kestrel9

There first sentence is from the article. The part in parenthesis came from this: https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/features/The-illegal-orphanage-business-in-Ghana-287937

The illegal orphanage business in Ghana

I included it as an aside, a more generalized point of the corruption of orphanages ("some orphanages") abusing donations intended to be for school. The full quote is:

There are many charitable organizations in Europe, especially Netherlands and Germany that are willing to support orphanages in Africa and Asia by providing money, logistical support, and volunteers. Most of the illegal orphanages are able to link with these well-intentioned European charities. Funds are diverted to the owners and managers of the orphanages, who have benefitted tremendously from these partnerships. Often the funds, originally designated for classrooms and dormitories for orphans, are used to convert the orphanage into a lucrative private school.

So much to cover, sorry about the confusion.

Here are highlights from 'The illegal orphanage business in Ghana'

...unscrupulous orphanage operators have adopted a business model where the centres get more money from international donors if they have more children. Orphanage recruiters approach poor, often rural families, promising a better education, better food and clothing, and a brighter future for children who leave their families to live in institutions. There are many reports of cash transactions for the children, though these are usually referred to as donations to the families.

...there is a difference between caring for abandoned children and enticing poor families to give up their children. Illegal orphanages in Ghana are often run as businesses, the children being assets. Such institutions often are not even interested in taking in disabled and genuinely abandoned children.

Volunteers are sometimes placed at orphanages and later realise that they have been double-crossed, as most of the children in the institutions have parents. What disheartens them most is the affluent lifestyle of the owners of these orphanages in contrast to the deplorable living conditions of the children. According to one American volunteer who came to me after a bad experience with one of these institutions, some of the managers ”keep the kids looking poor and in thread-bare dresses in order to attract sympathy from donors. It’s a lucrative business and the children are the assets.”

...Volunteers often pay several thousand dollars for a two-week visit, or a correspondingly higher amount for a stay of several months. Many are placed at orphanages where they later observe that most of the children have living parents.

...many orphanages refused to release children once they were in their care even if a family environment was available.

One American intern who had been sponsoring a girl through a fund raiser in America for five years, decided to visit her together with the fund raiser. She discovered the girl was not an orphan (neither was her brother). The girl appealed to her to help her and her brother return to their parents because of the poor food, bullying and drudgery that they were going through despite the fact that they enjoy better education.

The intern appealed to the new supervisor to reunite the children with their parents, and assured him that she had developed a fondness for the girl and would continue to support her after her return to her family.

...much to her chagrin, the supervisor was unwilling to accept her plea, using the excuse that the girl would not get a good education in her village.

Edit: The Children whose parents pay for their kids to be in school at these orphanages (like a boarding school) are publically designated as Orphans in order to attract larger donations from NGOs, Churches, etc.