A new movie is one more step at normalizing pedophilia. ( pizzagate )

submitted by Mrs_Ogynist01

I just saw a trailer for "Call Me By Your Name" - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5726616/

It is supposed to be a love story between a 17-year-old boy and 24-year-old man; however, the age difference in the actors is 11 years. The younger actor is 21 although could pass for 15 or 16 and the older actor is 32 - which he definitely looks. NAMBLA must be ecstatic over the release of this movie!!!

Narcissism

16 is the age of consent in a lot of the world so just another distraction away from what should be the real focus. We should be worrying about the 6 year olds not the 16 year olds.

Mylifeforanorange

This looks gross and stupid. No one pay to watch it.

hypercat

Breakfast at Tiffany's had Holly married to a man much older than her when she was 13. Then you have Lolita. There have been tons of films with younger women and older men. Oh, and then another one that is younger men and older women - Y tu mama tambien.

Votescam

Males are our sexual abusers of children as even right wing women's groups agree.

And they are heterosexual males. Homosexuals are 100X LESS likely to sexually abuse a child. Actually, it was tradition in Hawaii before the coming of the "white man" that homosexuals - both lesbian and gay - were held in honor and esteem for their care of orphaned children.

Pedophiles are thought to be a case of arrested development and may have no sexual-orientation. However, heterosexual males who may prefer sexual relations with females will sexually abuse a child when no female is available. If anyone wants more information on the studies, please let me know.

hypercat

It has to do with the retention of child like qualities of women that men are attracted to. It's an anthropological trait based on sexual selection. Men are attracted and want to protect women because they are like children. No body hair, more fat, smaller, softer etc.

Votescam

Women are not "childlike" ...

In fact, it is males who are the more vulnerable gender as more males are lost in spontaneous abortions which nature brings about when there is something wrong with the pregnancy.

And more males succumb to illness and death up to the age of two. Males also die earlier than females.

However, you've just given your theory on why males are our sexual abusers of children.

Again, if anyone wants more information on the studies which show that it is heterosexual males who re our sexual abusers of children, please let me know.

hypercat

Well then I guess anthropologists are all wrong, is saying that the retention of child like qualities as part of sexual selection is totally wrong. Who would you rather fuck, a nubile young thing or Frida Khalo?

I am just saying, part of the human brain is hardwired to want to have sex with young fertile women who are not hairy.

Votescam

Don't judge others by your own hardwiring.

Immature males may seek women with "childlike" qualities and some women may adopt "childlike" qualities to attract these immature males ....

We see this in "baby talk" and in females standing with their toes pointed in to imitate very young girls.

A lot of the clothing that we see being made for adult females today is reminiscent of clothing made for young girls.

We also often see the return of "slave shoes" for females and "choker" necklaces.

Again, these are things which appeal to immature males and they are "looks" taught to women to seduce males who are actually attracted to childlike behavior in females.

Children are NOT "fertile" which is one of the reasons why pedophiles are attracted to them.

hypercat

Youthful then. Perhaps "childlike" is not the best term. But women go through puberty around the age of 13-14 making them fertile. So, instead of older women who may have started growing a mustache or having excessive body hair, etc. men are attracted to young nubile women. I mean a horny 15 year old boy is going to want to hump a horny 15 year old girl. Older rich men get the youngest wife that is appropriate.

You think Salma Hayek is married to the crypt keeper because of his shining personality?

Votescam

hyper --

True "childlike" isn't the best term, though men are encouraged to think that women can't think for themselves and are childlike.

Also, this Hollywood Model of coupling which depicts females at 20% smaller than males is also a lie.
We know that not so long ago men and women stood shoulder to shoulder.
You could as well in recent times see this in the Puerto Rican populations for some reason where the females were often larger than the males.*
Some of that has to do with the fact that Nature intends that women carry more fat on their bodies which is required for childbearing.

Not sure, but I think because of our diets -- specifically animal eating -- females are passing through puberty at earlier ages. And that is being accelerated because of the hormones and chemicals being used on these animals.
One of the reasons for late terms abortions is cases of incest when even 10 year old girls have become pregnant, but certainly we are aware of 11 and 12 year olds who are past puberty. Puberty alone is not a signal that a female is strong enough to give birth to a child as what we know of childbearing suggests that it takes an adult female's body seven years for her body to return to full health and well-being.

