New VICE news article: "No one knows if porn is bad for you." I think there may be a child porn image on the picture that is with the article. ( pizzagate )

submitted by abcdefg222

Article: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmmbq9/no-one-knows-if-porn-is-bad-for-you

I was unable to archive. I keep getting error messages.

Anyway... I'd never heard of VICE news. It airs on HBO and they just did a hugely popular video regarding the white nationalist rally in Charlottesville which is what introduces me to it. I was just glancing at their articles on their facebook feed and I came across this article. I haven't read it, but I was taken back by the photo accompanying the article. There are different blurred porno images and one looks like child porn. I can't tell for sure, but isn't that a young child that the women is holding in the picture that is in the 4th row from the left and the 4th row down.

Am I crazy? That looks like a child and I want to call them out but wanting to get another opinion. It is blurry so maybe I'm looking at it wrong?

This is related to pizzagate do to the possible connection to child abuse/child porn.

Per the article: Image by Lia Kantrowitz

IShallNotFear

I always use https://snapito.com to archive vice articles because of this. I can archive the snapito page in archive.is

EDIT: Here is what I did.

First, I took a screenshot of the page at snapito.com . Since vice annoyingly includes other articles on the same screenshot, I had to stop the reloading process on my browser once the image had started to appear.

Second, I copied the image link which includes the original URL ( https://shrinktheweb.snapito.io/v2/webshot/spu-ea68c8-ogi2-3cwn3bmfojjlb56e?size=800x0&screen=1024x768&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vice.com%2Fen_us%2Farticle%2Fzmmbq9%2Fno-one-knows-if-porn-is-bad-for-you) ) and pasted it into archive.is ( http://archive.is/6JxsQ) ).

Cigarette5mokingman

The fact that you have to ask is its a child is telling how ridiculous it is to even bring this up.

mollyzbrownpizza

https://imgur.com/a/99n1v

Here it is circled

mollyzbrownpizza

https://imgur.com/a/99n1v

I screen shot it for reference. It is definitely a photo of a woman holding a baby up in the air and seeming to tongue it. Either way it is suggestive and disgusting.

Narcissism

Asian men can look much younger than they actually are particularly if they/ parents weren't subjected to a Western high sugar/ additive diet. But it does beg the question if pedos like them young why not go out with an Asian adult? The answer off course is its about abuse of the innocent and vulnerable.

Piscina

Vice is a rag. The numbskull who wrote that piece--Gray Chapman--can't write to save himself. But that makes sense, because no self-respecting journalist with an ounce of sense would write for Vice. There are SO many studies that show how porn affects men. Chapman cites nothing as evidence to support his argument. This is the idiocy that gets put out as 'news' these days.

Freemasonsrus

Just to be clear, porn is 100% "bad for you".

3141592653

and also claiming "no one knows if porn is bad for you" is a total lie. there's tons of research.

mrnobu

SOURCES: That's not a Child. That is an image from ANOTHER Vice Article which is a SCREENSHOT FROM PORNHUB - https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7akb7/this-24-year-old-japanese-porn-star-looks-like-a-child The 'Porn Star's' Name is Nishikun, and he's 24 years old. https://video-images.vice.com/_uncategorized/1495010507714-16463596_1321512511225648_2664278387973037186_o.jpeg?resize=1575: *

abcdefg222

I understand your position and was not claiming your friend did anything wrong in my post. I was simply asking if I saw what I thought I saw. Before my outrage set in, I wanted to make sure I knew what I was outraged about.

I appreciate the information you shared and am relieved that it may not be a child in these images, but wow... This looks like CP. There's so much porn out there that screen shots could have been pulled from. Why include this picture? I hope your friend has some kind of answer for you because I can't think of a good reason. They are sharing images that are made to look like child porn, but are actually midgets just pretending to be abused.

It's incredibly disturbing. "Pretend" child abuse images should not be showing up on a news website (or anyone's!!!) facebook feed.

Honeybee_

Sorry hun, this image is put there to imply an agenda that child porn is OK

It doesn't matter who they are, it's visually showing us that Vice thinks this image of "child porn" is OK to watch... how the F are we supposed to know that's a 24 year old?

