I glanced through it just now. and it is written like a SNOPES debunking article....no substance to it whatsoever. The guy is more upset about what a guy in Texas tweets than he is what George Soros has done to people to steal their wealth.

carmencita

There is a reason he is stealing their and our wealth. To weaken us, to make us work beyond what we should have to. To tire us to the point of distraction. When we are distracted we do not realize what they are doing. That is why they have been winning. Until now. They are awakening. SNOPES is another enabler and defender of the pedos. They will cover for them no matter what. All of MSM (and they are included) have been bought) for many years now. Decades.

Commoner

yes. Who SNOPES snopes?

carmencita

No one. That is their plan. We need to Snoop on Snopes.