Obviously, people can be attracted to the same sex or the opposite sex at very early ages. If you ask people when they were aware of their sexual orientation many will state very early ages. That doesn't mean that they were involved in sexual relationships with the same or opposite sex at that time, but we are all capable of feelings of affection and even love for one another at any time and we are aware of those attractions and affection.

True -- young teenagers will be attracted to one another -- whether the same sex or he opposite. And they do often become sexually involved at those ages.

Many immature older men will seek relationships with younger females, even under 16. And often pregnancies result and end in abortion.

But what you suggest is "appropriate" in relationships where the older rich men get the youngest wife is NOT appropriate.

  • That social engineering may also explain how we come to have "giants" and "dwarfs."

hypercat

I'm just saying, who doesn't want a young hot wife? No one goes out there and is like "Hey I am looking for a 38 year old fatty with small tits". By and large men are attracted to young women. Neotony exists. Sparse body hair, softer features, women don't have beards, sexual selection and what not.

Why do humans go gaga over things with big eyes and soft faces? Baby seals, baby penguins. Models with big eyes. Why do asians try to make their eyes look bigger to be more kawaii?

Because what we think of as cute, or desirable, is pretty much a woman looking young.

Does that mean I support pedos? Hell no. But you have to be kidding me if you can't at least agree that men are attracted to young women over older women. And that women have more childlike qualities than men.

Votescam

And what woman doesn't want an attractive male companion?

Take a good look at males today -- many of them need bras.

How about the beer bellies?

What you are describing are "baby faces" on children which are intended to make us fall in love with them -- and protect them -- not sexually abuse them.

Asians -- who are the majority on the planet -- seemingly came under culture shock after WWII and the invasion of the US army in Japan.

Not so different from women here being encouraged to have plastic surgery -- and breast augmentation.

Males in the US are obsessed with women's breasts and many think it is because of the lack of breast feeding since the late 1930's or so.

I'm sure many women are interested in younger males -- we are seeing those kinds of marriages more often now as women have more earning power.

it goes both ways.

Women have been trained to be desired --- not to concentrate on what THEY desire. Times are changing, however.

If women want younger more "childlike" males, will the males oblige and develop more "childlike" qualities?

hypercat

Biologically women want the opposite of child like in their partners. Which is why you see them more attracted to chiseled jaws (no one wants a Hapsburg), deep voices, taller than them, etc. Basically manly protector. No one wants a short fat neck beard and they never will because biologically they are seen as lesser.

Votescam

Again, the "Hollywood" coupling is suggestive of what everyone should want and it's long been propagandized as ... the right thing to want and do.

Women fall in love with men with "baby faces" just as often as men fall in love with women who are "baby faced." There's even a song about it.

While beards on men are being pushed now for decades, from what I see women and girls want guys without beards, with clean faces -- and nothing to hide behind. And a shave that produces soft skin -- no razor stubble.

The idea of a male "protector" exists because females have been so under threat by male aggression. I'm sure it would be a relief for males if they didn't think they might have to fight off some male thugs to protect their girl friend or wife. I'm talking about the men in our societies which other men fear.

From what I've seen and read, women are interested in men who support women and who are compassionate and humane.

hypercat

I am not going to go into all the research on human biology, nurture nature, facial hair trends (which does not connote baby facial structure), or the desire to retain a mate who is biologically fit and manly to protect not only women but their offspring. But it's a thing. But don't ask me, ask the American Anthropological Association.

Votescam

hyper --

You're ignoring what I've pointed out to you as to the artificiality of ... and propaganda surrounding romance and attractions. Much of it is created.

Like the role of organized patriarchal religion in mandating a sexual norm of heterosexuality ... because that benefits the church's membership ... whereas homosexuals do not as often procreate.

I've also offered "baby face" to challenge the concept of "childlike" ... they're two different things. One is about softness which women also appreciate in males -- the other is an insulting portrayal of adult males and females as mentally and spiritually immature.

