I think you're onto something there

Has one been put up for the Charlottesville Challenger yet?

How are the kids?

How the kiddy subs goin gabara? I notice you are taunting members. Whatta mod. How are the kids?

The lack of even bare minimum info on her death is odd. Most sources said "found dead", but where? Was she at home with her wife? Some sources said "died from complications of stroke" did she make it to the hospital? If she made it to the hospital then they didn't "find her dead", and if they found her dead, how do they know it was a stroke, and not something like a heart attack? Was there an autopsy? Was there a tox screen to eliminate common poisons that mimic stroke (arsenic, methyl iodide)? Will there be a funeral?

There are several ways of inducing the kind of blood-related issues which can lead to a stroke, but perhaps the most effective - if you want to term it that - is the use of hydrogen peroxide solution. There’s an article on the mechanism by which H2O2 would cause this to be found here - Hydrogen peroxide-induced stroke: elucidation of the mechanism in vivo - and I suspect that because the chemical degrades to just water and oxygen very rapidly, no trace of it would be found in the body at a post-mortem. Quite how you’d introduce it into someone’s blood stream without them knowing and without evidence of a puncture mark, I don’t know.

This is incredible. It's basically an admission of guilt and involvement. They doth protest too much.

There's no evidence this woman was murdered. It's disinfo to post that she was. Here's the quote from Snopes. There's nothing innaccurate about it.

the unreliable web site Your News Wire falsely reported that Liz MacKean, a controversial former BBC journalist, had been found dead “in suspicious circumstances”:

Your News Wire is unreliable. They don't to any reporting. They just take a real news article and spin it. And guess what, YNW doesn't mention murder at all. You added your own spin to that.

YNW said she died under suspicious circumstances and Snopes points out none of the original articles say that. It's a pretty easy article to write. All you have to do is check with the original sources and you find none of them mention any suspicious circumstances.

Bopper, now I've commented.

A few old school voaters are messing with this sub and have mod positions. I made a bait post bringing them all out which worked obviously. These are people who support pedophiles such as /u/Hecho and are pretending to be anti-pedo just to gain a voice and influence here. You can see users such as /u/Gabara and /u/ExpertShitposter

here is that recent post. These are the main people who controls what people see nearly site-wide. Their connections go to a group of about 30-35 power-users who can all be find by looking at the subs they moderate.

This sub started out great before the hostile take over of /v/ProtectVoat mods, who are not honest nor care if pedophiles get caught, and they have associations with known shill subs such as /v/SoapBoxBanHammer , /v/SoapDoxBanHammer , /v/RidersOfTheReich and are on a quest to demoralize pizzagaters.

What happened was these trolls made a bunch of new accounts and spammed and caused a problem only they could fix, so the sub was handed over to them.

Pedo sympathizers run this sub. They are desperate to look genuine and use upvote brigades to reinforce their fake popular opinion. you can see them in this thread all doing their thing. I even called them out there and they missed it.

Stay vigilant, there needs to be a real global effort of this sub to migrate to a new subverse ran by investigators who have been treated poorly and simply want open forum for discussion without cancer moderation.

Think of the stem cells

I will bet my last dollar that those vile, shit-eating excuses for humans, much less journalists, monitor this sub.

So here is a message for you propagandists. We know who you are. We know what you are. And when we win this war - whether it takes 2 years, 8 years, or 20 years or more - I assure you that we will hunt you down until you are driven to the same fate as your mentor, Joseph Goebbels.

[If you don't know how Goebbel's met his end, it's worth a few seconds. It would be the most appropriate way to see the propagandists at #snopes end their careers.

thanks! this is hilarious

I don't get it :)

yup. totally unbiased. fully researched. objective as it gets. according to Snopes.

tendies?

yeah, they're on top of this before barely anyone's even talking about her having been murdered. isn't that what the Streisand Effect is? Snopes, always covering for organized child abusers.

Why hasnt someone created a right wing snopes, or something? If i wasn't old and tech retarded i would.

Id call it nothingbutthetruth.com

What is there angle on doing something like this?

They must need more money for hookers and blow

The fact they reference jimmy saville in snopes makes me have a theory in this...

Journalist discovers that saville was just a fall guy and that a much bigger operation was at hand. She is silenced via stroke and the story of her hard work to expose a pedo ring will go down in history. While what she could have potentially exposed will never be investigated.

Anytime Snopes puts out a story refuting anything too strongly, it's a red flag to start investigating their bs spin on the topic.

Are We Sure that was fast my friend. How do you juggle two gigs? And are you contract or salary or what. I'm sure you clock your hours here but surely Snopes is contract freelance.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's suicide orbituary has been ready to go for months.