ShadeEather

@Gothamgirl Oh look a thing... Better delete that. Don't want the rabble getting any ideas.


Test. Fill in the blank.

You ______ me.

Watch on full screen and try not to think of an answer before watching the video.

ShadeEather

Arturo Sarukhan

Gothamgirl

"Don't know" would be my guess.

Isn't green used to decimate the mind? and I have no idea about purple.

ShadeEather

More nuanced then I expected. Let's tweek it slightly. There is no right or wrong answer but try to throw out any preconceived notions of what it could be. Watch it once more with this change in mind:

You should _____ me.

A pre-programmed message is embedded which I will reveal after this.

Gothamgirl

Remember. I really have no idea.

ShadeEather

Password: ThisISPe3rception3

It's meant to draw forward subtle fears.

Gothamgirl

Maybe I have seen to much of it, to be afraid.

ShadeEather

No, latent fears within yourself. Something to reflect on.

Crensch

Posted by @3141592653 who asked a [M] to bother an [O] to keep his NON-PIZZAGATE posts up.

Now you've got an irritated [O]. Congratulations.

3141592653

Not what happened at all

Crensch

Don't really care. You had the cods to push for a turnover of a deletion that absolutely should have been deleted. I was called in, and now I've completely destroyed any credibility you might have merely by examining your posts.

3141592653

Your threats aren't having the intended effect. They just say a lot about you. Asking a mod for an explanation is beyond reasonable, especially in this case

Crensch

Your threats aren't having the intended effect

They most certainly are.

They just say a lot about you. Asking a mod for an explanation is beyond reasonable, especially in this case

You've shown gross misunderstanding of the rules with multiple submissions. Yes, you are beyond reasonable .

Crensch

To anyone whining about my removal, NOTHING LINKED THIS TO THE TARGETS OF THE INVESTIGATION SPECIFIED IN RULE 1

Nothing.

EllaMinnow

I admit I was unfamiliar with backpage.com (I honestly thought they were talking about the back page of the Riverfront Times), so I looked it up. It's very much like Craigslist. It's separated into states, then further into cities. So I'd certainly think this is more than just a Missouri only issue. Maybe other states will join the fight.

River_Otter

Is this why the NAACP just issued a travel advisory against a US state for the first time in Missouri?

Commoner

Could be. I thought it had to do with the black lives matter protest at the University of Missouri last year or year before. And I heard that Obama sent those protestors in to Mizzou because he was mad about something Missouri did, but I can't remember what it was for.

peacebringer

It needs to be shut down!

3141592653

from the article: "ST. LOUIS - Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley announced he is taking legal action regarding Backpage.com, a website accused by some of helping facilitate human trafficking.

At a press conference in St. Louis on Tuesday, Hawley said he has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Backpage to block an investigation by the attorney general. The court documents Hawley filed included new evidence he claimed shows Backpage is directly involved in human trafficking.

“This is my message to Backpage: the truth cannot be stopped,” Hawley said.

In May, Hawley launched an investigation against the website after reviewing evidence that indicated Backpage was involved in promoting illegal trafficking on its website.

On July 11, Backpage fired back by filing a federal complaint, saying Hawley’s investigation was in “bad faith.”

“That lawsuit is meritless. It is a shameless attempt to stop our investigation and keep my office and the people of Missouri from getting the truth about Backpage,” Hawley said.

According to the court documents, a subcommittee of the U.S. Senate concluded Backpage deliberately hid the sexual exploitation of children by hiding words that would be red flags, such as “Lolita,” “rape” and “little girl.”

The documents also point to Backpage hiring “offshore digital consulting firm” Avion, a company based in the Philippines, to help the website profit from trafficking activity.

Hawley said Backpage worked with this contractor to re-profit from illegal sex trafficking by encouraging traffickers to stop advertising their illegal activities on competitor websites and advertise on Backpage's site.

During the conference, Hawley also played an audio clip of a Backpage contractor and the author of an ad for human trafficking.

“You can begin to see why Backpage has been so eager to make sure that none of this evidence sees the light of day,” Hawley said. “But we are not going to stop.”

Hawley called for Backpage to come forward and tell the truth.

“I can promise you this, I am not going to stop until we get it,” he said.

U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill has been going after Backpage and its alleged complicity with human trafficking for a number of years.

On Tuesday, McCaskill and a group of bipartisan colleagues made their own announcement about a plan to introduce legislation called the "Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act." They also want to clarify the Communications Decency Act to make sure victims of sex trafficking would receive justice.

“That’s what this bipartisan bill is all about,” McCaskill said, "better protecting Missouri’s families from sex trafficking by making clear to any company considering going into business with sexual predators, that the law won’t protect them from responsibility.”"

Baddabing

It makes me wonder: who owns the company that owns Backpage?

3141592653

very good question

carmencita

Whoa. I hope Hawley means what he says. I have an interest in St. Louis so I am hoping that they put them out of business once and for all. I am somewhat Progressive and McCaskill is not although she likes to pass herself off as one like HRC whom she supported. I think I would trust Hawley more than her. Those from Mo. please let Hawley know you are behind him taking action against Backpage. @Jem777 @mooteensy @Wolftrail7272