You've also ignored the REASON behind the idea of a male as "female protector " ... which is that females have been oppressed by violent males and often subjected to harassment and rape by them. It is common even today to see gangs of males sexually assaulting women. This certainly isn't about "sex" as we know it ... it's about domination and control over another human being. This is also true of male on male rape.

This isn't about "research" ... this is about how these political oppressions are carried out in our societies and how they effect us all.

Another, "for instance" .... In order to send men to war the bond with females and children has to be broken.

But, then again, hyper ... I wonder if you have ignored those realities or whether you can't see them?

hypercat

I think you are relying on analogies and specific examples, vs. biological evidence over thousands of years. We can always observe a cultural thing, or a trend in a short period of time and chalk that up to biology, or we can observe over a longer period of time, like 50 thousand years, and the actions of evolution, and see a common and traceable trait, regarded as better by sexual selection.

You calling me by not my nick, but by a short version, is also pretty condescending showing that you think you are far superior and that I am uneducated.

Votescam

hypercat -- If you want to talk about history over 50 thousand years ago, you are talking about the violent overthrow of females and matriarchal-centered societies ...

When has that ever been acknowledged by our male controlled history or male biologists?

Historically, our professions of influence have been owned and controlled by White Male Patriarchy: Advertising, Hollywood, Corporations, Organized Patriarchal religions ... By those males in political control of our nation and its lawmaking over issues such as birth control and abortion. We've also seen medicine moved into the hands of males ... even to the removal of women who studied our plants which are our natural drugs/medicines - and women who served as midwives where childbirth actually became the business of males/OBGYN's.....!!

Who researched, wrote and controlled the "biological evidence over thousands of years" which you refer to except males?

Neither should we ignore the "propaganda of white male history" taught in our schools, universities, colleges... and echoed by media.

Nor has "sexual selection" been the privilege of females -- It has been males who have done the selecting which is why US society is so obsessed with female breasts.

Further, males patriarchy oppressed females into subservient positions, including into poverty which denied them even inheritance rights from their own families -- and rights to their own children . They were denied educations and access to professions ... all of which forced them into marriages in order to have shelter, food, clothing.

Btw, we are dealing here with the subject of sexual abuse of children which was covered up by Sigmund Freud in his Oedipus Complex which outrageously suggested that it was infants, toddlers and very young children who were the sexual aggressors against adult males in their families:-- fathers, grandfathers, uncles, male cousins -- and male friends of the family.
Freud betrayed his young male and female clients who had confided in him their sexual abuse by males in their families and male friends of the family. The Oedipus Complex was written to HIDE the truth of sexual abuse of children being carried out by males in our societies.

PS: If you notice, I shorten everyone's username and use it just so they know the message is for them... I rarely note the user or their personality.
If you think I am superior and you are un-educated, it is all in YOUR mind.

hypercat

I am not even going to respond to these points because it sounds exactly like the conspiracy theory sub. Bouncing around with random facts to the point of incoherence.

Votescam

hyper --

Good for you ... cause this is certainly "Conspiracy-free America" ....

Alois_sticklgruber

In the 90s Christians said the gay movement targeted kids, and promoted pedophilia.

They were attacked relentlessly by the media. In the 90s Christians complained about satanic child sacrificing cults. The media attacked them relentlessly

Both seem to have been true, as spiritcooking, and pedophilia by faggots is now out in the open and not in hiding anymore

Votescam

"Christians" continue to try to demonize homosexuals who are 100X LESS likely to sexual abuse a child according to studies. It is heterosexual males who are our sexual abusers of children.

The nation has learned about this sexual abuse of children because of the courage of children who have been abused in coming forward to relate their stories to us.
Often, they themselves have been demonized for telling these truths. That's why it is so important to "Listen to the Children."

The vileness of "spirit cooking" and the violence involved in "Satanic" abuse and murder of children goes on because of its violence primarily and the harm done to the minds of its victims.
It takes children decades to recover from this madness and truly they are permanently injured.

However, "Satan" and the "Devil" and "Heaven" and "Hell" are the inventions of male-supremacist religions which came thousands and thousands of years after the Old World Religions which were based in Nature and which had no "Satan" and no "Devil."

