Factfinder2

@Millennial_Falcon , this should not have been removed. It does comply with Rule 1, which is the reason you cited for removal. The elites are establishing a network of sanctuary cities that protect criminals such as the ones discussed in the linked article. I quote from Rule 1: "...and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities."

Please reinstate this pertinent and informative post.

Millennial_Falcon

For this to pass Rule 1, there would to be evidence that elites are following sanctuary city policies specifically for the purpose of allowing the illegal aliens to abuse children. Something that incidentally protects a child abuser does not qualify.

p.s. FYI, we have no method to "reinstate" a post. The submitter may be able to "fix" it and repost, though.

Factfinder2

No one is able to read the minds of the elite. We are collecting information here, and we do not have the burden of proving the elite's intentions before posting research regarding their actions. You are following the letter of the "law" but not the spirit. There is middle ground to find here in pursuit of our research goals.

Please invite the OP to repost.