NOT BUYING IT.

angry_mob

NO Hon, this matter was resolved by SOMEONE WHO KNOWS the graphic designer! you need to get your head out of your ass & LISTEN to other people with more knowledge than you on a subject, not just spout your own blind opinion because you may have gained a little notoriety off of pizzagate. time to stand down.

mollyzbrownpizza

you are crazy and a shill if you think this is okay, whether he is 24 yrs old or not. He LOOKS like a child, only a PEDOPHILE would get off on it and Lia should have had the sense to keep it OUT of a porn collage.

angry_mob

wait a sec, i did not see that pic.

Honeybee_

Nope, nothing to do with being a mod, friend, I am posting as usual, this is my view, tough shit.

angry_mob

fuck right off then

anotherdream

I don't trust VICE. I think they are definitely in someone's pocket as well. They're slant is way too left, and I'm almost sure they have some kind of anti trump agenda going on. They're also way to deep into political sides etc, as they go into war zones and don't really tell the objective reality, - they just paint these emotional montages about the situation that serve to further solidify victim/aggressor scenarios that get absorbed by SJW types and parroted without any kind of reflection on the facts surrounding the situation. Also, they're always hyper normalizing fringe sexuality and fetishism etc. - Doesn't bother me that much if it's between consenting adults, but the minute they start empathizing with pedos - You'll know where they stand. Keep an eye on these fuckers.

pizzagater99

false alarm, it's Kohey Nishi, that image is found on Google Images. case closed.

mollyzbrownpizza

case CLOSED!! It is still "pretend" child porn and it should be illegal as well. It is made with the sole purpose to depict a child-like person. To me it is just as bad as child porn because the people that enjoy and get off on this are only pedophiles.

Honeybee_

HOLY SHIT! THAT'S VILE!!!

DEFINITELY CHILD PORN NSFW

Can't archive because of bots, but I took screenshots of the whole article.

Honeybee_

I reported to NCMEC and ic3.gov... also going through every contract and research investment they have done over the last few years. Vice Media Inc. CONTRIBUTED to Lost Light Projects Inc./Inside Climate News AKA Fake Climate News

"Lost Light Projects, Inc. d/b/a Inside Climate News uses one of those money-laundering donor advised funds called The Network for Good, Inc. to collect money, so there’s virtually no telling where even the $26,014 comes from, let alone the salaries of this staff. Neither “Inside Climate News” nor “Lost Light Projects, Inc.” appears to show up on the Network for Good’s list of grants made in its its latest 990 return, in fact."

Also Vice Magazine Publishing Inc. has an Standard Industrial Code of "Child Daycare Services"

http://imgur.com/a/TRBI1

More info forthcoming.

mollyzbrownpizza

I don't care if it is a 24 year old Japanese person, he is pretending to be a child and the porn is made to depict a child. That should still be illegal and NO ONE should want to see that or stumble upon it even on accident. DISGUSTING!!! We should be outraged!!!

cantsleepawink

I'd be surprised if you get any joy from the NCMEC but I guess you know that already.

I looked into Shane Smith, founder of VICE, back when the Bataclan attack happened in Paris and VICE interviewed the Eagles of Death Metal. Whole other rabbit hole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n74HBrrFnIc

abcdefg222

Thank you!

cantsleepawink

Well that image should be saved for prosperity. Vice is disgusting http://imgur.com/a/qJzqf and http://imgur.com/a/FBz3k

paulf

Revenue: people were archiving all their stuff so they wouldn't get clicks.

paulf

Yes - Vice announced last month it would be blocking archive sites from archiving.

paulf

Unquestionably a child. The ratio of head to body is that of a toddler. The child's arm proportions are much smaller than that of the woman as is its right hand. Repulsive.

Image by Lia Kantrowitz

Every. Fucking. Time.

sugarskull

Absofuckinglutely a kid!!! Shame on you VICE!!!

mrnobu

OK. Gotta jump in here. I come on Voat every single day and am VERY impressed with 99% of the research done here and I've spent the last 10 months of my life convincing EVERYONE I know that the concepts researched and discussed here are REAL and VALID.

BUT, Lia is a childhood friend of mine, and is simply a graphic designer at VICE. NOT A PEDOPHILE.