Male-supremacist religions invented these demons in order to control the minds of its members. That does not mean that "Satanism" isn't a cover story for the true violence and sexual abuse and murder which these people themselves perform.

Again, it is heterosexual males who are our sexual abusers of children. If you want more information on those studies, let me know.

Alois_sticklgruber

You make wild claims about faggots not abusing kids. If a straight heterosexual man abuses a boy, he isnt straight is he? Hes gay, hence why gays molest boys, see?

Votescam

You're just seeped in your religious hatred for homosexuals and can't accept any other reality.

Pedophilia is about the age of the victim, though there are gender preferences.

If a heterosexual male sexually abuses a child, that is "situational" pedophilia.

Homosexuals seek adult relationships with other adult males.

Here's some details on one of the studies --- Homosexuals are NOT our sexual abusers of children

QUOTE -- "Focus on the Facts" -- Sean Cahill, PH.D

A 1998 Study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 90% of pedophiles are men, and 95% of these individuals are heterosexual.

Research has indicated that gay men and lesbians are less likely than heterosexual to sexually abuse children.

Perhaps the most egregious and damaging claim promulgated by anti-gay groups is the claim that homosexuality is intrinsically linked to pedophilia and child sexual abuse. The social science research on sexual orientation and child sexual abuse clearly disproves the claim that homosexuals are more likely to molest children.

A 1998 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 90% of pedophiles are men, and 95% of these individuals are heterosexual. One researcher explained this statistic by noting, "Gay men desire consensual sexual relations with other adult men. Pedophiles are usually adult men who are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. They are rarely sexually attracted to other adults. In fact, research has indicated that gay men and lesbians are LESS likely than heterosexuals to sexually abuse children. Two studies that examined the sexual orientation of convicted child molesters found that less than 1% in one study and 0% in the other were lesbian or gay. One psychologist reviewed the existing social science literature on the relationship between sexuality and child sexual abuse and found that "a gay man is no more likely than a straight man to perpetrate sexual activity with children." Further, "cases of perpetration of sexual behavior with a pre-pubescent child by an adult lesbian are virtually nonexistent."

Gay rights activists, like all advocates for children's welfare, oppose child sexual abuse and support equitable age of consent laws that help prevent and punish such abuse.

At least 110,000 children are waiting to be adopted in the US. Approximately 588,00 children are currently in foster care. Barring gay men and lesbians from adopting or foster parenting decreases the number of potential suitable homes for children in need.

Children who remain in foster care for much of their childhood, as do tens of thousands of American children, are more likely to have emotional problems. Some children in foster care live in 20 or more homes by the time they reach the age of 18. Barring gay men and lesbians from adopting or foster parenting is not simply unjust and unethical; it also decreases the number of potential suitable homes for children in need.

Research shows that children raised by gay and lesbian parents are not disadvantaged vis-a-vis their peers raised by heterosexual parents.

Footnote 65 -- p.123

A review of 352 medical records of children evaluated for sexual abuse during a 12-month period at a Denver children's hospital found that less than 1% had been abused by a gay man or a lesbian. Of 269 adult perpetrators of child abuse identified among the 352 cases of abuse, only two were gay or lesbian. The vast majority of the children in the study (82%) "were suspected of being abused by a man or a woman who was, or had been, in a heterosexual relationship with a relative of the child." And the review concluded that in this sample, " a child's risk of being molested by his or her relative's heterosexual partner is over 100X greater [than the risk of being molested] by someone who might be identifiable as being homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual."

Jenny, C., and Roesler, T.A. (1994)

Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals? Pediatrics. 94(1).p.44.

In an earlier study of convicted male child molesters in Massachusetts, none of the 175 men were found to have an exclusively homosexual adult sexual orientation or to be primarily attracted to other adult men.

Groth, A.N., and Birnbaum, H.J. (1978).

Adult sexual orientation and attraction to underage persons.

Archives of Sexual Behavior.7(3).pp.175-181.

Also : The right-wing "Family Research Council" notes/confirms findings that "almost all child sexual abuse is committed by men." UNQUOTE

Alois_sticklgruber

You think a guy raping a lil boy isnt gay?

