Mammy

UNLESS THIS IS THE WRONG "DEBBIE " then Debbie Davis has some explaining to do.>

Honestly, This is the part I would be most concerned about in exploring a potentially incriminatory or libelous lead, or non-lead.

carmencita

Yes, you are correct. Debbie could just be bad at math. New math maybe. We must not blame Debbie for forgetting one of her grand children. Grand parents do it all the time.

Mammy

Or-- IT COULD BE THE WRONG "DEBBIE" which would be pretty awful for both the accused and the accuser.

carmencita

I doubt it is the wrong one. It would be good to check the Search Bar again. I am not an expert at it, just started. But that is how I found it.

Mammy

Yes, but Carmencita we must protect OURSELVES in how far we go to making online accusations on private citizens. There are laws about slander and libel that differ for private citizens versus public figures. I won't pretend to understand them all and I am certainly not a lawyer but I do know this much: there are most definitely ways forums such as this can be subpoenaed to provide the ISP number of an individual poster to track him/her down and serve them with a lawsuit for slander/defamation/libel. That is essentially what recently happened when CNN threatened to dox a Reddit poster if they did not issue an apology and delete their account for making a meme of Trump beating up CNN. Please be assured I am not a "shill". I am just speaking from an experience. We just must temper our enthusiasm to out the pedos with caution as well as be mindful of mistakes that could be egregious to others and potentially libelous to ourselves.

carmencita

Thank you for your advice. I agree. We must protect ourselves. Sometimes we get caught up in finding information and present it in such a way that it may hurt others or ourselves, although unthinkingly. Thanks again.