So, let's take a step back and stop jumping to conclusions. It is important not to just assume things. I'm not saying VICE as a publication is innocent - they're owned by NEWSCORP aka MURDOCH, but let's focus on the EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS and EDITORS rather than the JOURNALISTS and GRAPHIC DESIGNERS.

With that being said - SOURCES:

That's not a Child. That is an image from another Vice Article which is a SCREENSHOT FROM PORNHUB - https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7akb7/this-24-year-old-japanese-porn-star-looks-like-a-child The 'Porn Star's' Name is Nishikun, and he's 24 years old. https://video-images.vice.com/_uncategorized/1495010507714-16463596_1321512511225648_2664278387973037186_o.jpeg?resize=1575: *

This doesn't mean VICE is innocent - I think it is strange and very suspect to push an article that depicts Japan's pedophile fetish and puts a small man on a pedestal for pretending to be a child in porn films - but then again it did get a lot of attention in media because at this point it's been normalized.

paulf

BUT, Lia is a childhood friend of mine, and is simply a graphic designer at VICE. NOT A PEDOPHILE.

Proof or GTFO.

So, let's take a step back and stop jumping to conclusions. It is important not to just assume things. I'm not saying VICE as a publication is innocent - they're owned by NEWSCORP aka MURDOCH, but let's focus on the EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS and EDITORS rather than the JOURNALISTS and GRAPHIC DESIGNERS.

ACTUALLY we'll go after ANYONE complicit in the normalization of the ABUSE OF CHILDREN and don't need ADVICE on HOW TO CONDUCT our research.

The 'Porn Star's' Name is Nishikun, and he's 24 years old.

So while browsing a bunch of porn images for her collage, Lia carefully selected the one that looks like a child and included it.

This doesn't mean VICE is innocent - I think it is strange and very suspect to push an article that depicts Japan's pedophile fetish and puts a small man on a pedestal for pretending to be a child in porn films - but then again it did get a lot of attention in media because at this point it's been normalized.

It's been normalized. I wonder (((who)) could be behind that?

mrnobu

Calm the fuck down. I dont need proof that im friends with the graphic desiner mentioned. The image is from porn hub, it was selected for a DIFFERENT vice article, and she accessed it thru their archives to make a mini graphic. Im not the fucking one to be challenging on something so fuckin minor. I just came here to tell you all that the graphics person who did this article isnt a fuckin pedophile.

mollyzbrownpizza

Since you know Lia please let her know that she screwed up here and throwing a photo of "pretend" child porn in your porn collage is disgusting!!!! This is NOT OKAY and should be illegal.

mrnobu

I did let her know - i called her the second i saw this thread and filled her in on EVERYTHING that is discussed and researched here. Shes terrified now because she, like many other people in the creative field inspired by dark pop culture, is now under fire by researchers. I just came by to break the focus away from someone innocent and remind VOAT that its the BIGGER fish that approve the editorials and push rhetoric such as this.

abcdefg222

I understand your position and was not claiming your friend did anything wrong in my post. I was simply asking if I saw what I thought I saw. Before my outrage set in, I wanted to make sure I knew what I was outraged about.

I appreciate the information you shared and am relieved that it may not be a child in these images, but wow... This looks like CP. There's so much porn out there that screen shots could have been pulled from. Why include this picture? I hope your friend has some kind of answer for you because I can't think of a good reason. They are sharing images that are made to look like child porn, but are actually midgets just pretending to be abused.

It's incredibly disturbing. "Pretend" child abuse images should not be showing up on a news website (or anyone's!!!) facebook feed.

mrnobu

All good bruh

commonsenseisded

wow that's disgusting

Ziggystrife

Shocked!

GhostOfSwartz

Yeah this is the site that had to change it's headline this morning about blowing up mt Rushmore. And that bottom image of the Asian lady is of her and a midget that dressed up as a kid. There was a story on here awhile back about it.

fuck_pedo_enablers

Here is the original image . It's this guy. But they could've used any amount of images. It's disturbing that they went with this.

GhostOfSwartz

Yep that's the one

conspiracyprincess

Strange they changed the color of his outfit to pink on the vice page.

fuck_pedo_enablers

It looks like they've made all the images pink.