Only a raging cocklord FAGGOT would think that.

Follow along,

guys who fuck guys = faggot

Guys who fuck boys = faggot

Therefore a guy who molests boys is gay, not straight. Pretty easy concept to grasp

Votescam

Pedophilia is about the AGE of the child .... Read something about it -- the internet is loaded with information about pedophilia.

Again -- "Homosexuals are 100X LESS likely to sexually abuse a child than a heterosexual male"

Our sexual abusers of children are MALES and they are heterosexual males as studies show.

Alois_sticklgruber

Homosexuals like humans of the same sex, girl-girl, or male-male.

Heterosexuals like humans of the opposite sex, girl-boy, boy-girl.

Therefore if a male rapes/molests another male its homosexual, not heterosexual because of above ,CLEARLY defined definitions.

I dont include the mental retarded definitions, such as non binary, cross dressers, because if we look at birth gender thats all we need to classify them, no mental gymnastics needed.

Votescam

You seem to not get the most important thing about pedophilia or situational pedophilia.... which is AGE. That's what pedophilia is all about ... AGE.

There are various terms beyond pedophile which have to do with the AGE of the victim. Many pedophiles lose interest in a victim once they reach puberty.

Homosexuals do not sexually abuse children. Homosexuals are interested in adult relationships with other adult homosexuals.

Homosexuals are NOT our sexually abusers of children.

Heterosexual males are 100X more likely to sexually abuse a child.

Alois_sticklgruber

Only a Homo would think Men Fucking little BOYS isnt gay.

Everyone else recognizes faggotry when we see it.

Men who rape boys are fags, simplest thing to get...

Votescam

Try actually reading something about pedophilia. There are gender preferences but it is about AGE of the victim. And, actually, the majority of those sexually abused are female.

So what you're saying in your very confused way is that homosexual males are sexually abusing women?

Or are you trying to accuse lesbians ....who pretty much have never been found to sexually abuse a child?

Further, among those sexually abused are infants, toddlers, young children who are sexually abused by heterosexual males.

Alois_sticklgruber

We can argue till you die of aids, it don't matter to me, ill never believe that straight people who fuck/molest/rape others of the same sex would be considered straight.

Once you fuck/suck/molest someone else of the same sex (male, female, only 2 genders) you cease to be straight.

And you say a lesbian has NEVER been found to sexually abuse a child? Google lesbian molests kids, and come back here and lie some more.

I dont know why its so hard for you to grasp a simple statement, men who have sexual relations with other males (boys, infants, old people, as long as they are male) are GAY.

If a male molests a women (child, women, old lady, doesn't matter the age) he ISN'T GAY. Hes just a rapist, molester.

Thats it, simple as that.

Votescam

How old are you?

You actually think sodomy - fellatio or cunnilingus -- is practiced only by gays and lesbians????????

Again, I encourage you to actually READ something ..... like a dictionary, for instance.

https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylc=X3oDMTFiN25laTRvBF9TAzIwMjM1MzgwNzUEaXRjAzEEc2VjA3NyY2hfcWEEc2xrA3NyY2h3ZWI-?p=sodomy&fr=yfp-t&fp=1&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8

Meanwhile, since you mentioned AIDS ... About 30 years ago in Brazil, many heterosexual women were coming down with HIV/AIDS, though it was very clear that they had only had sex with their own husbands. And never used drugs.

Eventually -- in this Catholic country --- doctors had to come to realize that about 30% of the male population was having sex with other men.

They had no knowledge or evidence of this before the AIDS epidemic.

But even the DOCTORS didn't realize what was going on.

Also --

I'm presuming that you're so naïve because you are young ...

but you should also know that in Latin America -- likely because of the teachings of the Catholic Church against both birth control/contraceptives AND their teachings that sex is only for procreation -- anal sex between married couples was often practiced in order to avoid pregnancy.

Re Brazil -- MSM = "Men Who Have Sex With Other Men"

Results The percentage of MSM involved in risky sex practices differed significantly between years. The proportion was high in 1995 (49.9%), decreasing significantly in 1998 (32.6%), increasing again in 2002 (54.6%), and reaching the lowest level in 2005 (31.4%) (Figure 1). This same pattern was observed in the two age brackets studied.

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2009000600021

And ...

Thus, Brazil had to prioritize more vulnerable population segments like women and children (to prevent vertical transmission). This decline in funding particularly impacted AIDS and STD prevention in the male homosexual and bisexual community, especially from 1998 to 2002. Specifically, the year 2002 showed the highest proportion of risky sexual practices in this community, which had shown decreases in unsafe sex practices until 1998.

Alois_sticklgruber

Who cares what monkeys in brazil did to get aids.

What do blowjobs have to do with faggotry? Are you saying if a man sucks a dick hes straight?

Im old enough to remember when faggotry wasnt openly flaunted, and when common decency was the norm.

You actually think guys who suck dicks arent gay..hahahahahahaha is it because you've sucked some dick and now regret it?

Votescam

Monkeys?

You must be really fun to be around.
Just how filled with hatred are you?

Let's see ... homosexuals, women, and people of color ... Is that it, or is the list much longer?

You're old enough to remember what you were TAUGHT ... either by religion or by frightened and ignorant friends.

"Are you saying if a man sucks a dick hes straight?"

Again .. just how naïve are you? We have more than 200,000 rapes in our prisons every year -- MSM -- do you really think that every male in our prisons who rapes another male is homosexual? In fact, it is often homosexuals who are raped by heterosexual males.

Take this opportunity to wake up ... It would be a shame to let someone as ignorant as you are go on uncorrected.

Alois_sticklgruber

Hahahaha you are a faggot.

I have no problem with women I dislike ignorant fags like you who try your hardest to pollute the best country in the world with your never ending faggotry.

Men who have sex with other men are gay. Thats the meaning of homosexuality, people who have sex with the same sex. Its not hard to grasp, its very simple

Boy fucks girl = heterosexual

Guy fucks boy = faggot

See? Its very simple, ive never talked to someone who cant fathom it

Votescam

Boy fucks girl = heterosexual Guy fucks boy = faggot

Do you have that tattooed on your chest to remind yourself?

Actually, as is often said, homophobia is often a sign of denial by men who fear they may be gay.

Bye --

Alois_sticklgruber

Is water wet? To you, im sure you'll argue its not

Faggots like faggots, MEN like women. You are a faggot, i am a man.

Because i hate faggots, you say its a sign of denial? That is the dumbest statement ive ever heard, next youll say because i dont like moslems its because i am a moslem...

How have you survived this long in life? Or are you a faggot living off the government like so many, because its common knowledge fags leech of the government.

Enjoy aids

hojuruku

I just saw a a popular movie tending on the top 10 on torrentday that I didn't download about a girl meeting a guy who fucked her when she was 13. https://youtu.be/QSpZBmnamhg

https://i.imgur.com/hzC3HF9.jpg

Una (2016) Drama Ratings: 6.8 / 10 Votes: 1,293 People Directed by Benedict Andrews. With Ruby Stokes, Rooney Mara, David Shields, Ben Mendelsohn. A woman confronts an older man, her former neighbour, to find out why he abandoned her after they had a sexual relationship when she was thirteen. Actors: Ruby Stokes, Rooney Mara, David Shields http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2315582/

The jew Hollywood normalizing pedophilia has been around since Lolita. Only Hitler's Germany stopped it for a time, but David Seeman doesn't approve so we can't do that.

PrideOfOshtekk

"CALL ME BY YOUR NAME, the new film by Luca Guadagnino, is a sensual and transcendent tale of first love, based on the acclaimed novel by André Aciman."

Nice description for Hollyweird degeneracy. "transcendent" - > Yes, Crowley thought that fucking underage boys was "transcendental" too.

JunOS

8.1/10 stars in imdb.

The groupthink of jewstastic Hollywood knows no boundry.

HappyHacking

Havelock Ellis and Alfred Kinsey are responsible for this decline in morality.

DeadBeatNigger

Someone on /pol/ pointed out that ever since DWS got her hard drives confiscated, the left has been racing to normalize pedophilia ASAP.

Votescam

This is BS and propaganda you continue to buy into by the right wing which continues to need to sell its propaganda of hatred and intolerance for homosexuals in order to create the artificial "norm" of heterosexuality. We haven't even gotten to discussing bi-sexuality yet. Bi-sexuality is another issue which has been buried in the effort to create on "norm."

These are all the hatreds taught by male-supremacist religions and it's time to stop supporting them and release yourself from those hatreds. I'll remind you that those teachings by organized patriarchal religions has resulted in thousands of years of violence against homosexuals. And that's what they are intended to do.

Stay on the side of the non-violent.
Violence and force is a clear signal you are on the wrong side. Pedophilia is based in violence and force.

DawnKeyhote

Uh, excuse me, but theres nothing "unnatural" about sexual intercourse with an excretory organ.

HappyHacking

So then oral sex is also taboo.

DawnKeyhote

LOL Wut

SavageWorm

Eww.

Amino69

More cultural Marxist crap, yawn!

Jobew1

Id also say its normalizing homosexuality....but ithat has already been normalized since the powers that be started that in the 60's n 70"s. Its been so normalized that ill probably get comments or downvoats for being some type of bigot

aleeum

holy fuck what happened to this sub?

equineluvr

^

Yep. There are tons of brainwashed Voaters here who are homo apologists or faggits themselves. They will downvoat you for sure!

angry_mob

fuck off horsecunt

HappyHacking

Since you are keen to present narcissism as physically measurable, well so is sexuality in the amygdala. Some animals are gay.

HappyHacking

Homosexuality was common place in classical antiquity predating the bible.

Jobew1

what do you mean by "common place"? u saying that it was practiced by the majority or even a significant minority? (if so how bout a citation)

HappyHacking

Most Spartans had a young male lover.

Jobew1

the fact that it May (i"m not gonna research it) have been statistically significantly prevalent within one group within ancient greece or even within all of ancient greece doesn't mean its not always been an abnormality everywhere else for 1000's of years despite what MTV told you in 1999. again even if we assume homos were statistically significant in sparta/ancient greece many believe this is what led to its downfall (which if true would circumstantially corroborate that it's abnormal)

angry_mob

total bullshit. it's also evident in the animal world. some people are born gay. & what the fuck business is it of yours, anyways? you don't need to be thinking about what other adults are doing in their lives and bedrooms. none of your business. period.

Jobew1

It can possibly be a genetics thing ( definitely not 100% genetics in all cases),, i dont wanna criminalize or persecute those that are gay/consider themselves so. i dont think it should be pushed as a lifestyle choice to the young n confused. pushing it like that and widespread numbers do have, at a minimum, tangential effects upon society.

angry_mob

good, i hope they all turn gay. the world would be a much kinder place! then the pressing issue of the day would be whether our shoes are sparkley enough!

edit: why are the young necessarily confused?? who said that? they are not. the adults, i think, are the confused ones, because society guilt trips them to that point!

angry_mob

and what would you say if some stranger started telling you who you can have a relationship with or who you can sleep with, would you like that??? DIDN'T THINK SO.

HappyHacking

So tribes pushing their penises inside their bodies is unnatural is it? I think you will find that would be culturally relative.

Homsexuality caused the downfall of Greece did it? That's laughable. Greece ended with Cleopatra giving birth to Little Caesar aka Jebus.

Jobew1

tribes n penises in their bodies??? laughable or not, it's been stated by many (not saying I believe it - nor did i say I believed that "most" spartans were gay).....we will....uh....agree to disagree.

HappyHacking

I am referring to the tribalistic practice of binding ones penis and inserting it within ones own body. Real cultural practice, I am sure it doesn't make sense to us because we are culturally brainwashed, all of us. This is truly what Huxley meant by transcending nationalism and tribalism and connecting to one another in the glory of truth. A one world government, technocratic society.

Jobew1

It doesnt make sense to us not cuz were culturally brainwashed but cuz it serves no conceivable purpose. Huxley was a shill...."glory of (huxleys) truth" n 1 world govt arent good

HappyHacking

It's called The Form Of Knowledge and realisation of God.

scotchfor1

God smote motherfuckers like mad in the old testament simply because they were sexually immoral.

HappyHacking

That's why the Cathars carried on the tradition then right?

No try again.